I. Kant’s Apriorism Vs. Transcendental Method and its Understanding and Interpretation in the Marburg School’s Neo-Kantian Philosophy (II. Cohen, P. Natorp, R. Stammler)
Abstract
The author of the present study is particularly interested in the a priori epistemology “shown” by the German philosopher, which is the heart of the transcendental method both for Kant and for the Marburg philosophers. In the context of Stammler’s philosophy of law it is essential first of all from the point of view of the structure of the a priori concept of law that presents the fundamental issue for the study of his formal philosophy of law.
References
Gideon A., Der Begriff Transzendental in Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft, Marburg 1903.
Hartmann N., Systematische Methode, „Logos“ 1912, Bd. 3.
Knittermeyer H., Der terminus „transcendental“ in seiner historischen Entwicklung bis auf Kant, Marburg 1920.
Ożarowski J., Droga rozwojowa marburskiej doktryny etycznej, Warszawa 1998.
Trochimska-Kubacka M., Neokantyzm, Wrocław 1997.
Copyright (c) 2009 Roczniki Wydziału Nauk Prawnych i Ekonomicznych KUL
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
