The Question of the Psychological Structure of Affects
Abstract
The article examines the nature of affect development, its regression and implication in the theories of different psychological approaches of modern psychology. Benefits and comparative significance of affects for the whole psychobiological activity are presented and described. The mechanisms of affect influence on behaviour and personal reactions to external stimuli are defined. Affects become specific as their meanings and circumstances are associated with certain situations, reactions, feelings, bodily gestures, facial expressions and words. They are associated with certain objects and states of the Ego and can acquire protective functions. The affect psychological structure is such that the given emotional state influences the psyche in general, and in particular, the consciousness.
References
Аффект [Электронный ресурс] http://psymedcare.ru/affekt#chto-takoe-affekt [Affekt (Elektronnyy resurs) http://psymedcare.ru/affekt#chto-takoe-affekt].
Архангородский М.Г. К вопросу о психологической структуре психической травмы с точки зрения аналитической психологии, Пенза [Электронный ресурс] http://nar kolog-penza.narod.ru/2_1_5.htm [M. G. Arkhangorodskiy. K voprosu o psikhologicheskoy strukturie psikhichieskoy travmy s tochki zrieniya analitichieskoy psikhologii, (Penza, (Elektronnyi resurs) http://narkolog-penza.narod.ru/2_1_5.htm].
Ежов А. [Электронный ресурс] http://psy4psy.ru/identichnost_i_affekty [A. Yezhov (Elektronnyi resurs)].
Кристал Г., Кристал Д. Интеграция и самоисцеление. Аффект, травма и алекситимия. Москва: Институт общегуманитарных исследований, 2017. [G. Kristal, D. Kristal. Integratsiya i samoistseleniye. Affekt, travma i aleksitimiya. Moskva: Institut Obshchegumanitarnykh Issledovaniy, 2017].
Леонтьев А.Н. Потребности, мотивы и эмоции. Психология эмоций (Тексты). Под ред. В.К. Вилюнаса, Ю.Б. Гипенрейтер. Москва: Издательство Московского Университета, 1984 [A.N. Leontev. Potrebnosti, motivy i emotsii. Psychology of emotions. Texts. Ed. V.K. Viliunas, Yu.B. Hipenreiter. Moskva: Izdatelstvo Moskovskogo Universiteta, 1984].
Малинина М.В. Энергию гнева – в конструктивное русло (Электронный ресурс) https://www.b17.ru/article/87068/ [M.V. Malinina. Energiyu gnieva – v konstruktivnoye ruslo (Elektronnyj resurs)].
Dictionary of the English language. Fourth edition. Houghton Mifflin Company, 2000.
Emde R.N. The prerepresentational self and its affective core. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1983.
Jacobson E. “The affects and their pleasureunpleasure qualities in relation to psychic discharge processes.” In Drives, Affect, Behavior. Ed. R.M. Loewenstein, 38-66. New York: International Universities Press, 1953.
McDougall J. Fheaters of the Body. New York: W.W. Norton Co., 1989.
Nemiah J., Freiberger H., Sifneos P. “Alexithymia: a view of the psychosomatic process.” In Modern trends in psychosomatic medicine. Ed. O. Hill, 430-440. Butterworths, 1976.
Stern D.N. Implications of infancy research for psychoanalytic theory and practice. In Psychiatry Update II. Ed. L. Grinspoon, 8-12. Washington: American Psychiatric Association, 1983.
Tereshchuk A.D. “Peculiarities of affects in personal psychological development.” Science and Education a New Dimension. Humanities and Social Sciences 5(2017), 24(146): 43-46.
Tustin F. “Autistic objects.” The Internatiional Review of Psycho−Analysis 7(1980), 27-39.
Witwicki W. (ed.). Psychologia. 3 rd. Krakow−Torun, 1, 1946.
Copyright (c) 2018 Roczniki Teologiczne
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.