The faces of professional experience in clinical assessment. A Comment on Trzebińska and Filipiak (2015)

  • Lidia Cierpiałkowska Institute of Psychology, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań
  • Emilia Soroko Institute of Psychology, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań
Słowa kluczowe: clinical assessment; assessment procedure; professional experience; clinical supervision

Abstrakt

The comment addresses issues concerning the importance of professional experience for various kinds of assessment carried out in the field of clinical psychology. The influence of clinical experience is understood broadly and considered in connection with assessment procedure leading to differential and structural-functional diagnosis, with special attention to the context of the diagnostocianʼs personality. The limitations that stem from monitoring focused exclusively on cognitive processes are also discussed.

Bibliografia

Beatty, P. (1995). Understanding the standarized/non-standarized interviewing controversy. Journal of Official Statistics, 11(2), 147-160.
Berg, E. (2008). Clinical practice: Between explicit and tacit knowledge, between dialogue and technique. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology, 15(2), 151-157.
Brammer, L. M. i MacDonald, G. (2003). The helping relationship. Process and skills. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
Butterworth, T. (2006). Foreword. W: L. Golding i I. Gray (red.), Continuing professional development for clinical psychologists (s. VII-IX). Oxford: The British Psychological Society and Blackwell Publishing.
Cierpiałkowska, L. (2007). Psychopatologia. Warszawa: Scholar.
Cierpiałkowska, L. i Sęk, H. (2005). Psychologia kliniczna i psychopatologia – wzajemne zależności. W: H. Sęk (red.), Psychologia kliniczna (t. 1). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Eva, K. W., Armson, H., Holmboe, E., Lockyer, J., Loney, E., Mann, K. i Sargeant, J. (2012). Factors influencing responsiveness to feedback: On the interplay between fear, confidence, and reasoning processes. Advances in Health Science Education. Theory and Practice, 17(1), 15-26, doi: 10.1007/s10459-011-9290-7
Garb, H. N. (2010). The social psychology of clinical judgment. W: J. E. Maddux i J. P. Tagney (red.), Social psychological fundations of clinical psychology (s. 297-311). New York: Guilford Publications, Inc.
Groth-Marnat, G. (2003). Handbook of psychological assessment. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Hayes, B. K. i Chen, T. H. (2008). Clinical expertise and reasoning with uncertain categories. Psychonomic Bulletin Review, 15(5), 1002-1007, doi: 10.3758/PBR.15.5.1002
Overholser, J. C. (2009). Clinical expertise: A preliminary attempt to clarify its core elements. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 40(3), 131-139, doi: 10.1007/s10879-009-9129-1
Paluchowski, J. W. (2007). Diagnoza psychologiczna – proces, narzędzia, standardy. Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Akademickie i Profesjonalne.
Trull, T. J. i Prinstein, M. J. (2013). Clinical psychology. Belmont: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
Trzebińska, E., Filipiak, M. (2015). Rola doświadczenia klinicznego w diagnozie zdrowia psychicznego. Roczniki Psychologiczne, 18(1), 59-76.
Westen, D. i Weinberger, J. (2004). When clinical description becomes statistical prediction. American Psychologist, 59(7), 595-613, doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.59.7.595
Westen, D. i Weinberger, J. (2005). In praise of clinical judgment: Meehl’s forgotten legacy. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61(10), 1257-1276, doi: 10.1002/jclp.20181
Opublikowane
2019-04-05
Dział
Krótkie raporty