The influence of personality and social background upon the portrait of an autonomous language learner: The study of Higher Primary foreign language learners

Izabela Batyra

doi:10.18290/rh.2015.63.11-2

Izabela Batyra The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Faculty of Humanities

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18290/rh.2015.63.11-2

Keywords: autonomous learner; successful language learner; EFL classroom; social environment; personality factor; extroversion/introversion; motivation

Abstract

Recent ministerial requirements in the core curriculum of general education, demand of teachers, and particularly language teachers that they create such environment in and beyond the classroom in which learners have an opportunity to gain the ability to plan, organize, evaluate as well as take responsibility for their own learning process. This phenomenon, known as learner autonomy, is the key to successful language learning.

Success in foreign language learning evidently correlates with autonomous learning, as evidenced by numerous discussions in literature, Borg and Al-Busaidi (2012), Nunan (1991), Omaggio (1978), Rubin and Thompson (1983). What makes an autonomous and thus successful foreign language learner? This is a highly complex process which encompasses a variety of variable factors such as learner attitude towards a foreign language, learner motivation and organizational skills as well as individual characteristics devoted to age, gender, learner cognitive and learning styles, the choice of learning and communication strategies, intelligence, memory and various disorders which may hamper the development of autonomy. This paper aims at demonstrating how learner personality and social background influence learner autonomy in and off the classroom setting.

The paper is supported by the study, carried out in 2013/2014, of various forms of autonomous behaviours generated by four English teachers and 115 English learners at the age of 11, 12 and 13 from two school backgrounds who were intensively observed during English lessons for a period of nine months and interviewed on the basis of the questionnaires. Since the study is devoted to various aspects of autonomous learning, only the data concerning an autonomous language learner is presented in this paper.

References

Benson, Phil. 2003. “Learner autonomy in the classroom.” In David Nunan (ed.). Practical English language teaching, 289–308. New York: McGraw Hill.

Benson, Phil. 2013. Teaching and researching autonomy (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

Borg, Simom, and Saleh Al-Busaidi (2012). Learner autonomy: English language teachers’ beliefs and practices. ELT Research Paper 12–07. London: British Council.

Boud, David. 1988. Developing Student Autonomy in Learning (2nd ed.). New York: Kogan Page.

Brown, H. Douglas. 2007. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching (5th ed.). New York: Longman. Pearson Education.

Bruner, Jerome S. 1978. “The role of dialogue in language acquisition.” In Anne Sinclair, Robert J. Jarvella, and Willem J.M. Levelt (eds.). The Child’s Concept of Language, 241–256). New York: Springer-Verlag.

Busch, Deborah. 1982. “Introversion-extraversion and the EFL proficiency of Japanese students.” Language learning. A journal of research in language studies 32: 109–132).

Dickinson, Leslie. 1992. Learner autonomy 2: Learner training for language learning. Dublin: Authentik.

Esch, Emily. 1997. “Learner training for autonomous language learning.” In Phil Benson and Peter Voller (eds.). Autonomy and independence in language learning, 164–176. London: Longman.

Esch, Emily. 1996. “Promoting learner autonomy: criteria for the selection of appropriate methods.” In Richard Pemberton (eds.). Taking control: autonomy in language learning, 35–48. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

Gass, Susan M., and Larry Selinker. 2008. Second Language Acquisition: An Introductory Course (3rd ed.). Great Britain, New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.

Holec, Henri. 1981. Autonomy in foreign language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.

Kohonen, Viljo. 1992. “Experiential language learning: second language learning as cooperative learner education.” In David Nunan (eds.). Collaborative language learning and teaching, 14–39. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Komorowska, Hanna. 1978. Sukces i niepowodzenie w nauce języka obcego. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Szkolne i Pedagogiczne.

Komorowska, Hanna. 2001. Metodyka nauczania języków obcych. Warszawa: Fraszka Edukacyjna.

Little, David. 1995. “Learning as dialogue: the dependence of learner autonomy on teacher autonomy.” System, 23(2): 175-181.

Nunan, David. 1992. Research Methods in Language Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Omaggio, Alice (1978). “Successful language learners: What do we know about them?” ERIC/ CLL News Bulletin, May, 2-3.

Rubin, Joan, and Irene Thompson. 1983. How to be a more successful language learner. Boston: Heinle cited in Nunan, David. 2000. Language Teaching Methodology, 171. Harlow: Pearson Education Ltd.

Skehan, Peter. 1989. Individual differences in second language learning. London: Edward Arnold.

Wakamoto, Natsumi. 2009. Extroversion/introversion in foreign language learning. Interactions with learner strategy use. Bern: Peter Lang AG.

Wilczyńska, Weronika. 1999. Uczyć się by być nauczanym? O autonomii w przyswajaniu języka obcego. Warszawa, Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.