Military Rhetoric in the Description of Women’s Behavior on the Basis of Cicero’s and Livy’s Selected Texts
Abstrakt
The Polish version of the article was published in Roczniki Humanistyczne vol. 60, issue 3 (2012).
The article analyzes the original and rare Roman military phraseology found in surviving works of literature, which is part of the convention of invectives against women. As testified by the surviving fragments of the Law of the Twelve Tables, the Roman civilization divided the sphere of men’s activities (politics and war) from the sphere of women’s activities (home and family) quite early. Literature imbued with didacticism supported this division by creating archetypal figures of ideal representatives of both genders. In the course of development it worked out a stereotyped phraseology that served the purpose of describing virtutes feminae and, separately, men’s virtues, corresponding to the spheres ascribed to them. Any breach of the order established by tradition (mores maiorum) and law encountered severe reprimands, which nevertheless remained within the rhetorical convention of vituperatio. The two texts by outstanding rhetors that are analyzed here—Cato the Elder’s speech against the repeal of the Oppian law (AUC 34, 2-4) by Livy and Marcus Tullius Cicero’s speech Pro Caelio—supply examples of the use of military phraseology, usually used to describe typically male activities, in descriptions of women’s behavior. In the case of Marcus Porcius Cato’s speech, vocabulary belonging to the field of military science (agmen, expugnare, obsidere, coniuratio, seditio) serves the purpose of inducing fear in the men listening to him. In this way, by using the threat of power being seized in the republic by women, the consul motivated patres familias to act and not to yield to women. In the case of Cicero’s speech, military rhetoric was used to ridicule and embarrass Clodia Metelli as a credible witness for the prosecution in the trial of Marcus Caelius Rufus. Aggressive and at times obscene humor was supposed to divert the listeners’ attention from the defense’s lack of arguments concerning the substance of the trial.
The original military phraseology used by both authors serves definite practical aims. What is more, its artistic dimension is decidedly pushed into the background. Cicero’s and Livy’s surprising idea allows us, on the one hand, to appreciate their ingeniousness in the field of rhetoric and their conscious rejection of conventions; on the other, it helps the contemporary reader of ancient texts realize the fact that men of the period of the Republic found it difficult to keep women within the limits imposed by tradition. They were forced to resort to sophisticated verbal argumentation in order to convince the judges and politicians (in both these groups patres familias prevailed) about the real threat posed by the ones in their charge.
Bibliografia
Austin, Roland Gregory. M. Tulii Ciceronis pro M. Caelio oratio, 3rd edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1960.
Bauman, Richard A. Women and Politics in Ancient Rome. London and New York: Routledge, 2003.
Briscoe, John. A Commentary on Livy Books XXIV–XXXVII. Oxford: Clarendon, 1981.
Corbeill, Anthony. “Ciceronian Invective.” In Brill’s Companion to Cicero. Oratory and Rhetoric, edited by James M. May, 197–217. Leiden: Brill, 2002.
Corbeill, Anthony. “Dining Deviants in Roman Political Invective.” In Roman Sexualities, edited by Judith P. Hallet and Marylin B. Skinner, 98–128. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997.
Culham, Phyllis. “Women in Religion in the Roman Republic.” In The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Republic, edited by Harriet I. Flower, 139-59. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
Dorey, Thomas Alan. “Cicero, Clodia, and the Pro Caelio.” Greece and Rome. Second Series 5, no. 2 (1958): 175–180.
Dziuba, Agnieszka. “‘Nec Hercules contra plures.’ Literacki aspekt Liwiańskiej debaty nad zniesieniem Lex Oppia (AUC 34, 1–8)” [“’Nec Hercules contra plures.’ The literary aspect of the Livian debate on repealing Lex Oppia (AUC 34, 1–8)”]. Roczniki Humanistyczne 58–59 (2010–2011): 73–87.
Geffcken, Katherine A. Comedy in the Pro Caelio (Mnemosyne Supplementum XXX). Leiden: Brill, 1973.
Gotoff, Harold C. “Cicero’s Analysis of the Prosecution Speeches in the Pro Caelio: An Exercise in Practical Criticism.” Classical Philology 81, no. 2 (1986): 122–132.
Graves, Robert. Mity greckie [The Greek myths]. Translated by Henryk Krzeczkowski. Warsaw: Państwowy Instytut Wydawniczy, 1967.
Holkeskamp, Karl-Joachim. “Under Roman Roofs: Family, House, and Household.” In The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Republic, edited by Harriet I. Flower, 113–137. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
Jońca, Maciej. Głośne rzymskie procesy karne [Famous Roman criminal trials]. Wrocław: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich, 2009.
Korpanty, Józef. Rzeczpospolita potomków Romulusa [The Republic of Romulus’ descendants]. Warsaw: Czytelnik, 1979.
Lausberg, Heinrich. Retoryka literacka. Podstawy wiedzy o literaturze [Handbook of literary rhetoric: A foundation for literary study]. Translated, edited, and introduced by Albert Gorzkowski. Bydgoszcz: Homini, 2002.
Leen, Anne. “Clodia Oppugnatrix. The Domus Motif in Cicero’s Pro Caelio.” The Classical Journal 96, no. 2 (2000/2001): 141–162.
Salzman, Michele Renee. “Cicero, the Megalenses and the Defense of Caelius.” The American Journal of Philology 103, no. 3 (1982): 299–304.
Scullard, Howard Hayes. Scipio Africanus. Soldier and Politician. Cornell: Cornell University Press, 1970.
Skinner, Marilyn B. Clodia Metelli. The Tribune’s Sister. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
Skwara, Ewa. Historia komedii rzymskiej [The history of Roman comedy]. Warsaw: Prószyński i S-ka, 2001.
Copyright (c) 2019 Roczniki Humanistyczne
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
