Korupcja jako metafora

Dirk Tänzler

Dirk Tänzler Universität Bonn

Słowa kluczowe: korupcja; Rumunia; Niemcy; administracja; reformy

Abstrakt

The author of the article attempts to depict corruption as evaluation of social activity, and not as a structural relationship. His objective – as well as of the analysis of “corruption cultures” contained in the text – is not only to seek genetic reasons of the omnipresent phenomenon of “corruption”, which is explained normatively, but search in the social sense of corruptive practice in a specific historical situation. In the author’s opinion, research into corruption in Romania as an allegedly clearcasewill allow broader understanding of this phenomenon, e.g. also in Germany. Thus, if “traditional network relations” in Romania between political and economic elites block functional differentiation by applying liberal rhetoric to legitimisation, the liberal (administrative) reforms in Germany result in reversal of the differentiation and reduced reasonability of activity, which provides new fuel to development of networks and corruption instead of reducing them as originally intended. Therefore, corruption is an effect of structural conflict of objectives between activity of the administration and activity of entrepreneurs in the conditions of private economy, which creates the problem concerning the role and identity of state officials.

Bibliografia

DAHRENDORF R., Die Chancen der Krise. Uber die Zukunft des Liberalismus, Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlagsanstalt 1983.

FUKUYAMA F., Das Ende der Geschichte. Wo stehen wir?, München: Kindler 1992.

HUNTINGTON S. P., Political Order in Changing Societies, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press 1968.

LÉVI-STRAUSS C., Die elementaren Strukturen der Verwandtschaft, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp 1981.

LUHMANN N., Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp 1997.

MAEDER Ch., New Public Management in der Schweiz. Zur Dramaturgie und Pragmatik eines moralischen Kreuzzugs, w: Figurative Politik. Zur Performanz der Macht in der modernen Gesellschaft, red. H.-G. Soeffner, D. Tanzler, Opladen: Leske + Budrich 2002, s. 211-224.

MALINOWSKI B., Die Argonauten des westlichen Pazifik. Ein Bericht über Unternehmungen und Abenteuer der Eingeborenen in den Inselwelten von Melanesisch-Neuguinea, Frankfurt am Main: Syndikat 1984.

MARAVIC VON P., Public Management Reform und Korruption – Unbeabsichtigte Folgen. Verwaltungs-Archiv, „Zeitschrift für Verwaltungslehre, Verwaltungsrecht und Verwaltungspolitik”, 1/2006.

MARSCHAL M., The Changing Face of Post-Communist Corruption, „Democracy at Large” 1 (2004), http://www.democracyatlarge.org/vol1_no2/vol1_no2_FW_PC_Corruption.htm (dostęp: 28.06.07).

MAUSS M., Soziologie und Anthropologie, t. I, Berlin: Ullstein 1978.

MAUSS M., Die Gabe. Form und Funktion des Austauschs in archaischen Gesellschaften, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp 1990.

POWER M., The Audit Society. Rituals of Verification, Oxford: Oxford University Press 1997.

PRIDDAT B. P., Schwarze Locher der Verantwortung. Korruption – die negative Variante von Public-Private-Partnership, w: Korruption. Unaufgeklärter Kapitalismus – Multidisziplinare Perspektiven zu Funktion und Folgen der Korruption, red. S. A. Jansen, B. P. Priddat,Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag 2005, s. 85-101.

ROGOWSKI R., The Art of Mirrowing – Comparative Law and Social Theory, w: Challenges of European Legal Scholarship. Anglo-German Legal Essays, red. G. Wilson, R. Rogowski, Bristol: Blackstone Press Limited 1996, s. 215-232.

THURNWALD R., Die Gemeinde der Banaro, Stuttgart: Verlag von Ferdinand Enke 1921.

Transparency International, Corruption Perception Index (CPI) 2006, http://www.transparency.org/policy_research/surveys_indices/cpi/2006 (dostęp: 28.06.2007)