When the smile is not enough: The interactive role of smiling and facial characteristics in forming judgments about trustworthiness and dominance
Abstrakt
People often assess other people’s personality traits merely based on their emotional expression or the physical features of their faces. In this paper we review the evidence of biases when formulating judgments of trustworthiness and confidence from two types of facial characteristics. One line of evidence documents the influence of emotional expressions representing an individual’s motivational state and reflecting agents’ intentions. People’s judgment about the trustworthiness or attractiveness of others largely depends on the emotions expressed. The second line of evidence describes how facial appearance (e.g., cues of physical strength or resemblance to one’s own face) affects the inferences of personality traits. The two experiments described in this paper investi-gated the interplay between these two factors (i.e., facial features and emotional expression) and their combined influence on social judgments. We hypothesized and tested how both facial features conveying trustworthiness (vs. dominance) and a smiling (vs. neutral) expression influence judgments of trustworthiness and confidence (Study 1). We also tested the influence of facial resemblance in an interaction with a smiling individual when forming judgments (Study 2). We found that relatively static facial features conveying trust had more impact on judgments of trustworthiness than emotional expressions, yet emotional expressions seem to be more impactful for judgments of dominance. The results of both studies are discussed from a sociocognitive perspective.
Bibliografia
Abele, A. E., & Wojciszke, B. (2007). Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 751.
Abele, A. E., & Wojciszke, B. (2014). Communal and agentic content in social cognition: A Dual Perspective Model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 195-255. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-800284-1.00004-7
Andersen, S. M., & Baum, A. (1994). Transference in interpersonal relations: Inferences and affect based on significant-other representations. Journal of Personality, 62(4), 459-497. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1994.tb00306.x
Andersen, S. M., & Cole, S. W. (1990). “Do I know you?” The role of significant others in general social perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(3), 384-399.
Bailenson, J. N., Iyengar, S., Yee, N., & Collins, N. A. (2008). Facial similarity between voters and candidates causes influence. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75(5), 935-961. DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfn06
Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., & McCabe, K. (1995). Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games and Economic Behavior, 10(1), 122-142. DOI: 10.1006/game.1995.1027
Bonnefon, J. F., Hopfensitz, A., & De Neys, W. (2013). The modular nature of trustworthiness detection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 143-150. DOI: 10.1037/a0028930
Bruce, V., & Young, A. (2012). Face perception. London: Psychology Press.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ, US: Erlbaum.
Costa, M., Gomez, A., Barat, E., Lio, G., Duhamel, J. R., & Sirigu, A. (2018). Implicit preference for human trustworthy faces in macaque monkeys. Nature Communications, 9(1), 4529. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-06987-4
Crivelli, C., & Fridlund, A. J. (2018). Facial displays are tools for social influence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(5), 388-399. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.02.006
DeBruine, L. M. (2002). Facial resemblance enhances trust. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 269(1498), 1307-1312. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2034
DeBruine, L. M. (2004). Resemblance to self increases the appeal of child faces to both men and women. Evolution & Human Behavior, 25, 142-154. DOI: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.03.003
DeBruine, L. M. (2005). Trustworthy but not lust-worthy: Context-specific effects of facial resemblance. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 272(1566), 919-922. DOI:10.1098/rspb.2004.3003
DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., & Perrett, D. I. (2005). Women’s attractiveness judgments of self--resembling faces change across the menstrual cycle. Hormones and Behavior, 47(4), 379-383. DOI: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2004.11.006
Doliński, D. (2018). Is psychology still a science of behaviour? Social Psychological Bulletin, 13(2), e25025. DOI: 10.5964/spb.v13i2.25025
Ekman, P. (2007). Emotions revealed: Recognizing faces and feelings to improve communication and emotional life. New York, NJ, US: Henry Holt and Company.
Ewing, L., Caulfield, F., Read, A., & Rhodes, G. (2015). Perceived trustworthiness of faces drives trust behaviour in children. Developmental Science, 18(2), 327-334. DOI: 10.1111/desc.12218
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149-1160.
Fridlund, A. J. (1994). Human facial expression: An evolutionary view. San Diego: Academic Press.
Gill, D., Garrod, O. G. B., Jack, R. E., & Schyns, P. G. (2014). Facial movements strategically camouflage involuntary social signals of face morphology. Psychological Science, 25(5), 1079-1086. DOI: 10.1177/0956797614522274
Hassin, R., & Trope, Y. (2000). Facing faces: Studies on the cognitive aspects of physiognomy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(5), 837-852. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.78.5.837
Haxby, J. V., Hoffman, E. A., & Gobbini, M. I. (2000). The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(6), 223-233. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01482-0
Hehman, E., Flake, J. K., & Freeman, J. B. (2015). Static and dynamic facial cues differentially affect the consistency of social evaluations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(8), 1123-1134. DOI: 10.1177/0146167215591495
Hess, U., Adams R. B., Jr., & Kleck, R. E. (2009). The categorical perception of emotions and traits. Social Cognition, 27(2), 320-326. DOI: 10.1521/soco.2009.27.2.320
Hess, U., Blairy, S., & Kleck, R. E. (2000). The influence of facial emotion displays, gender, and ethnicity on judgments of dominance and affiliation. Journal of Nonverbal Behaviour, 24, 265-283.
Horstmann, G. (2003). What do facial expressions convey: Feeling states, behavioral intentions, or action requests? Emotion, 3(2), 150-166. DOI: 10.1037/1528-3542.3.2.150
Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., Little, A. C., & Feinberg, D. R. (2007). The valence of experiences with faces influences generalized preferences. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 5(1), 119-129. DOI: 10.1556/JEP.2007.1001
Knutson, B. (1996). Facial expressions of emotion influence interpersonal trait inferences. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 20(3), 165-182. DOI: 10.1007/BF02281954
Martin, J., Rychlowska, M., Wood, A., & Niedenthal, P. (2017). Smiles as multipurpose social signals. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(11), 864-877. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.08.007
Montepare, J. M., & Dobish, H. (2003). The contribution of emotion perceptions and their overgeneralizations to trait impressions. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 27(4), 237-254. DOI: 10.1023/A:1027332800296
Olivola, C. Y., Sussman, A. B., Tsetsos, K., Kang, O. E., & Todorov, A. (2012). Republicans prefer republican-looking leaders: Political facial stereotypes predict candidate electoral success among right-leaning voters. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(5), 605-613. DOI: 10.1177/1948550611432770
Olszanowski, M., Kaminska, O. K., & Winkielman, P. (2018). Mixed matters: Fluency impacts trust ratings when faces range on valence but not on motivational implications. Cognition and Emotion, 32(5), 1032-1051. DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2017.1386622
Olszanowski, M., Pochwatko, G., Kukliński, K., Ścibor-Rylski, M., Lewinski, P., & Ohme, R. (2015). Warsaw set of emotional facial expression pictures: A validation study of facial display photographs. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(1516), 1-8. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01516
Oosterhof, N. N., & Todorov, A. (2008). The functional basis of face evaluation. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(32), 11087-11092. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0805664105
Oosterhof, N. N., & Todorov, A. (2009). Shared perceptual basis of emotional expressions and trustworthiness impressions from faces. Emotion, 9(1), 128-133. DOI: 10.1037/a0014520.
Platek, S. M., Burch, R. L., Panyavin, I. S., Wasserman, B. H., & Gallup, G. G., Jr (2002). Reactions to children’s faces: Resemblance affects males more than females. Evolution & Human Behavior, 23, 159-166. DOI: 10.1016/S1090-5138(01)00094-0
Rezlescu, C., Duchaine, B., Olivola, C. Y., & Chater, N. (2012). Unfakeable facial configurations affect strategic choices in trust games with or without information about past behavior. PloS ONE, 7(3), e34293. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034293
Rychlowska, M., Jack, R. E., Garrod, O. G. B., Schyns, P. G., Martin, J. D., & Niedenthal, P. M. (2017). Functional smiles: Tools for love, sympathy, and war. Psychological Science, 28(9), 1259-1270. DOI: 10.1177/0956797617706082
Stolier, R. M., Hehman, E., & Freeman, J. B. (2018). A dynamic structure of social trait space. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(3), 197-200. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.12.003
Tanaka, J. W., & Simonyi, D. (2016). The “parts and wholes” of face recognition: A review of the literature. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(10), 1876-1889.
Todorov, A. (2017). Face value: The irresistible influence of first impressions. Princeton, Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Todorov, A., Dotsch, R., Porter, J., Oosterhof, N., & Falvello, V. (2013).Validation of data-driven computational models of social perception of faces. Emotion, 13(4), 724-738. DOI: 10.1037/a0032335
Todorov, A., & Oosterhof, N. N. (2011). Modeling social perception of faces. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 28(2), 117-122. DOI: 10.1109/MSP.2010.940006
Todorov, A., Pakrashi, M., & Oosterhof, N. N. (2009). Evaluating faces on trustworthiness after minimal time exposure. Social Cognition, 27(6), 813-833. DOI: 10.1521/soco.2009.27.6.813
Todorov, A., Said, C. P., Engell, A. D., & Oosterhof, N. N. (2008). Understanding evaluation of faces on social dimensions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(12), 455-460. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.10.001
Todorov, A., & Uleman, J. S. (2003). The efficiency of binding spontaneous trait inferences to actors’ faces. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(6), 549-562. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00059-3
Van Kleef, G. A., Van Doorn, E. A., Heerdink, M. V., & Koning, L. F. (2011). Emotion is for influence. European Review of Social Psychology, 22(1), 114-163. DOI: 10.1080/10463283.2011.627192
Verosky, S. C., & Todorov, A. (2010). Generalization of affective learning about faces to perceptually similar faces. Psychological Science, 21(6), 779-785. DOI: 10.1177/0956797610371965
Verosky, S. C., & Todorov, A. (2013). When physical similarity matters: Mechanisms underlying affective learning generalization to the evaluation of novel faces. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(4), 661-669. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2013.02.004
Wilson, J. P., & Rule, N. O. (2015). Facial trustworthiness predicts extreme criminal-sentencing outcomes. Psychological Science, 26(8), 1325-1331. DOI: 10.1177/0956797615590992
Winkielman, P., Olszanowski, M., & Gola, M. (2015). Faces in-between: Evaluations reflect the interplay of facial features and task-dependent fluency. Emotion, 15(2), 232-242. DOI: 10.1037/emo0000036
Wojciszke, B., & Abele, A. E. (2008). The primacy of communion over agency and its reversals in evaluations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1139-1147. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.549
Ybarra, O., Chan, E., Park, H., Burnstein, E., Monin, B., & Stanik, C. (2008). Life’s recurring challenges and the fundamental dimensions: An integration and its implications for cultural differences and similarities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1083-1092. DOI:10.1002/ejsp.559
Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(2, Pt.2), 1-27.
Zebrowitz, L. A., & Montepare, J. M. (2008). Social psychological face perception: Why appearance matters. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 1497-1517. DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00109.x
Copyright (c) 2019 Roczniki Psychologiczne
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
