All Shades of Passionfruit: Three Concepts of Universals and Truthmakers

Keywords: universals, concrete universals, truthmakers, monism, metaphysical grounding

Abstract

The aim of this article is to compare the three concepts of universals presented in “Tropes and Universals” by Pawel Rojek with theories of truthmaking. Rojek presents three approaches to the problem of unity in multiplicity: (1) specific unity which involves abstract properties, (2) general unity based on undefined aspects, and (3) concrete universals. Rojek proposes to interpret the first two in scope of truthmaking, by invoking the “passionfruit argument” and developing his own version of it. In my paper I follow Rojek's steps by developing his comparison to truthmakers to the concept of concrete universals. That development involves Schaffer’s priority monism and the concept of “the most promiscuous truthmaker”. Finally, I present my own version of the “passionfruit argument” that uses the notion of grounding.

Author Biography

Karol Kleczka, Jagiellonian University in Krakow, Poland

Karol Kleczka, MA — Jagiellonian University in Krakow, Faculty of Philosophy, Institute of Philosophy, Department of Ontology, PhD student

References

Armstrong, David Malet. 2004. Truth and Truth-makers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cheyne, Colin, & Charles Pigden. 2006. „Negative truths from positive facts”. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84, no. 2: 249–265. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00048400600759092.

Martin, Charles B. 1980. „Substance Substantiated”. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 58: 3–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00048408012341001.

Molnar, George. 2000. „Truthmakers for Negative Truths”. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 78 no. 1: 72–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00048400012349361

Mulligan, Kevin, Peter Simons & Barry Smith. 1984. „Truth-Makers”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 44: 287–321. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2107686.

O’Conaill, Donnchadh, & Tuomas Tahko. 2016. „Minimal Truthmakers”. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97, no. 2: 228–244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/papq.12064

Rodriguez-Pereyra, Gonzalo. 2006. „Truthmakers”. Philosophy Compass 1: 186–200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2006.00018.x.

Rojek, Paweł. 2019. Tropy i uniwersalia. Badania ontologiczne. Warszawa: Scholar.

Schaffer, Jonathan. 2010. „The Least Discerning and Most Promiscuous Truthmaker”. Philosophical Quarterly 69, 307–324. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9213.2009.612.x.

Wolniewicz, Bogusław. 1985. Ontologia sytuacji. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe [PWN].

Yablo, Stephen. 2014. Aboutness. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Published
2022-09-30
Section
Discussions