John Hus In The Pulpit. Between Practicism And Faith
Abstract
In the history of medieval Bohemia, the figure of Jan Hus has its own unique dimension, and his life and work reach far beyond the Czech context. The Hussite theme has grown into a separate specialization in international medieval studies. Jan Hus has had several biographies so far, and the latest work by Pavel Soukup will probably not be the last. What distinguishes the book from its predecessors is the particular emphasis on the role of the pulpit and Hus's preaching activity, which is also reflected in its title. For Hus, the pulpit became the basic tool for promoting the ideas of the Reformation. The main issue, therefore, is the question of the grounds for his choice of the pulpit, which determined the life of the Czech reformer. The turning point was Hus’s activity in the pulpit of the Bethlehem Chapel. P. Soukup emphasizes the practicality of the pulpit, the only mass medium capable of propagating ideological content, and he rightly calls the Bethlehem Chapel “a unique center of reform”. Let us add, however, to the author’s arguments that Hus chose the pulpit not only for practical but equally ideological reasons. The choice of the pulpit by Hus is a belief in the effectiveness of sermons, the power of words, and the performative function of speech. In his sermons, Hus quoted the main metaphor from the sermon that we know from the foundation document of the Bethlehem Chapel, namely the word of God compared to a seed (semen, semeno, sieme). According to one of his sermons, unlike the Mass, only a worthy sermon makes the souls of some unite in love with Christ. The adopted framework of the biography did not encourage detailed comments. It is, however, to the author’s merit that he traces the life of Hus through the prism of preaching activity.
References
Bartoš, M. František. „Dvě studie o husitských postilách”. Rozpravy Československé akademie věd. Řada společenských věd, nr 4, z. 65, 1955, ss. 1-101.
Bartoš, M. František. „Husův učitel Dr. Jan Štěkna a kaple Betlemská”. Věstník České akademie věd a umění, nr 58, 1949, ss. 5-13.
Bartoš, M. František, Spunar Pavel. Soupis pramenů k literární činnosti M. Jana Husa a M. Jeronýma Pražského. Historický ústav ČSAV, 1965.
Baumann, Winfried. Die Literatur des Mittelalters in Böhmen. Deutsch-lateinisch-tschechische Literatur vom 10. bis zum 15. Jahrhundert. Verlag Oldenbourg, 1978.
Bériou, Nicole. „Latin and the Vernacular Some Remarks about Sermons Delivered on Good Friday during the Thirteenth Century”. Die deutsche Predigt im Mittelalter. Internationales Symposium am Fachbereich Germanistik der Freien Universität Berlin vom 3.-6. Oktober 1989, red. Volker Mertens, Hans-Jochen Schiewer, Verlag Niemeyer, 1992, ss. 268-284.
Bracha, Krzysztof. „Semen est verbum Dei. Postylla Carcer animae przypisywana Janowi Szczeknie”. Amoenitates vel lepores philologiae, red. Roman Laskowski, Roman Mazurkiewicz, Wydawnictwo Lexis, 2007, ss. 61-71.
Bracha, Krzysztof. „Jan Hus jako kaznodzieja i promotor kaznodziejstwa”. Jan Hus. Życie, myśl, dziedzictwo, red. Paweł Kras, Martin Nodl, Wydawnictwo Instytutu Historii PAN, 2017, ss. 167-192.
Bylina, Stanisław. Rewolucja husycka. T. 1-3, Wydawnictwo Instytutu Historii PAN, 2011-2016.
Corbari, Eliana, Vernacular Theology. Dominican Sermons and Audience in Late Medieval Italy. De Gruyter, 2013.
Coufal, Dušan. Turnaj víry. Polemika o kalichach na basilejském koncilu 1431-1433. Filosofia, 2020.
Dobrowolski, T. Paweł. „Fides ex auditu. Uwagi o funkcji kazania w późnym średniowieczu”. Przegląd Historyczny, nr 81, 1990, ss. 27-58.
Fudge, A. Thomas, „Feel this! Jan Hus and the Preaching of Reformation”. The Bohemian Reformation and Religious Practice. T. 4, red. Zdeněk V. David, David R. Holeton, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic Main Library, 2002, ss. 107-126.
Fudge, A. Thomas. „Il predicatore di Jan Hus”. Dizionario de Omiletica, a cura di Manlio Sodi, Achille M. Triacca, Velar, 1998, ss. 684-688.
Fudge, A. Thomas, Jan Hus. Religious Reform and Social Revolution in Bohemia. (International Library of Historical Studies) I.B. Tauris & Co. Ltd, 2010.
Hilsch, Peter. Johannes Hus (um 1370-1415). Prediger Gottes und Ketzer. Verlag Friedrich Pustet, 1999.
Smrčka Jakub, Vybíral Zdeněk, red. Jan Hus 1415 a 600 letpoté. VII. Mezinárodni husitologické sympozium Tábor 23.-25. červena 2015. Husitsky Tabor. Suplementum 4. Husitské muzeum v Táboře, 2015.
Kras, Paweł, Nodl Martin. „Wstęp: 600 lat sporu o Jana Husa – próba bilansu”. Jan Hus. Życie, myśl, dziedzictwo, red. Paweł Kras, Martin Nodl, Wydawnictwo Instytutu Historii PAN 2017, ss. 13-52.
Marek, Jindřích. Jakoubek ze Stříbra a počátky utrakvistického kazatelství v českých zemích. Studie o Jakoubkově postile z let 1413-1414. Národní knihovna České republiky, 2011.
Molnár, Amadeo. „Aktywność ludu w ruchu reformatorskim. Świadectwo kazań husyckich”. Kultura elitarna a kultura masowa w Polsce późnego średniowiecza, red. Bronisław Geremek, Ossolineum, 1978, ss. 77-119.
Perett, K. Marcela. „John Příbram and his Vernacular Treatises. Equipping the Laity in Battle against Hussite Radicals”. Christianity and Culture in the Middle Ages. Essays to Honor John van Engen, red. David C. Mengel, Lisa Wolverton, University of Notre Dame Press, 2015, ss. 419-435.
Šmahel, František. „Antytezy czeskiej kultury późnego średniowiecza”. Kwartalnik Historyczny, nr 4, t. 90, 1983, ss. 719-727.
Šmahel, František. Die Hussitischen Revolution. T. 1-3, Hahnsche Buchhandlung, 2002.
Šmahel, František. Husitská revoluce. T. 1-4, Karolinum, 1993.
Šmahel, František. Husitské Čechy, Struktury, procesy, ideje. NLN – Nakladatelství Lidové noviny, 2001.
Šmahel, František. Jan Hus. Život a dílo. Argo, 2013.
Šmahel, František. Psané a mluvené slovo ve službách rané české reformace. Šmahel, František. Mezi středověkem a renesancí. Argo, 2002, ss. 215-230.
Šmahel, František. „Słowo pisane i mówione w służbie reformy husyckiej”. Kultura pisma w średniowieczu. Znane problemy, nowe metody, red. Anna Adamska, Paweł Kras, Wydawnictwo KUL, 2013, ss. 175-194.
Soukup, Pavel. „Ne verbum Dei in nobis suffocetur... Kommunikationstechniken von Predigern des Frühen Hussitismus”. Bohemia, nr 48, 2008, ss. 54-82.
Soukup, Pavel. „Die Predigt als Mittel religiöser Erneuerung: Böhmen um 1400”. Böhmen und das Deutsche Reich. Ideen- und Kulturtransfer im Vergleich (13.-16. Jahrhundert), red. Eva Schlotheuber, Hubert Seibert, Oldenbourg, 2009, ss. 235-264.
Soukup, Pavel. „Jan Hus as a Preacher”. A Companion to Jan Hus, ed. František Šmahel, Ota Pavlíček, Brill, 2015, ss. 96-129.
Soukup, Pavel. Jan Hus. Kohlhammer, 2014.
Soukup, Pavel. Jan Hus. Život a smrt kazatele. NLN – Nakladatelství Lidové noviny, 2015.
Soukup, Pavel. Reformní kazatelství a Jakoubek ze Stříbra. Filosofia, 2011.
Soukup, Pavel. Jan Hus. The Life and Death of a Preacher. Purdue University Press, 2020.
Spunar, Pavel. Repertorium auctorum Bohemorum provectum idearum post Universitatem Pragensem conditam illustrans. T. 1, Ossolineum, 1985.
Tříška, Josef. Životopisný slovník předhusitské Pražské univerzity 1348-1409. Univerzita Karlova, 1981.
Tříška, Josef. Přispěvky k středověké literární universitě. De auctoribus et operibus universitatis Pragensis medii aevi capitula. Universita Karlova, 1968.
Vidmanová, Anežka. „Hus als Prediger”. Communio Viatorum, nr 19, 1976, ss. 65-66.
Vidmanová, Anežka. „Husova tzv. Postilla De tempore (1408/9)”. Listy filologické, nr 94, 1971, cz. 1, ss. 7-22.
Watson, Nicholas. „Censorship and Cultural Change in Late Medieval England. Vernacular Theology, the Oxford Translation Debate and Arundel’s Constitutions of 1409”. Speculum, nr 70, 1995, ss. 822-864.
Wolny, Jerzy. „Kaznodziejstwo”. Dzieje teologii katolickiej w Polsce. T. 1. Średniowiecze, red. Marian Rechowicz, Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL, 1974, ss. 273-308.
Copyright (c) 2022 Roczniki Humanistyczne
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.