The Impossibility of Ultimate Moral Responsibility (trans. Jacek Jarocki)

  • Galen Strawson University of Texas w Austin, USA
Keywords: free will; moral responsibility; causa sui; determinism; indeterminism; Galen Strawson

Abstract

The problem of moral responsibility occupies a central place in the discussions concerning free will. It is generally held that it has far-reaching consequences for social life and law. However, as Galen Strawson argues, it is impossible to be morally responsible for one's own actions. The argument runs as follows: a person decides one way or another on the basis of his character, personality traits or other mental respects. However, one cannot be responsible for those features—it seems obvious that they are caused by factors one cannot be responsible for, such as one's upbringing or genes. Hence the only way to be morally responsible is to be causa sui, i.e. the cause of oneself. It is widely acknowledged though that nothing can be causa sui. It follows that moral responsibility is impossible.

References

Campbell, Charles Arthur. „Has the Self ‘Free Will’?”. W: tenże. On Selfhood and Godhood, 158–179. London: Allen & Unwin, 1957.

Carr, Edward H. Historia. Czym jest. Tłum. Piotr Kuś. Poznań: Zysk i S-ka, 1999.

Darcus, Shirley. „‘Daimon’ as a Force Shaping ‘Ethos’ in Heraclitus”. Phoenix 28 (1974), 4: 390–407.

Kane, Robert. „Two Kinds of Incompatibilism”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 50 (1989), 2: 219–54.

Kant, Immanuel. Krytyka praktycznego rozumu. Tłum. Jerzy Gałecki. Warszawa: PWN, 2005.

Kant, Immanuel. Opus postumum, red. Eckart Foster. Tłum. Eckart Foster i Michael Rosen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.

Kant, Immanuel. Religia w obrębie samego rozumu. Tłum. Aleksander Bobko. Kraków: Homini, 2007.

MacKay, Donald M. „On the Logical Indeterminacy of Free Choice”. Mind 69 (1960), 1: 31–40.

Mele, Alfred. Autonomous Agents: From Self-Control to Autonomy. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.

Mrówka, Kazimierz. Heraklit. Fragmenty: nowy przekład i komentarz. Warszawa: Scholar, 2004.

Nietzsche, Friedrich. Poza dobrem i złem. Preludium do filozofii przyszłości. Tłum. Grzegorz Sowiński. Kraków: Wydawnictwo UJ, 2012.

Patten, John w The Spectator, styczeń 1992.

Sartre, Jean-Paul. „Itinerary of a Thought”. New Left Review 58 (1969), 5–6: 43–66.

Sartre, Jean-Paul. Egzystencjalizm jest humanizmem. Tłum. Janusz Krajewski. Warszawa: Muza, 1998.

Schacht, Richard. Nietzsche. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1983.

Smilansky, Saul. „The Ethical Advantages of Hard Determinism”. Philosophical and Phenomenological Research 54 (1994), 2: 355–363.

Strawson, Galen. „The Impossibility of Moral Responsibility”. Philosophical Studies 75 (1994), 1–2: 5–24.

Strawson, Galen. Freedom and Belief, 28–30. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986.

Strawson, Galen. „Free Agents”. W: Galen Strawson. Real Materialism and Other Essays (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2008), 359–385.

Strawson, Galen. „The Impossibility of Ultimate Moral Responsibility”. W: tenże, Real Materialism and Other Essays, 319–31. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2008.

Van Inwagen, Peter. „When Is the Will Free?”. Philosophical Perspectives 3 (1989): 399–422.

Wiggins, David. „Towards a Reasonable Libertarianism”. W: Essays on Freedom of Action, red. Ted Honderich, 31–62. London: Routledge, 1975.

Published
2020-06-12
Section
Translations