Similarity to the interlocutor, certainty of standpoint, and integrative attitude in an internal dialogue

Małgorzata Puchalska-Wasyl

doi:10.18290/rpsych.2018.21.2-2

Małgorzata Puchalska-Wasyl The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Institute of Psychology

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18290/rpsych.2018.21.2-2

Keywords: internal/imagined dialogue; simulation of social relationships; integrative attitude; certainty of standpoint; similarity

Abstract

Numerous positive functions are ascribed to integrative internal dialogues. It is therefore worth looking for the determinants of dialogue author’s integrative attitude, which is understood as openness to the partner’s viewpoint as well as readiness to favorably consider their arguments and, consequently, to modify one’s own stance. The aim of the present experiment (N = 215) was to check how dialogue author’s integrative attitude is influenced by his or her similarity to the imagined interlocutor and by the author’s certainty of his or her standpoint. Before the participants conducted an imagined dialogue, they assessed the certainty of their standpoint and wrote down their three positive and three negative characteristics. Some of these characteristics were later presented to them as the traits of their potential interlocutor. Finally, the participants completed the Integration–Confrontation questionnaire, measuring their integrative attitude in the dialogue. I found that dialogue authors who were very certain of their own standpoints exhibited a significantly lower level of integrative attitude than those who were less certain of theirs. Additionally, it turned out that similarity in terms of negative characteristics increased integrative attitude in dialogue authors. No such relationship was observed when a sense of similarity in terms of positive characteristics was induced. This is a surprising result against the background of research on actual relationships, which may attest to the specificity of internal dialogues.

References

Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20-39.
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497-529.
Borawski, D. (2011). Wpływ aktywizowania myślenia dialogowego na sytuacyjną samoocenę i emocje [The influence of dialogical thinking activation on situational self-esteem and emotions]. In P. Oleś, M. Puchalska-Wasyl, & E. Brygoła (Eds.), Dialog z samym sobą [Dialogue with oneself] (pp. 201-223). Warsaw, Poland: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Byrne, D. (1962). Response to attitude similarity-dissimilarity as a function of affiliation need. Journal of Personality, 30, 164-177.
Byrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York, NY, US: Academic Press.
Byrne, D., & Nelson, D. (1965). Attraction as a linear function of proportion of positive reinforcements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1(6), 659-663.
Clore, G. L. (1976). Interpersonal interaction: An overview. In J. W. Thibaut, J. T. Spence, & R. T. Carson (Eds.), Contemporary topics in social psychology (pp. 135-175). Morristown, NJ, US: General Learning Press.
Crisp, R., & Turner, R. (2012). The imagined contact hypothesis. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 125-182.
Dutton, D. G., & Aron, A. P. (1974). Some evidence for heightened sexual attraction under conditions of high anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30(4), 510-517.
Ertel, S. (1986). Language, thought, and culture: Toward a mergence of diverging problem fields. In I. Kurcz, G. W. Shugar, & J. H. Danks (Eds.), Knowledge and language (pp. 139-163). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishers.
Fawcett, C. A., & Markson, L. (2010). Similarity predicts liking in 3-year-old children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 105(4), 345-358.
Goethals, G. R., & Nelson, R. E. (1973). Similarity in the influence process: The belief–value distinction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25(1), 117-122.
Hermans, H. J. M. (2003). The construction and reconstruction of a dialogical self. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 16, 89-130.
Hermans, H. J. M., & Gieser, T. (Eds.) (2012). Handbook of dialogical self theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Hermans, H. J. M., & Hermans-Konopka, A. (2010). Dialogical self theory: Positioning and counter-positioning in a globalizing society. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Johnson, J. J. (2010). Beyond a shadow of doubt: The psychological nature of dogmatism. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, 5(3), 149-161.
Kandel, D. B. (1978). Similarity in real-life adolescent friendship pairs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(3), 306-312.
Karylowski, J. (1976). Self-esteem, similarity, liking and helping. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2(1), 71-74.
Kramer, R. M., & Brewer, M. B. (1984). Effects of group identity on resource use in a simulated dilemma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1044-1057.
Lauderdale, P., Smith-Cunnien, P., Parker, J., & Inverarity, J. (1984). External threat and the definition of deviance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1058-1068.
Młynarczyk, M. (2011). Dialogi rozbieżnych Ja [Dialogues of discrepant selves]. In P. Oleś, M. Puchalska-Wasyl, & E. Brygoła (Eds.), Dialog z samym sobą [Dialogue with oneself] (pp. 224-251). Warsaw, Poland: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Pelham, B. W., Carvallo, M., & Jones, J. T. (2005). Implicit egotism. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(2), 106-110.
Puchalska-Wasyl, M. (2016a). Coalition and opposition in myself? On integrative and confrontational internal dialogues, their functions, and the types of inner interlocutors. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 29(2), 197-218. DOI: 10.1080/10720537.2015.1084601
Puchalska-Wasyl, M. (2016b). Determinants of integration and confrontation in internal dialogues. Japanese Psychological Research, 58(3), 248-260. DOI: 10.1111/jpr.12115
Puchalska-Wasyl, M. (2016c). Integracja i konfrontacja w dialogu wewnętrznym – analiza języka [Integration and confrontation in internal dialogue – linguistic analysis]. Przegląd Psychologiczny, 59(1), 57-73.
Puchalska-Wasyl, M. (2017). Relationship of personality with integration and confrontation in internal dialogues. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 58, 451-457. DOI: 10.1111/sjop.12387
Rokeach, M. (1960). Open and closed mind: Investigations into the nature of belief systems and personality systems. New York, NY, US: Basic Books.
Schachter, S. (1959). Psychology of affiliation. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Sprecher, S. (2014). Effects of actual (manipulated) and perceived similarity on liking in get-acquainted interactions: The role of communication. Communication Monographs, 81(1), 4-27.
Staub, E. (2014). Obeying, joining, following, resisting, and other processes in the Milgram studies, and in the Holocaust and other genocides: Situations, personality, and bystanders. Journal of Social Issues, 70(3), 501-514.
Staudinger, U. M., & Baltes, P. B. (1996). Interactive minds: A facilitative setting for wisdom-related performance? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(4), 746-762.
Stein, A. A. (1976). Conflict and cohesion: A review of the literature. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 20, 143-172.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago, IL, US: Nelson-Hall Publishers.
Ten Eyck, L. L., Labansat, H. A., Gresky, D. M., Dansereau, D. F., & Lord, C. G. (2006). Effects of directed thinking on intentions to engage in beneficial activities: Idea generation or mental simulation? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 1234-1262.
Wilson, K. S., DeRue, D. S., Matta, F. K., Howe, M., & Conlon, D. E. (2016). Personality similarity in negotiations: Testing the dyadic effects of similarity in interpersonal traits and the use of emotional displays on negotiation outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(10), 1405-1421.
Zinczuk-Zielazna, J., & Obrębska, M. (2016). Styles of coping and the level of dogmatism in utterance texts as an indicator of anxiety in situations of social exposure. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 47(4), 402-411.