The influence of object complexity and rotation angle on eye movements during mental rotation

  • Bibianna Bałaj The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Institute of Psychology
Keywords: mental rotation; eye movements; comparing eye scanpaths

Abstract

The scientific objective of the study was to identify factors modifying the eye movements observed during the performance of mental rotation tasks. On the one hand, differences were sought in indicators concerning eye movements between the phases of the perception of an object in the original and rotated positions; on the other hand, the study tested the influence of object complexity on the strength of similarity between perception and visualization in terms of the times of eye fixation in corresponding regions of interest. The results showed longer mean fixation times as well as a lower number and frequency of eye fixations when visualizing objects compared to viewing them. It can therefore be concluded that mental images required longer and deeper data processing than viewed objects did. The similarity of perception and visualization in terms of visual fixation times in corresponding regions of interest was stronger for simple objects than for complex ones. Moreover, it was demonstrated that for larger rotation angles the number of fixations was higher and their frequency was lower compared to smaller angles, which suggests an increase in perceived task difficulty and an increase in cognitive engagement with the increase in rotation angle.

References

Alexander, G. M. i Evardone, M. (2008). Blocks and bodies: Sex differences in a novel version of the Mental Rotations Test. Hormones and Behavior, 53(1), 177-184.
Bałaj, B. i Francuz, P. (2012). Siła podobieństwa w ruchach oczu wykonywanych podczas oglądania i wyobrażania sobie obiektów – czynniki modyfikujące. Polski Przegląd Medycyny i Psychologii Lotniczej, 2(18), 63-76.
Bethell-Fox, C. E. i Shepard, R. N. (1988). Mental rotation: Effects of stimulus complexity and familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14(1), 12-23.
Brandt, S. A. i Stark, L. W. (1997). Spontaneous eye movements during visual imagery reflect the content of the visual scene. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9(1), 27-38.
Burton, L. A., Henninger, D. i Hafetz, J. (2005). Gender differences in relations of mental rotation, verbal fluency, and SAT scores to finger length ratios as hormonal indexes. Developmental Neuropsychology, 28(1), 493-505.
Carpenter, P. A. i Just, M. A. (1978). Eye fixations during mental rotation. W: J. W. Senders, D. F. Fisher i R. A. Monty (red.), Eye movements and the higher psychological functions (s. 115-133). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Chlewiński, Z. (1997). Podstawowe problemy teoretyczno-metodologiczne w badaniach nad wyobraźnią. Kolokwia Psychologiczne, 6, 27-57.
Cooper, L. A. (1975). Mental rotation of random two-dimensional shapes. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 20-43.
Cooper, L. A. i Podgorny, P. (1976). Mental transformations and visual comparison processes: Effects of complexity and similarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 503-514.
Corballis, M. C. i McLaren, R. (1982). Interaction between perceived and imagined rotation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8(2), 215-224.
De’Sperati, C. (2003). Precise oculomotor correlates of visuospatial mental rotation and circular motion imagery. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15(8), 1244-1259.
Duchowski, A. T. (2007). Eye tracking methodology: Theory and practice (wyd. 2). Londyn: Springer-Verlag.
Ehrlich, S. B., Levine, S. C. i Goldin-Meadow, S. (2006). The importance of gesture in children’s spatial reasoning. Developmental Psychology, 42(6), 1259-1268.
Folk, M. D. i Luce, R. D. (1987). Effects of stimulus complexity on mental rotation rate of polygons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13(3), 395-404.
Intons-Peterson, M. J. (1983). Imagery paradigms: How vulnerable are they to experimenters’ expectations? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9(3), 394-412.
Just, M. A. i Carpenter, P. A. (1976). Eye fixations and cognitive processes. Cognitive Psychology, 8(4), 441-480.
Laeng, B. i Teodorescu, D. S. (2002). Eye scanpaths during visual imagery reenact those of perception of the same visual scene. Cognitive Science, 26(2), 207-231.
Mariwa, H. P., Xu, Y. i Pomplun, M. (w druku). Piecewise mental rotation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.
Nakatani, C. i Pollatsek, A. (2004). An eye movement analysis of “mental rotation” of simple scenes. Perception and Psychophysics, 66(7), 1227-1245.
Orne, M. T. (1962). On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. American Psychologist, 17(11), 776-783.
Rafi, A. i Samsudin, K. (2009). Practising mental rotation using interactive Desktop Mental Rotation Trainer (iDeMRT). British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(5), 889-900.
Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372-422.
Shepard, R. N. i Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional object. Science, 171, 701-703.
Spivey, M. J. i Geng, J. J. (2001). Oculomotor mechanisms activated by imagery and memory: Eye movements to absent objects. Psychological Research, 65(4), 235-241.
Zangemeister, W. H. i Liman, T. (2007). Foveal versus parafoveal scanpaths of visual imagery in virtual hemianopic subjects. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 37(7), 975-982.
Published
2019-04-05
Section
Articles