Λέγε δή: What We Know about the Ancient Greek Particle δή – the Current State of Research

Kamila Tomaka

doi:10.18290/rh22703.2

Kamila Tomaka John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4514-0600

Keywords: Ancient Greek particles, particle δή, the state of research, the discourse-pragmatic approach

Abstract

Although research has already established the function of the commonest Greek particles, there is a significant gap in the research on the function of δή in comparison with that carried out on other particles. Assigning a functional significance to this particle is problematic, especially since a satisfactory definition of the function of δή remains, I believe, a desideratum. The usage of the particle δή may appear at first sight to have little significance in Greek texts. This article aims to show that nothing could be further from the truth. The particle δή has had a considerable impact on the discourse. In line with this insight, in this contribution I present the way in which scholars have carried out their investigations into the particle δή. Specific attention is paid to (a) the question of how modern scholars classify this particle, (b) what kind of definition and characteristics they assign to this particle, and (c) what purpose this particle is intended to serve in the discourse according to current research. This paper also provides moot points in the research on the particle δή and ideas for further consideration. The main purpose of this paper is to bring together a summary of the current published information about the particle δή for ready reference for those actively engaged in studying Greek particles.

References

Abbott, Thomas K. “On δή after Relatives in Plato.” Hermathena, vol. 7, 1890, pp. 44-45.

Allan, Rutger J. “Pointing to Common Ground in Dramatic Dialogue: The Case of δή and τοι.” Pragmatic Approaches to Drama : Studies in Communication on the Ancient Stage, edited by Gunther Martin, Federica Iurescia, Severin Hof, and Giada Sorrentino, The Language of Classical Literature, vol. 32, Brill, 2020, pp. 43-69.

Bäumlein, Wilhelm von. Untersuchungen über griechische Partikeln. Stuttgart, 1861.

Beekes, Robert. Etymological Dictionary of Greek, vol. 2, Brill, 2011.

Birkler, W. Die oratorischen Transitions- und Argumentations-Phrasen τί δέ; τί δέ δή; τί οὖν; τί δαί; τί δῆτα. Ehingen & Tübingen, 1867.

Bonifazi, Anna, Annemieke Drummen, and Mark De Kreij Mark, editors. Particles in ancient Greek discourse: Five volumes exploring particle use across genres. Hellenic Studies Series, Washington D.C., 2016.

Chantraine, Pierre. Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue grecque. Histoire des mots. T. 1 (Α-Δ). Klincksieck, 1968.

Denniston, John D. The Greek Particles. 2nd ed. rev. by Kenneth J. Dover, Duckworth, 1954.

Denniston, John D. The Greek Particles. Clarendon Press, 1934.

Denniston, John D. “δή.” The Greek Particles. Oxford, 1934, pp. 203-262.

Duhoux, Yves. “Grec écrit et grec parlé: une étude contrastive des particules aux Ve-IVesiècles.” New Approaches to Greek Particles, edited by Alber Rijksbaron, Brill, 1997, pp. 15-48.

van Emde Boas, Evert. Tragic Evidentiality? A Study of δή in Tragedy. Dissertation Master of Studies in Greek and/or Latin Language and Literature. Number 47940, Magdalen College, Oxford, 2005.

van Emde Boas, Evert, Albert Rijksbaron, Luuk Huitink, Mathieu de Bakker, editors. The Cambridge Grammar of Classical Greek. Cambridge University Press, 2018.

van Erp Taalman Kip, Anna M. “Καὶ μήν, καὶ δή and ἤδη in Tragedy and Comedy.” Discourse Cohesion in Ancient Greek, edited by Stéphanie J. Bakker and Gerry C. Wakker, Amsterdam Studies in Classical Philology, vol. 16, Brill, 2009, pp. 111-133.

Frisk, Hjalmar. Griechisches Etymologisches Wörterbuch von … Carl Winter Universitätsverlag, 1970.

George, Coulter H. “Greek Particles: Just a Literary Phenomenon?” Discourse Cohesion in Ancient Greek, edited by Stéphanie J. Bakker and Gerry C. Wakker, Amsterdam Studies in Classical Philology, vol. 16, Brill, 2009, pp. 155-169.

Hartung, Johann A. Commentatio de particulis δή et ἤδη. Erlangen: Junge, 1828.

Heller, H. “Epistola ad Max. Dunkerum de particulis ἤδη et δή.” Philologus, vol. 8, 1853, pp. 254-308.

Kühner, Raphael, and Bernhard Gerth. Ausführliche Grammatik der griechischen Sprache. 2. Tl.: Satzlehre, 2. Bd, Hannover, 1890.

Leumann, Manu. “Μέν und μήν, δέ und δή.” Museum Helveticum, vol. 6, 1949, pp. 85-89.

Liddell, Henry G., and Robert Scott. A Greek-English Lexicon, edited by Henry Stuart Jones and Roderick McKenzie, Clarendon Press, 1996.

van Ophuijsen, Johannes M., Sicking Christiaan M. J. Two Studies in Attic Particle Usage: Lysias and Plato. Brill, 1993.

van Ophuijsen, Johannes M. “Οὖν, ἄρα, δή, τοινῦν: The Linguistic Articulation of Arguments in Plato’s Phaedo.” Two Studies in Attic Particle Usage: Lysias and Plato, edited by Johannes M. van Ophuijsen and Christiaan M. J. Sicking, Brill, 1993, pp. 67-164.

van der Pas, Stephanie. “The normal road to geometry: Δή in Euclid’s Elements and the mathematical competence of his audience.” The Classical Quarterly (New Series), vol. 64, no. 2, 2014, pp. 558-573.

Redondo Moyano, Elena. “Δή.” Estudio sintáctico de las partículas en el periodo helenístico: Herodas, Adolf M. Hakkert, 1995, pp. 79-90.

Rijksbaron, Albert. New Approaches to Greek Particles. Proceedings of the Colloquium held in Amsterdam, 4-6 January 1996, to honour Cornelis J. Ruijgh on the occasion of his retirement, J. C. Gieben, 1997.

van Rooy, Raf. “The Relevance of Evidentiality for Ancient Greek: Some Explorative Steps through Plato.” Journal of Greek Linguistics, vol. 16, issuse 1, 2016, pp. 3-46.

Ruijgh, Cornelis J. Autour de “TE Epique”: Études sur la syntaxe grecque, Adolf M. Hakkert, 1971.

Sicking, Christiaan M. J. “Griekse partikels: Definitie en classificatie.” Lampas, vol. 19, 1986, pp. 125-141.

Sicking, Christiaan M. J. “Devices for Text Articulation in Lysias I and XII.” Two Studies in Attic Particle Usage: Lysias and Plato, edited by Johannes M. van Ophuijsen and Christiaan M. J. Sicking, Brill, 1993, pp. 1-66.

Sicking, Christiaan M. J. “Partikels in Vragen bij Plato.” Lampas, vol. 29, no. 5, 1996, pp. 446-463.

Sicking, Christiaan M. J. “Particles in Questions in Plato.” New Approaches to Greek Particles, edited by Albert Rijksbaron, Brill, 1997, pp. 157-174.

Slings, Simon R. “Δέ or δή in a « Defixio » from Olbia ?” Mnemosynei, vol. 51, 1998, pp. 84-85.

Smyth, Herbert W. Greek Grammar, revised by Gordon M. Messing, Harvard University Press, 1956.

Stürmer, Franz. “Über die Partikel δή bei Homer.” Berliner Philologische Wochenschrifti, vol. 32, 1912, pp. 1844-1845.

Thiemann, Carl. “Über den Gebrauch der Partikel δή und ihre Bedeutung bei Homer.” Zeitschrift für das Gymnasialwesen, vol. 35, 1881, pp. 530-534.

Thijs, Kees. Polysemous particles in Ancient Greek. A study with special reference to μήν and δή, PhD dissertation, Radboud University Nijmegen, 2021.

Thomas, Frederick W. “ἤδη and δή in Homer.” Journal of Philology, vol. 23, 1894, pp. 81-115.

Wakker, Gerry C. “Conditionals in the layered structure of Functional Grammar.” Layered structure and reference in a functional perspective, edited by Michael Fortescue, Peter Harder and L. Kristoffersen, John Benjamins, 1992, pp. 369-386.

Wakker, Gerry C. Conditions and Conditionals: An Investigation of Ancient Greek, J. C. Gieben, 1994.

Wakker, Gerry C. “Emphasis and Affirmation: Some Aspects of μήν in Tragedy.” New Approaches to Greek Particles, edited by Albert Rijksbaron, Brill, 1997, pp. 209-231.

Wakker, Gerry C. “Modal Particles and Different Points of View in Herodotus and Thucydides.” Grammar as Interpretation. Greek Literature in Its Linguistic Contexts, edited by Egbert J. Bakker, Brill, 1997, pp. 215-250.