Problem oddziaływania Boga na świat w perspektywie procesualnej koncepcji aktualności
Abstrakt
The article exhibits the problem of God’s action in the world as it is presented in process philosophy. Whitehead conceived actuality as heterogenical category within which we can distinguish two modes: actuality of being and actuality of becoming. The second one is the actuality in primary sense; there is ontological primacy of becoming over being. Being is, according to J.L. Nobo’s interpretation, a product of becoming and not vice versa. Actuality of being depends on being-for-becoming. Actuality of becoming depends on prehending being into subjective immediacy of internal process of concrescence. Because of subjective character of becoming, an entity which is still becoming, cannot be prehended. It means that entity cannot play any role in becoming of other entities. Only entity whose process of concrescence has completed, entity which is in fact being, can play such a role. If God is a main exemplification of becoming, as primary actual, He is imprehensible. He cannot be objectified and His actuality is only actuality of subjective arrested immediacy. He cannot influence the world. Many process philosophers tried to solve the dillema. One of them is Lewis S. Ford whose proposal depends on introducing the third mode of actuality: the future creativity. But Ford does not consider basis of that temporal paradigm of actuality and doesn’t examine its justification. So what we need is a reconstruction of Whitehead’s philosophy which will let us check his ontological, epistemological and methodological presuppositions and asses whether the temporal paradigm is justified, whether the God-world problem really arises and whether it is possible to solve it in terms of process theory of actuality.
Bibliografia
A Key to Whitehead’s “Process and Reality”, ed. D.W. Sherburne, London 1966.
Allan G.: God as Future: On Not Taking Time Seriously, „Process Studies” 27 (1998), nr 1-2, s. 64-77.
Bracken J.A.: Prehending God in and through the World, „Process Studies” 29 (2000), nr 1, s. 4-15.
Canevi P.: Do We Need The ‘Actual Entities’, [w:] Whitehead und der Processbegriff, ed. H. Holz, E. Wolf-Gazo, Freiburg–München 1981, s. 185-187.
Eslick L.J.: Divine Causality, „The Modern Schoolman” 62 (1985), nr 5, s. 233-247.
Fetz R.L.: Aristotelian and Whiteheadian Conceptions of Actuality: I, transl. by J. W. Felt, „Process Studies” 19 (1990), nr 1, s. 15-27.
Ford L.S.: God as a Temporally-Ordered Society: Some Objections, „Tulane Studies in Philosophy” 34 (1986), s. 41-52.
Ford L.S.: Kirckpatrick on Subjective Becoming, „Process Studies” 4 (1974), nr 1, s. 37-41
Ford L.S.: On Epochal Becoming: Rosenthal on Whitehead, „Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society” 33 (1997), nr 4, s. 973-979.
Ford L.S.: Response to George Allan, „Process Studies” 27 (1998), nr 3-4, s. 338-341.
Ford L.S.: Creativity in a Future Key, [w:] New Essays in Metaphysics, ed. R.C. Neville, Albany 1987, s. 179-197.
Ford L.S.: God at Work, The Way God Is Effective in a Process Perpective, „Encounter” 57 (1996), nr 4, s. 327-340.
Ford L.S.: Is There a Distinct Superjective Nature?, „Process Studies” 4 (1974), nr 3, s. 228-229.
Ford L.S.: Locating Atomism, „Process Studies Supplement” 1-2 (1999), http://www.ctr4process.org/pss
Ford L.S.: On the Origins of Process Theism, „Process Studies” 32 (2003), nr 2, s. 270-297.
Ford L.S.: Subjectivity in the Making, „Process Studies” 21 (1992), nr 1, s. 1-25.
Ford L.S.: The Concept of ‘Process’: From ‘Transition’ to ‘Cocrescence’, [w:] Whitehead und der Processbegriff, ed. H. Holz, E. Wolf-Gazo, Freiburg–München 1981, s. 73-101.
Ford L.S.: The Divine Acitivity of the Future, „Process Studies” 11 (1981), nr 3, s. 169-179.
Ford L.S.: The Emergence of Whitehead’s Metaphysics 1925-1929, Albany 1984.
Ford L.S.: The Growth of Whitehead’s Theism, „Process Studies Supplement” 1-2 (1999), http://www. ctr4process.org/pss.
Ford L.S.: The Modes of Actuality, „The Modern Schoolman” 67 (1990), nr 4, s. 275-283.
Ford L.S.: Transforming Process Theism, New York 2000.
Ford L.S.: Whitehead’s Differences from Hartshorne, [w:] Two Process Philosophers: Hartshorne’s Encounter with Whitehead, ed. L.S. Ford, Tallahassee 1976, s. 58-83.
Gutowski P.: Filozofia procesu i jej metafilozofia, Lublin 1995.
Hartshorne Ch.: Whitehead’s Theory of Prehension, [w:] Whitehead’s Philosophy, Lincoln 1972, s. 125-127.
Hartshorne Ch.: Creative Synthesis and Philosophic Method, Lanham 1983.
Hartubise D.: The Enigmatic „Passage of the Consequent Nature to the Temporal World” in „Process and Reality”: An Alternative Interpretation, „Process Studies” 27 (1998), nr 1-2, s. 93-107.
James R.B.: Is Whitehead’s Actual Entity A Contradiction in Terms?, „Process Studies” 2 (1972), nr 2, s. 112-125.
Johnson A.H.: Some Conversations with Whitehead Concerning God and Creativity, [w:] Explorations in Whitehead’s Philosophy, ed. L.S. Ford, G.L. Kline, New York 1983, s. 3-13.
Kirckpatrick F.G., Subjective Becoming: Unwarranted Abstraction?, „Process Studies” 3 (1973), nr 1, s. 15-26.
Kline G.L.: Form, Concrescence, and Concretum, [w:] Explorations in Whitehead’s Philosophy, ed. L.S. Ford, G.L. Kline, New York 1983, s. 104-146.
Lango J., Whitehead’s Ontology, Albany 1972.
Lansing J.W.: The ‘Natures’ of Whitehead’s God, „Process Studies” 3 (1973), nr 3, s. 143-152.
Leclerc I.: Being and Becoming, [w:] Explorations in Whitehead’s Philosophy, ed. L.S. Ford, G.L. Kline, New York 1983, s. 53-67;
Leclerc I.: Whitehead’s Metaphysics, New Yersey 1978.
Nobo J.L.: Whitehead’s Principle of Process, „Process Studies” 4 (1974), nr 4, s. 275-284.
Sia S.: God in Process Thought, Dordrecht–Boston–Lancaster 1985.
Van der Veken J., Creativity as Universal Activity, [w:] Whitehead’s Metaphysics of Creativity, ed. Rapp and Wiehs, New York 1990, s. 178-188.
Wallack F.B.: The Epochal Nature of Process in Whitehead’s Metaphysics, Albany 1980.
Whitehead A.N.: Adventures of Ideas, New York 1951.
Whitehead A.N.: Modes of Thought, New York 1968.
Whitehead A.N.: Nauka i świat nowożytny, tłum. M. Kozłowski i M. Pieńkowski OP, Kraków 1987.
Whitehead A.N.: Process and Reality, New York–London 1978 (wyd. popr.).
Whitehead A.N.: Religia w tworzeniu, tłum. A. Szostkiewicz, Kraków 1997.
Copyright (c) 2005 Roczniki Filozoficzne
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
