A dispute over the philosophy of clothes. Cyprian Norwid versus Thomas Carlyle

Karol Samsel

doi:10.18290/sn.2020.38-5en

Karol Samsel University of Warsaw

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18290/sn.2020.38-5en

Abstrakt

Cyprian Norwid’s attitude to the philosophy of clothes developed by Thomas Carlyle in Sartor Resartus may indeed be perceived only as an object of speculation, but undoubtedly the author of Vade-mecum must have been familiar with him (as confirmed in his lectures on Juliusz Słowacki). This article outlines two areas of potential intertextual crossroads between Norwid’s literary motives and the philosophy of life espoused by the legendary Carlyle: one is delimited by the poem Promethidion and a passage from the dialogue Wiesław, which may constitute a polemic with Carlyle’s sartorial philosophy, while another is delineated by Lord Singelworth’s Secret, where the figure and attitude of Singelworth may reveal the eccentricities of Carlyle himself, which is corroborated after Carlyle’s death in 1881, when Norwid began to write his so-called Italian novelettes.

Biogram autora

Karol Samsel, University of Warsaw

Karol Samsel is assistant professor in the Institute of Polish Literature at the Faculty of Polish Studies at the University of Warsaw, where he is head of the Study Unit for the History of Drama in the years 1795-1939. He published in Prace Filologiczne, Pamiętnik Literacki, Studia Norwidiana, and the Yearbook of Conrad Studies (Poland). He is also author of the monograph Norwid – Conrad. Epika w perspektywie modernizmu (Warsaw 2015) and Inwalida intencji. Studia o Norwidzie (Warszawa 2017)

Bibliografia

Bratkowski S., Wstęp, [in:] R.W. Emerson, Eseje, trans. A. Tretiak, vol. 1, Lublin 1997, pp. 5-28.

Brzozowski S., Literatury zachodnie, [in:] Idem, Legenda Młodej Polski. Studia o strukturze duszy kulturalnej. Redakcja II, vol. 1: eds. J. Bahr, S. Góra; vol. 2: ed. T. Podoska, Kraków 1997.

Brzozowski S., Polskie Oberammergau, [in:] Legenda Młodej Polski. Studia o strukturze duszy kulturalnej, vol. 1.

Brzozowski S., Wobec literatury rosyjskiej, [in:] Legenda Młodej Polski, vol. 2.

Burdziej B., ‘Wedle rozmaitości zmiennej kalendarza”. Norwid ‘przemyślony’, “Studia Norwidiana” 34: 2016, pp. 187-227.

Carlyle T., Sartor Resartus. On heroes, hero worship, London 1948.

Carlyle T., Sartor Resartus. Życie i zdania Pana Teufelsdröckha w trzech księgach, trans. S. Wiśniowski, Warszawa 1882.

Corliss JR. F., Norwid and the American Transcendentalists, [in:] Cyprian Norwid. 1821-1883. Poet, thinker, craftsman. A centennial conference, eds. B. Mazur, G. Gömöri, London 1988.

Dambek-Giallelis Z., Tajemnice ‘Tajemnicy lorda Singelworth’, “Studia Norwidiana” 35: 2017, pp. 185-198.

Gömöri G., Cyprian Norwid’s Image of England and America, “The Polish Review” 46 (2001), no. 3, pp. 271-281.

Hugo V., Les Misérables, [in:] Idem, The Essential Victor Hugo, trans. E.H. Blackmore, A.M. Blackmore, Oxford 2004.

Halkiewicz-Sojak G., Norwidowska legenda o Byronie. Refleksy legendy w innych utworach Norwida, [in:] Idem, Byron w twórczości Norwida, Toruń 1994, pp. 106-117.

Kadyjewska A., ‘Świata – tego książę’. O Norwidowskich obliczach szatana, “Studia Norwidiana” 17-18: 1999-2000, pp. 21-48.

Lijewska E., Kuzynki Norwida. Euphemia Tudor Kleczkowska i Ketty Kleczkowska-Kierkpatrick, “Studia Norwidiana” 34: 2016, pp. 169-185.

Małecka A., Carlylean inspirations in Polish modernist philosophy, Kraków 1993.

Norwid C., Poems, translated from the Polish by Danuta Borchardt in collaboration with Agata Brajerska-Mazur, New York 2011.

Scherer-Virski O., The Modern Polish Short Story, Hague 1955.

Szypowska I., ‘Przewrotny panegiryk’. Autokompromitacja bohatera, [in:] Idem, Weyssenhoff, Warszawa 1976, pp. 92-96.

Trojanowiczowa Z., Dambek Z., Kalendarz życia i twórczości Cypriana Norwida, vol. 1: 1821- 1860, Poznań 2007.

Trybuś K., Maska lorda Singelworth, “Studia Norwidiana” 14 (1996), pp. 95-103.

Wiśniowski S., Charakter i pisma Tomasza Carlyle’a, “Ateneum. Pismo naukowe i literackie” 1 (1882), pp. 50-69, 269-297.