The Big Five and beyond: Personality traits and their measurement

Jan Cieciuch; Mariola Łaguna

Jan Cieciuch The University of Finance and Management in Warsaw
Mariola Łaguna The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Institute of Psychology

Keywords: personality traits; the Big Five; psychological measurement

Abstract

The article is an introduction to the volume devoted to personality traits and their measurement. It consists of two parts. The first part presents two research traditions that use the taxonomy of five personality traits: the lexical tradition (using the term “Big Five”) and the psychometric tradition (using the term “Five-Factor Model of Personality”). Similarities and differences between these traditions are outlined and the basic elements of other models that have appeared in recent studies – such as the Big Six or the Big Two – are introduced in it. The second part of the paper presents selected issues of measurement, discussed in detail in several texts included in the current issue of Annals of Psychology. Special attention is drawn to differences between various questionnaires in the operationalization of the five traits as well as to the growing popularity of short scales for measuring personality traits. The paper also outlines problems involved in the measurement of personality traits and the psychometric instruments used.

References

Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., Perugini, M., Szarota, P., De Vries, R. E., Di Blas, L., Boies, K., & De Raad, B. (2004). A six-factor structure of personality-descriptive adjectives: Solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(2), 356-366.
Angleitner, A., Ostendorf, F. i John, O. P. (1990). Towards a taxonomy of personality descriptors in German: A psycho-lexical study. Special Issue: Personality language. European Journal of Personality, 4, 89-118.
Block, J. (1995). A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description. Psychological Bulletin, 177, 187-215.
Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Borgogni, L. i Vecchione, M. (2007). BFQ-2. Big Five Questionnaire. Firenze: Organizzazioni Speciali.
Cattell, R. B. (1943). The description of personality: Basic traits resolved into clusters. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 38, 476-506.
Cieciuch, J. (2008). Przydatność falsyfikacjonizmu Karla Poppera w badaniach psychologicznych. W: R. Stachowski i W. Zeidler (red.), Opisowa metodologia badań psychologicznych. Studia i przykłady (s. 83-116). Warszawa: Vizja Press & IT.
Costa Jr., P. T. i McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Professional manual. Odessa, Fl: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Credé, M., Harms, P., Niehorster, S. i Gaye-Valentine, A. (2012). An evaluation of the consequences of using short measures of the Big Five personality traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 874-888.
De Raad, B. (1992). The replicability of the Big Five personality in three word-classes of the Dutch Language. European Journal of Personality, 6, 13-29.
De Raad, B., Barelds, D. P. H., Levert, E., Ostendorf, F., Mlacic, B., Di Blas, L., Hrebickova, M., Szirmak, Z., Szarota, P., Perugini, M., Church, A. T. i Katigbak, M. S. (2010). Only three tactors of personality description are fully replicable across languages: A comparison of 14 trait taxonomies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(1), 160-173.
De Raad, B. i M. Perugini (red.) (2002). Big Five assessment. Seattle–Toronto–Bern–Göttingen: Hogrefe and Huber Publishers.
DeYoung, C. G. (2006). Higher-order factors of the Big Five in a multiinformant sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1138-1151.
Digman, J. M. (1997). Higher-order factor of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1246-1256.
Fronczyk, K. (2014). Identyfikacja odpowiadania losowego lub nieuważnego w kwestionariuszu na przykładzie NEO-FFI. Roczniki Psychologiczne, 17(2), 439-456.
Goldberg, L. R. (1981). Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. W: L. Wheeler (red.), Review of personality and social psychology (t. 2, s. 141-165). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”. The Big Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216-1229.
Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A Broad-Bandwidth, Public-Domain, Personality Inventory Measuring the Lower-Level Facets of Several Five-Factor Models. W: I. Mervielde, I. Deary, F. De Fruyt i F. Ostendorf (red.), Personality psychology in Europe (t. 7, s. 7-28). Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.
Gorbaniuk, O., Szczepańska, N., Ivanova, A. i Zygnerska, M. (2014). Markery Wielkiej Szóstki polskiego leksykonu postrzeganych cech osobowości innych osób. Roczniki Psychologiczne, 17(2), 291-308.
Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J. i Swann Jr., W. B. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504-528.
John, O. P. i Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement,, and theoretical perspectives. W: L. A. Pervin i O. P. John (red.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (s. 102-138). New York: Guilford Press.
Łaguna, M., Bąk, W., Purc, E., Mielniczuk, E. i Oleś, P. K. (2014). Krótki Inwentarz Osobowości TIPI-P w badaniach polskich. Roczniki Psychologiczne, 17(2), 403-419.
McAdams, D. P. (1995). What do we know when we know a person? Journal of Personality, 63, 365-396.
McCrae, R. i Costa, P. (1999). A five-factor theory of personality. W: L. Pervin i O. John (red.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (s. 139-153). New York: Guilford Press.
Mischel, W. (2004). Toward an integrative science of the person. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 1-22.
Musek, J. (2007). A general factor of personality: Evidence of the Big One in the five-factor model. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 1213-1233.
Oleś, P. K. (2000). Kontrowersje wokół „Wielkiej Piątki”. Czasopismo Psychologiczne, 6, 7-18.
Oleś, P. (2009). Wprowadzenie do psychologii osobowości. Nowe wydanie. Warszawa: Scholar.
Popper, K. (1997). Mit schematu pojęciowego. Warszawa: Książka i Wiedza.
Rushton, J. P. i Irwing, P. (2008). A General Factor of Personality (GFP) from two metaanalyses of the Big Five: Digman (1997) and Mount, Barrick, Scullen, and Rounds (2005). Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 679-683.
Saucier, G., Thalmayer, A. G., Payne, D. L., Carlson, R., Sanogo, L., Ole-Kotikash, L., Church, A. T., Katigbak, M. S., Somer, O., Szarota, P., Szirmak, Z. i Zhou, H. (2014). A basic bivariate structure of personality attributes evident across nine languages. Journal of Personality, 82(1), 1-14.
Strelau, J. (2002). Psychologia różnic indywidualnych. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
Strus, W., Cieciuch, J. i Rowiński, T. (2014). Polska adaptacja kwestionariusza IPIP-BFM-50 do pomiaru pięciu cech osobowości w ujęciu leksykalnym. Roczniki Psychologiczne, 17(2), 327-346.
Strus, W. i Cieciuch, J. (w druku). Poza Wielką Piątkę – nowe modele opisu struktury osobowości.
Szarota, P. (2008). Wielka Piątka – stare problemy, nowe wątpliwości. Roczniki Psychologiczne, 11(1), 127-138.
Szarota, P., Ashton, M. i Lee, K. (2007). Taxonomy and structure of the Polish personality lexicon. European Journal of Personality, 21, 823-852.
Topolewska, E., Skimina, E., Strus, W., Cieciuch, J. i Rowiński, T. (2014). Krótki kwestionariusz do pomiaru Wielkiej Piątki IPIP-BFM-20, Roczniki Psychologiczne, 17(2), 367-384.
Zawadzki, B. i Strelau, J. (2014). O (nie)trafności ogólnego czynnika osobowości (GFP). Roczniki Psychologiczne, 17(2), 259-274.