Circumfixed Causatives in Russian and Polish: A Root-based Account
Abstrakt
Kauzatywa cyrkumfiksalne w rosyjskim i polskim – podejście oparte na rdzeniu
W artykule próbujemy wyjaśnić tajemniczy brak zgodności między prefiksacją kauzatywów i antykauzatywów w językach słowiańskich na przykładzie rosyjskiego i polskiego. Posługujemy się modelem morfo-syntaksy opartym na rdzeniu wyrazowym, w którym poszczególne typy czasowników nie są derywowane z siebie wzajemnie, a raczej poczynając od rdzenia. Taki model pozwala nam wyjaśnić wzajemnie wykluczającą się dystrybucję prefiksów w przypadku badanych czasowników. Czasowniki kauzatywne mają w swojej strukturze prefiks strony czynnej, podczas gdy antykauzatywa – strony nieczynnej. Ta różnica w budowie zapewnia brak odpowiedniości omawianych czasowników.
W bardziej tradycyjnym podejściu do derywacji czasownikowej, gdzie jeden czasownik jest wywodzony od drugiego, taki brak odpowiednich form jest trudny do wyjaśnienia, ponieważ czasowniki kauzatywne i antykauzatywne zbliżają się do siebie zarówno znaczeniowo, jak i formalnie.
Bibliografia
Alexiadou, Artemis. 2010. “On the morpho-syntax of (anti)causative verbs.” In Lexical semantics, syntax, and event structure, edited by Malka Rappaport Hovav, Edit Doron, and Ivy Sichel, 177–203. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Alexiadou, Artemis, and Elena Anagnostopoulou. 2004. “Voice morphology in the Causative-inchoative alternation; evidence for a non-unifiedstructural analysis of unaccusatives.” In The unaccusativity puzzle, edited by Artemis Alexiadou, Elena Anagnostopoulou and Martin Everaert, 114-136. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Alexiadou, Artemis, and Edit Doron. 2012. “The syntactic construction of two non-active voices: passive and middle.” Journal of Linguistics 48 (01): 1–34.
Arad, Maya. 2005. Roots and patterns: Hebrew morpho-syntax. Dordrecht: Springer.
Chafe, Wallace. 1970. Meaning and the structure of languages. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Doron, Edit, and Marie Labelle. 2011. “An ergative analysis of French valency alternations.” In Romance Linguistics 2010: Selected papers from the 40th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), Seattle, Washington, March 2010, edited by Julia Herschensohn. 137–154.
Dowty, David. 1972. “On the syntax and semantics of the atomic predicate CAUSE”. In Papers from the 8th Regional Meeting. Chicago Linguistic Society, 62-74. April 14–16, 1972, edited by Paul M. Peranteau, Judith N. Levi, Gloria C. Phares.
Dowty, David. 1979. Word meaning and Montague Grammar—The Semantics of Verbs and Times in Generative Semantics and in Montague’s PTQ. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Embick, David. 2004. “On the Structure of Resultative Participles in English.” Linguistic Inquiry 35 (3). 355-392.
Embick, David. 2009. “Roots, States, and Stative Passives.” Abstract for Root Workshop, University of Stuttgart.
Filip, Hana. 2013. “Slavic aspect: A constantly moving goal.” A paper presented at FDSL Conference, Leipzig 2013.
Fillmore, Charles J. 1970. “The Grammar of Hitting and Breaking.” In Readings in English Transformational Grammar, edited by Roderick A. Jacobs and Peter S. Rosenbaum, 120-133. Waltham, Mass.: Ginn.
Gorbachov, Yaroslav. 2007. Indo-European origins of the Nasal Inchoative Class in Germanic and Balto-Slavic. Ph. D. Dissertation. Harvard University 2007.
Haspelmath, Martin. 1993. “More on the typology of inchoative/causative verb alternations.” In Causatives and Transitivity. Studies in Language Companion, edited by Bernard Comrie and Maria Polinsky. Series 23: 87-111.
Jackendoff, Ray S. 1972. Semantic interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Jakobson, Roderick. 1948. “Russian Conjugation.” Word 4: 155–165.
Kuznecova, Ariadna I., and Tat’jana F. Efremova. 1986. Slovar morfem russkogo jazyka. Moskva: Russkij jazyk.
Lakoff, George. 1965/70. On the nature of syntactic irregularity. Ph.D., Indiana University. Published by Holt, Rinhard and Winston as Irregularity in syntax.
Lakoff, George. 1968. “Some verbs of change and causation.” In Mathematical Linguistics and Automatic Translation, Report NSF-20, edited by Susumo Kuno, 1-27. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Langendoen, Terence. 1969. The study of syntax. The Generative Transformational approach to the structure of American English. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Lomashvili, Leila. 2011. Complex predicates. The syntax-morphology interface. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Łazorczyk, Agnieszka. 2010. Decomposing Slavic Aspect: The Role of Aspectual Morphology in Polish and Other Slavic Languages. Ms., University of Southern California.
MacDonald, Jonathan E. 2008. The Syntactic Nature of Inner Aspect. A Minimalist Perspective. Linguistics Today 133. Amsterdam: John Beniamin’s.
Malicka-Kleparska, Anna. 2013. “In search of causative structures in the root based morphology: a case of Polish roz-/roze- causatives.” Studies in Polish Linguistics, vol 8(2): 58–75.
Malicka-Kleparska, Anna. 2014a. “Structure and semantics behind the non-deletable arguments of morphologically complex transitive verbs in Polish.” In Complex visibles out there. Proceedings of the Olomouc Linguistic Colloquium 2014, edited by Ludmila Veselovská and Markéta Janebová, 401–416. Olomouc: Palackỳ University.
Malicka-Kleparska, Anna. 2014b. “Polish anticausative morpho-syntax; a case for a root-based model against lexicalist reflexivization.” In Slavic Linguistic Society: New insights into Slavic linguistics, edited by Jacek Witkoś and Sylwester Jaworski, 253–269. New York: Peter Lang.
Marantz, Alec Paul. 1984. On the Nature of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
McCawley, James. 1976. “Remarks on what can cause what.” In The grammar of causative constructions, Syntax and Semantics 6, edited by Masayoshi Shibatani, 117–129. New York: Academic Press.
Nichols, Johanna. 1993. “Transitive and causative in the Slavic lexicon: Evidence from Russian.” In Causatives and Transitivity. Studies in Language Companion. Series 23, edited by Bernard Comrie and Maria Polinsky, 69–86. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Olszewska, Teresa. 1986. Causativity as a Linguistic Phenomenon. A Study Based on English and Polish. Lublin: UMCS, 1986.
Pustejovsky, James. 1995. The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
Pylkkänen, Liina. 2008. Introducing Arguments. Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 48. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
Rościńska-Frankowska, Magda. 2012. On the derivation of causative and inchoative verb forms in Polish. Generative Linguistics in Wrocław 1. Wrocław: Center for General and Comparative Linguistics.
Schenker, Alexander M. 1954. “Polish Conjugation.” Word 10: 469–481.
Svenonius, Peter (2004). “Slavic prefixes inside and outside VP.” In Nordlyd 32.2. Special issue on Slavic prefixes, edited by Peter Svenonius, 205–253. Tromsø: CASTL.
Szcześniak, Konrad. 2008. “Unaccusative marks.” In Morphosyntactic issues in second language acquisition. Second Language Acquisition 29, edited by Danuta Gabryś-Barker, 121–131. Multilingual Matters: Bristol.
Tikhonov, Aleksandr Nikolaevich. 1985. Slvoobrazovatelnyj slovar russkogo jazyka. Moskva: Russkij jazyk.
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1975. „Why ‘kill’ does not mean ‘cause to die’. The semantics of action sentences.” Foundations of language 13, 491–528.
Wróbel, Henryk. 1984. “Słowotwórstwo czasowników.” [Word formation of verbs]. In Morfologia [Morphology], edited by Renata Grzegorczykowa, Roman Laskowski and Henryk Wróbel, 467–511. Warszawa: PWN.
Van Valin, Robert D. 2013. “Lexical Representation, Co-composition, and Linking Syntax and Semantics.” In Advances in Generative Lexicon Theory, edited by James Pustejovsky et al., 67–107. Dordrecht: Springer.
Zaliznyak, Andrey A. 1977. Gramaticeskij slovar’ russkogo jazyka; Slovoizmenenie. Moscow: Russkij Jazyk.
Copyright (c) 2015 Roczniki Humanistyczne
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
