Disappearing Chinese Collectivism: Changes in Mentality and Behavior of Young Chinese
Abstract
The traditional perception of China as a collectivist country is slowly ceasing to be true. After the economic changes, the social changes are coming, as a result of which collectivism slowly gives way to individualism. Changes take place in many spheres of life: private—replacing a large, multi-generational family with a nuclear family with one child, a growing number of divorces, protection of the individual’s privacy; professional—the emergence of foreign companies with a different culture of work, competition and “rat race”; moral—verbal persistence to collectivist values that do not match the private patterns of behavior. China’s economic development and the actual promotion of capitalist values, with the persistent verbal attachment to socialist values, have caused an increasing number of Chinese people, especially those from the so-called post-80 generation and younger, to not identify any longer with the values of older generations and put their own interest over the interest of the family, kinship group or nation. The gap between official rhetoric and the declared attachment to collectivism is slowly growing, and the capitalist realities are forcing people to individualistic behavior and competition for access to goods and resources.
References
A nation of individuals. „The Economist” 2016.07.09. Dostęp 15.01.2017. http://www.economist.com/news/special-report/21701650-chinese-people-increasingly-do-what-they-want-not-what-hey-are- told-nation.
Brindley, Erica Fox. Individualism in Early China: Human Agency and the Self in Thought and Politics. Manoa: University of Hawai‘i Press, 2010.
Cheung, Kwok Wah, i Suyan Pan, „Transition Of Moral Education In China: Towards Regulated Individualism”, Citizenship Teaching and Learning 2 (2006), no. 2: 37–50.
Earley, P. Christopher. „Social Loafing and, Collectivism: A Comparison of the United States and the People’s Republic of China”. Administrative Science Quarterly 34 (1989), no. 4: 565–581. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2393567.
Earley, P. Christopher. „Self or Group? Cultural Effects of Training on Self-efficacy and Performance”. Administrative Science Quarterly 39 (1994), no 1: 89–117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2393495.
Hofstede, Geert. Culture’s consequence: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1980.
Hofstede, Geert, i Michael Harris Bond. „The Confucius Connection: From Cultural Roots to Economic Growth”. Organizational Dynamics 16 (1988), no. 4: 4-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(88)90009-5.
Hofstede, Geert, Geert Jan Hofstede i Michael Minkov, Kultury i organizacje. Tłum. Małgorzata Durska. Warszawa: Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne, 2007.
Lardy, Nicholas R. Markets Over Mao. The Rise of Private Business in China. Washington: Peterson Institute for International Economics, 2014.
Leung, Kwok, i Michael Harris Bond. „The Impact of Cultural Collectivism on Reward Allocation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 47 (1984), no. 47: 793–804. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.47.4.793.
Lockett, Martin. „Culture and the Problem of Chinese Management”. Organization Studies 9 (1988), no. 3: 475-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/017084068800900402.
Nevis, Edwin C. „Using an American Perspective in Understanding Another Culture: Toward a Hierarchy of Needs for the People’s Republic of China”. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 1983, 19/3: 249–264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002188638301900304.
Niewdana, Leszek, „Osobowe relacje (guanxi) w chińskim biznesie”. W: Ewa Zajdler (red.). Zrozumieć Chińczyków. Kulturowe kody społeczności chińskich, 205–236. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Akademickie Dialog, 2011.
Redding, S.G. „Cognition As An Aspect of Culture and Its Relation to Management Process: An Exploratory View of the Chinese Case”. Journal of Management Studies 17 (1980), no. 2: 127–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1980.tb00080.x.
Wang Hui. „Contemporary Chinese Thought and the Question of Modernity”. W: Zhang Xudong (ed.). Whither China?: Intellectual Politics in Contemporary China, 161–198. Duke University Press Books, Durham 2002.
Wang Ying 王颖, 新集体主义: 乡忖社会的再组织, 北京: 经济管理出版社 [Wang Ying, Xin jiti zhuyi: Xiang cun shehui de zai zuzhi, Beijing: Jingji guanli chuban she], 1996
Whyte, Martin K.,Feng Wang, Cai Yong. „Challenging Myths About China’s One-Child Policy”. „The China Journal” 74 (2015): 44–159.
Yan, Yunxiang. “Introduction: Conflicting Images of the Individual and Contested Process of Individualization”. W: Mette Halskov Hansen i Rune Svarverud (red.), iChina: The Rise of the Individual in Modern Chinese Society. NIAS Studies in Asian Topics, No. 45, 1–38. Copenhagen: NIAS Press, 2010.
Yan, Yunxiang. „The Chinese path to individualization”. The British Journal of Sociology 61 (2010), no. 3: 489-512. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2010.01323.x.
Zhu, Yuan. „New concept of individualism applies”. China Daily, 18.06.2014. Dostęp 15.01. 2017. http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/opinion/2014-06/18/content_17595810.htm.
Copyright (c) 2018 Roczniki Humanistyczne
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.