Definitions and the Growth of Knowledge: The Main Ideas
Abstract
Are definitions useful in an empirical knowledge-gaining process? What roles do definitions play in the process of the growth of empirical knowledge? Two attitudes towards definitions can be distinguished in the history of the theory of definitions. According to the first and positive one, definitions have been useful in science. The second attitude has been a critical one.
I try to defend the view about the usefulness of definitions, on the one hand, by application of Hilary Putnam’s theory of reference of natural kind terms. On the other hand, Karl Popper’s fallibilism is implemented to the theory of definitions, especially to the theory of real definitions.
The structure of this text is as follows: (I) the origin and the development of the theory of definitions, (II) Popperian antidefinitionism, (III) the theory of definitions and the Putnamian theory of meaning and (IV) the theory of stipulative, lexical and persuasive definitions.
References
Ajdukiewicz K., 1958, Three Concepts of Definition, “Logique et Analyse” (1) 3–4, pp. 115–126.
Ajdukiewicz K., 1960, Zarys Logiki (An Outline of Logic), Warszawa: Państwowe Zakłady Wydawnictw Szkolnych.
Ajdukiewicz K., 1974, Pragmatic Logic, Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Ajdukiewicz K., 1984, On Definitions, “Dialectics and Humanism” (11) 2, pp. 235–256.
Ajdukiewicz K., 1985a, Definicja (Definition), in: id., Język i poznanie (Language and Cognition), vol. 1, Warszawa: Polish Scientific Publishers, pp. 44–61.
Ajdukiewicz K., 1985b, Definicja (Definition), in: id., Język i poznanie (Language and Cognition), vol. 1, Warszawa: Polish Scientific Publishers, pp. 243–248.
Bocheński I.M., 1961, A History of Formal Logic, transl. and ed. I. Thomas, Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.
Boyd R., 1991, Realism, Anti-foundationalism and the Enthusiasm for Natural Kinds, “Philosophical Studies” (61) 1–2, pp. 127–148.
Boyd R., 2000, Kinds as the “Workmanship of Men”: Realism, Constructivism, and Natural Kinds, in: Rationality, Realism, Revision. Proceedings of the 3rd International Congress of the Society for Analytical Philosophy, September 15–18, 1997 in Munich, Perspectives in Analytical Philosophy, (ed.) J. Nida-Ruemelin, vol. 23, Berlin—New York: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 52–89.
Chapuis A., Gupta A. (eds.), 2000, Circularity, Definition and Truth, New Delhi: Indian Council of Philosophical Research.
Charles D., 2005, Aristotle on Meaning and Essence, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
David M. (ed.), 1993, Definitions (Special Issue) “Philosophical Studies” (72) 2–3, pp. 111–282.
Fetzer J.H., Shatz D., Schlesinger G.N. (eds.), 1991, Definitions and Definability: Philosophical Perspectives, vol. 216, Dordrecht—Boston—London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Gorsky D.P., 1981, Definition. Logico-Methodological Problems, Moscow: Progress Publishers.
Gupta A., Belnap N., 1993, The Revision Theory of Truth, Cambridge, Mass.—London: A Bradford Book—The MIT Press.
Gupta A., 2006, Empiricism and Experience, Oxford—New York: Oxford University Press.
Gupta A., 2011, Truth, Meaning, Experience, Oxford—New York: Oxford University Press.
Kamiński S., 1955–57, Rola Locke’a i Condillaca w dziejach teorii definicji (The Role of Locke and Condillac in the History of the Theory of Definitions), “Roczniki Filozoficzne” (5) 4, pp. 67–101.
Kamiński S., 1958a, Gergonne’a teoria definicji (Gergonne’s Theory of Definitions), Lublin: The Learned Society of the Catholic University of Lublin.
Kamiński S., 1958b, Hobbesa teoria definicji (Hobbes’ Theory of Definitions), “Studia Logica” (7) 1, pp. 43–69.
Kamiński S., 1992, Nauka i metoda. Pojęcie nauki i klasyfikacja nauk (Science and Method. The Concept of Science and the Classification of Science), (ed.) A. Bronk, Lublin: The Learned Society of the Catholic University of Lublin.
Kamiński S., 1994, Rola definicji w systemie scholastycznej metafizyki (The Role of Definitions in the System of Scholastic Metaphysics) in: M.A. Krąpiec, S. Kamiński, Z teorii i metodologii metafizyki (The Theory and Methodology of Metaphysics), Lublin: The Catholic University of Lublin Press, pp. 341–354.
Kamiński S., 1997, Definicja (Definition), in: Leksykon filozofii klasycznej (The Companion of Classical Philosophy), (ed.) J. Herbut, Lublin: The Learned Society of the Catholic University of Lublin, pp. 102–104.
Kornblith H., 1993, Inductive Inference and its Natural Ground. An Essay in Naturalistic Epistemology, Cambridge, Mass.—London: A Bradford Book—The MIT Press.
Kublikowski R., 2005, Circular Definition, “Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric” (8) 21, pp. 135–142.
Kublikowski R., 2009, Definition within the Structure of Argumentation, in: “Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric,” Special Issue on Informal Logic and Argumentation Theory, (ed.) M. Koszowy, (16) 29, pp. 229–244.
Kublikowski R., 2013, Definicje i rozwój wiedzy. Od Arystotelesa do Putnama (Definitions and the Growth of Knowledge: from Aristotle to Putnam), Lublin: The Learned Society of the John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin.
Kublikowski R., 2016, Is Kazimierz Ajdukiewicz’s Concept of a Real Definition Still Important?, “Axioms” (5) 21, pp. 1–7.
Kwiatkowski T., 1969, Poznanie naukowe u Arystotelesa. Niektóre poglądy teoretyczne (The Scientific Knowledge in Aristotle. Selected Theoretical Views), Warszawa: Polish Scientific Publishers.
Macagno F., Walton D., 2008a, Persuasive Definitions: Values, Meanings and Implicit Disagreements, “Informal Logic” (28) 3, pp. 203–228.
Macagno F., Walton D., 2008b, The Argumentative Structure of Persuasive Definitions, “Ethical Theory and Moral Practice” (11) 5, pp. 525–549.
Matthews A., 1998, A Diagram of Definition. The Defining of Definition, Assen: Van Gorcum.
Popper K.R., 1979, Objective Knowledge. An Evolutionary Approach, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Popper K.R., 1994, Knowledge and the Body Mind Problem. In Defence of Interaction, London—New York: Routledge.
Popper K.R., 2002a (1934), The Logic of Scientific Discovery, London—New York: Routledge.
Popper K.R., 2002b (1963), Conjectures and Refutations, London—New York: Routledge.
Popper K.R., 2002c (1974), Unended Quest, London—New York: Routledge.
Popper K.R., 2003a (1945), The Open Society and its Enemies, vol. 1, London—New York: Routledge.
Popper K.R., 2003b (1945), The Open Society and its Enemies, vol. 2, London—New York: Routledge.
Putnam H., 1975, Mind, Language and Reality. Philosophical Papers, vol. 2, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Putnam H., 1979, Mathematics, Matter and Method. Philosophical Papers, vol. 1, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Putnam H., 1981, Reason, Truth and History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Putnam H., 1983, Realism and Reason. Philosophical Papers, vol. 3, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Putnam H., 1987, The Many Faces of Realism, Chicago—La Salle, Ill.: Open Court.
Putnam H., 1988, Representation and Reality, Cambridge, Mass.—London: A Bradford Book— The MIT Press.
Putnam H., 1990, Realism with a Human Face, (ed.) J. Conant, Cambridge, Mass.—London: Harvard University Press.
Putnam H., 1994, Words and Life, (ed.) J. Conant, Cambridge, Mass.—London: Harvard University Press.
Robinson R., 1950, Definition, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Schiappa E., 2003, Defining Reality. Definitions and the Politics of Meaning, Carbondale—Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.
Walton D., 2001, Persuasive Definitions and Public Policy Arguments, “Argumentation and Advocacy” (37) 3, pp. 117–132.
Walton D., 2005, Deceptive Arguments Containing Persuasive Language and Persuasive Definitions, “Argumentation” (19) 2, pp. 159–186.
Walton D., 2008, Arguing from Definition to Verbal Classification: The Case of Redefining Planet to Exclude Pluto, “Informal Logic” (28) 2, pp. 129–154.
Walton D., Macagno F., 2008, Reasoning from Classifications and Definitions, “Argumentation” (23) 1, pp. 81–107.
Weingartner P., 1989, Definitions in Russell, in The Vienna Circle and in The Lvov-Warsaw School, in: The Vienna Circle and The Lvov-Warsaw School, (ed.) K. Szaniawski, vol. 38, Dordrecht—Boston—London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 225–247.
Weingartner P., 1991, A Note on Aristotle’s Theory of Definition and Scientific Explanation, in: Existence and Explanation, (ed.) W. Spohn et al., Dordrecht—Boston—London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 207–217.
Wiggins D., 2007, Three Moments in the Theory of Definitions or Analysis: its Possibility, its Aim or Aims, and its Limit or Terminus, “Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society” (107) 1, pp. 73–109.
Acid. Available online: https://www.britannica.com/science/acid (Accessed on 25 February 2017).
Chemical element. Available online: https://www.britannica.com/science/chemical-element (Accessed on 25 February 2017).
Definitions. Available online: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/definitions (Accessed on 25 February 2017).
Copyright (c) 2016 Summarium
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.