The Image of Man in Metafictional Novels by John Banville: Celebrating the Power of the Imagination

  • Maciej Czerniakowski Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II, Wydział Nauk Humanistycznych
Słowa kluczowe: postmodernism; metafiction; creative imagination; intertextuality; heterotopia

Abstrakt

Artykuł analizuje strategie budowy obrazu człowieka, które John Banville stosuje w swoich dwóch metafikcyjnych powieściach – Kepler i Doctor Copernicus. Autor eseju kolejno omawia: siłę kreatywnej wyobraźni domniemanego autora i narratora oraz samoświadomość jednej z postaci, Rheticusa, w tworzeniu fikcji oraz intertekstualność powieści. Przy okazji analizy ostatniego aspektu utworów wspomniany zostaje również termin Michela Foucault – heterotopia. Wnioski o człowieku, do jakich prowadzi ta analiza, pokazują, że z jednej strony dysponuje on praktycznie nieograniczoną wyobraźnią twórczą. Z drugiej zaś, człowiek jest zagubiony w świecie niewyraźnych granic ontologicznych, co udowadnia dość paradoksalną wizję człowieka.

Bibliografia

Ajdukiewicz, Kazimierz. Zagadnienia i kierunki filozofii. Warszawa: Czytelnik, 1983.

Barnes, Julian. Flaubert’s Parrot. New York: Vintage Books, 1990.

Barnes, Julian. The History of the World in 10 ½ Chapters. London: Picador, 2005.

Banville, John. Kepler. London: Picador, 1999.

Banville, John. Doctor Copernicus. London: Picador, 1999.

Banville, John. The Newton Letter: An Interlude. London: Secker & Warburg, 1983.

Banville, John. Mefisto. London: Picador, 1999.

Banville, John. The Book of Evidence. London: Picador, 1998.

Booker, M. Keith. “Cultural Crisis Then and Now: Science, Literature, and Religion in John Banville’s ‘Doctor Copernicus’ and ‘Kepler’.” Proquest Dissertations and Theses. Wisconsin: Marquette University, 2000. Proquest. 17 March 2012. <http://search.proquest.com/docview/304625906?accountid=136941>.

Butkatė, Jūratė. “Postmodern Transgressions of Narrative: An Intertextual Dialogue between J. Banville’s The Book of Evidence (1989) and V. Nabokov’s Lolita (1955).” Literatūra. 49.5 (2007): 17-25.

Copernicus, Nicolas. De Revolutionibus. Trans. Edward Rosen. Baltimore. The John Hopkins UP. 30 Dec. 2011. <http://www.webexhibits.org/calendars/year-textCopernicus.html>.

Egginton, William. “Reality is Bleeding: A Brief History of Film from the Sixteenth Century.” Configurations. Baltimore: The John Hopkins UP, 2001. 207-229.

Foucault, Michel. “Of Other Spaces.” Diacritics 16.1 (1986): 22-27. JSTOR. 03 May 2012. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/464648>.

Gingerich, Owen. “From Copernicus to Kepler: Heliocentrism as Model and as Reality.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 117.6 (1973): 513-522. JSTOR. 14 Dec. 2011. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/986462>.

Gingerich, Owen and James MacLachlan. Nicolaus Copernicus: Making the Earth a Planet. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2005.

Hand, Derek. A History of the Irish Novel. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2011.

Hartner, Willy. “Copernicus, the Man, the Work, and Its History.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 117.6 (1973): 413-422. JSTOR. 14 Dec. 2011. <http://www.jstor.org/ stable/986460>.

Hateley, Erica. “Flaubert’s Parrot as Modernist Quest.” Q/W/E/R/T/Y: Arts, Litteratures & Civilisations du Monde Anglophone 11 (2001): 177-181.

Hawthorn, Jeremy. Studying the Novel. London: Hodder Education, 2005.

Hutheon, Linda. A Poetics of Postmodernism: History, Theory, Fiction. London: Routledge, 2002.

Jameson, Frederic. “The Politics of Theory: Ideological Positions in the Postmodernist Debate.” Modern Criticism and Theory. Harlow: Longman, 1999. 348-359.

“John Kepler.” The Illustrated Magazine of Art 3.16 (1854): 233-234, JSTOR. 14 Dec. 2011. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/20538267>.

Kamiński, Stanisław. Nauka i metoda: Pojęcie nauki i klasyfikacja nauk. Lublin: Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL, 1992.

Lee, Alison. Realism and Power. London, Routledge: 1990.

Losse, John. Wprowadzenie do filozofii nauki. Warszawa: Prószyński i S-ka. 2001.

Matz, Jesse. “The Novel.” A Companion to Modernist Literature and Culture. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2006. 215-226.

Mchale, Brian. Postmodernist Fiction. London: Routledge, 2004.

McIlroly, Brian. “Pattern in Chaos: John Banville’s Scientific Art.” Colby Quarterly 31.1 (1995): 74-80.

McMinn, Joseph. “Naming the World: Language and Experience in John Banville’ Fiction.” Irish University Review 23.2 (1993): 183-196. JSTOR. 14 Dec. 2011. <http://www.jstor.org/ stable/25484560>.

McMinn, Joseph. “An Exalted Naming: The Poetical Fictions of John Banville.” Canadian Journal of Irish Studies 14.1 (1988): 17-27. JSTOR. 14 Dec. 2011. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/ 25512722>.

McMinn, Joseph. “Versions of Banville: Versions of Modernism.” Contemporary Irish Fiction: Themes, Tropes, Theories. Eds. Liam Harte and Michael Parker. London: Macmillan, 2000. 79-99.

Moran, Heather Maureen. ‘Making Strange:’ The Art and Science of Selfhood in the Works of John Banville. Milwaukee, Wisconsin: Bell & Howell Information and Learning, 2000.

Nicol, Bran. “Postmodernism.” A Companion to Modernist Literature and Culture. Oxford: Blackwell, 2006. 565-570.

“Nicolaus Copernicus.” Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica Online. Encyclopædia Britannica Inc., 2011. Web. 11 Dec. 2011. <http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/ 136591/Nicolaus-Copernicus>.

Opperman, Serpil. “The Interplay Between Historicism and Textuality: Postmodern Histories.” Journal of Faculty Letters. 16.1 (1999): 13-27.

Opperman, Serpil. “Historicist Inquiry in The New Historicism and British Historiographic Metafiction.” Journal of Faculty Letters 15.1 (1998): 39-52.

Patten, Eve. “Contemporary Irish Fiction.” The Cambridge Companion to the Irish Novel. Ed. John Wilson Foster. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2006. 259-275.

Rilke, Rainer Maria. Duino Elegies and the Sonnets to Orpheus. Trans. A. Poulin Jr. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company Boston, 1977.

Rimmon-Kenan, Shlomith. Narrative Fiction: Contemporary Poetics. 1983. London: Routledge, 1999.

Rosen, Edward. “The Commentariolus of Copernicus.” The History of Science Society 3 (1937): 123-141. JSTOR. 14 Dec. 2011. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/301584>.

Rosen, Edward. Rev. of “Georg Joachim Rhetikus, 1514-1574. Eine Bio-Bibliographie. Band II: Quellen und Bibliographie.” Karl Heinz Burmeister. Isis 60.1 (1969): 117-119. JSTOR. 14 Dec. 2011. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/229033> .

Scott, James B. “Parrot as Paradigms: Infinite Deferral of Meaning in ‘Flaubert’s Parrot’.” A Review of International English Literature 21.3 (1990). 57-68.

Sokal, Alan and Jean Bricmont. Fashionable Nonsense: Postmodern Intellectuals’ Abuse of Science. New York: Picador, 1998.

Teske, Armin. The History of Physics and the Philosophy of Science: Selected Essays. Warszawa: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich, 1972.

Teske, Joanna Klara. Philosophy in Fiction. Lublin: Maria Curie-Skłodowska UP, 2008.

Voekel, James R. Johannes Kepler and the New Astronomy. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1999.

Waugh, Patricia. Metafiction: The Theory and Practice of Self-Conscious Fiction. London: Routledge, 2001.

White, Hayden. “The Historical Text as Literary Artifact.” Tropics of Discourse: Essays in Cultural Criticism. Baltimore: The John Hopkins UP, 1985. 81-100.

Opublikowane
2019-10-21
Dział
Artykuły