Polska adaptacja kwestionariusza IPIP-BFM-50 do pomiaru pięciu cech osobowości w ujęciu leksykalnym
Abstract
Artykuł prezentuje polską adaptację kwestionariusza IPIP-BFM-50 Goldberga do pomiaru pięciu cech osobowości w tradycji leksykalnej (ekstrawersja, ugodowość, sumienność, stabilność emocjonalna oraz intelekt). Procedura adaptacyjna została przeprowadzona w ośmiu badaniach, natomiast analizy - łącznie na grupie N = 7015 osób w wieku od 10 do 83 lat (średnia wieku wyniosła 29 lat). Rzetelność oszacowano za pomocą wskaźników α Cronbacha. Trafność czynnikowa została zweryfikowana w konfirmacyjnej analizie czynnikowej, zaś równoważność pomiaru między różnymi sytuacjami badawczymi - w wielogrupowej konfirmacyjnej analizie czynnikowej. Trafność zewnętrzna została oszacowana poprzez porównanie wyników uzyskanych za podstawie IPIP-BFM-50 z wynikami NEO-FFI i NEO-PI-R. Otrzymane wyniki uzasadniają wniosek, że IPIP-BFM-50 jest narzędziem o satysfakcjonujących parametrach psychometrycznych, które może być stosowane w badaniach naukowych.
References
Ashton, M. C. i Lee, K. (2005). Honesty-Humility, the Big Five, and the Five-Factor Model. Journal of Personality, 73(5), 1321-1353.
Biderman, M. D., Nguyen, N. T., Cunningham, C. J. i Ghorbani, N. (2011). The ubiquity of common method variance: The case of the Big Five. Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 417-429.
Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Press.
Chen, F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(3), 464-504.
Costa, P. T. i McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO–PI–R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Cieciuch, J. i Davidov, E. (2014). Establishing measurement invariance across online and offline samples. A tutorial with the software packages Amos and Mplus. Studia Psychologica.
De Raad, B. i Perugini, M. (red.) (2002). Big Five assessment. Seattle–Toronto–Bern–Göttingen: Hogrefe and Huber Publishers.
De Raad, B., Perugini, M., Hrebickova, M. i Szarota, P. (1998). Lingua franca of personality: Taxonomies and structures based on the psycholexical approach. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 212-232.
Donnellan, M. B., Oswald, F. L., Baird, B. M. i Lucas, R. E. (2006). The Mini-IPIP Scales: Tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five Factors of personality. Psychological Assessment, 18(2), 192-203.
Goldberg, L. R. (1981). Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. W: L. Wheeler (red.), Review of personality and social psychology (t. 2, s. 141-165). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”. The Big Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216-1229.
Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers of Big Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 26-42.
Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public-domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several Five-Factor Models. W: I. Mervielde, I. Deary, F. De Fruyt i F. Ostendorf (red.), Personality psychology in Europe (t. 7, s. 7-28). Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.
Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., Eber, H. W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M. C., Cloninger, C. R. i Gough, H. G. (2006). The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 84-96.
Gorbaniuk, O., Budzińska, A., Owczarek, M., Bożek, E. i Juros, K. (2013). The factor structure of Polish personality-descriptive adjectives: An alternative psycho-lexical study. European Journal of Personality, 27(3), 304-318.
Guenole, N. i Chernyshenko, O. S. (2005). The suitability of Goldberg’s Big Five IPIP personality markers in New Zealand: A dimensionality, bias, and criterion validity evaluation. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 34, 86-96.
Hendriks, A. A. J., Hofstee, W. K. B. i de Raad, B. (1999). The Five-Factor Personality Inventory (FFPI). Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 307-325.
Hofstee, W. K. B., de Raad, B. i Goldberg, L. R. (1992). Integration of the Big Five and circumplex approaches to trait structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(1), 146-163.
Hu, L. i Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cut – off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55.
Jarmuż, S. (1994). Metodologiczne problemy związane z weryfikacją modelu „Wielkiej Piątki”. Przegląd Psychologiczny, 37(1-2), 195-203.
John, O. P. i Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. W: L. A. Pervin, O. P. John (red.), Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research (s. 102-138). New York: Guilford Press.
Little, T., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., i Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 151-173.
Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T. i Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cut-off values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11(3), 320-341.
McCrae, R. R. i Costa, P. T. (2005). Osobowość człowieka dorosłego. Kraków: Wydawnictwo WAM.
McCrae, R. R. i John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the Five-Factor Model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 175-215.
Saucier, G. (1994). Mini-markers: A brief version of Goldberg’s unipolar Big-Five markers. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63, 506-516.
Saucier, G. i Goldberg, L. R. (2002). Assessing the big five: Applications of 10 psychometric criteria to the development of marker scales. W: B. de Raad i M. Perugini (red.), Big Five assessment (s. 30-54). Ashland, OH: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.
Siuta, J. (2006). Inwentarz Osobowości NEO-PI-R Paula T. Costy Jr i Roberta R. McCrae. Adaptacja polska. Podręcznik. Warszawa: PTP.
Siuta, J. (red.) (2009). Diagnoza osobowości. Inwentarz NEO-PI-R w teorii i praktyce. Warszawa: PTP.
Strus, W. i Cieciuch, J. (2014). Poza Wielką Piatkę – nowe modele struktury osobowości. Polskie Forum Psychologiczne (w druku).
Strus, W., Cieciuch, J., Davidov, E., Vecchione, M., Rowiński, T., Gasiul, H., Stillwell i D., Kosiński, M. (2013). Factorial structure of personality as measured by the IPIP-100 in 33 countries. Referat wygłoszony na 12th European Conference on Psychological Assessment, San Sebastian, Hiszpania.
Strus, W., Cieciuch, J. i Rowiński, T. (2014). Circumplex structure of personality traits measured by the IPIP-45AB5C questionnaire in Poland. Personality and Individual Differences, 71, 77-82.
Szarota, P. (1995). Polska Lista Przymiotnikowa (PLP): narzędzie do diagnozy pięciu wielkich czynników osobowości. Studia Psychologiczne, 33, 227-255.
Vandenberg, R. J. i Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4-70.
Zawadzki, B., Strelau, J., Szczepaniak, P. i Śliwińska, M. (1998). Inwentarz Osobowości NEO-FFI Costy i McCrae. Adaptacja polska. Podręcznik. Warszawa: PTP.
Zheng, L., Goldberg, L. R., Zheng, Y., Zhao, Y., Tang, Y. i Liu, L. (2008). Reliability and concurrent validation of the IPIP Big-Five factor markers in China: Consistencies in factor structure between Internet-obtained heterosexual and homosexual samples. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 649-654.
Biderman, M. D., Nguyen, N. T., Cunningham, C. J. i Ghorbani, N. (2011). The ubiquity of common method variance: The case of the Big Five. Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 417-429.
Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Press.
Chen, F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(3), 464-504.
Costa, P. T. i McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO–PI–R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Cieciuch, J. i Davidov, E. (2014). Establishing measurement invariance across online and offline samples. A tutorial with the software packages Amos and Mplus. Studia Psychologica.
De Raad, B. i Perugini, M. (red.) (2002). Big Five assessment. Seattle–Toronto–Bern–Göttingen: Hogrefe and Huber Publishers.
De Raad, B., Perugini, M., Hrebickova, M. i Szarota, P. (1998). Lingua franca of personality: Taxonomies and structures based on the psycholexical approach. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 212-232.
Donnellan, M. B., Oswald, F. L., Baird, B. M. i Lucas, R. E. (2006). The Mini-IPIP Scales: Tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five Factors of personality. Psychological Assessment, 18(2), 192-203.
Goldberg, L. R. (1981). Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. W: L. Wheeler (red.), Review of personality and social psychology (t. 2, s. 141-165). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”. The Big Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216-1229.
Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers of Big Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 26-42.
Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public-domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several Five-Factor Models. W: I. Mervielde, I. Deary, F. De Fruyt i F. Ostendorf (red.), Personality psychology in Europe (t. 7, s. 7-28). Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.
Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., Eber, H. W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M. C., Cloninger, C. R. i Gough, H. G. (2006). The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 84-96.
Gorbaniuk, O., Budzińska, A., Owczarek, M., Bożek, E. i Juros, K. (2013). The factor structure of Polish personality-descriptive adjectives: An alternative psycho-lexical study. European Journal of Personality, 27(3), 304-318.
Guenole, N. i Chernyshenko, O. S. (2005). The suitability of Goldberg’s Big Five IPIP personality markers in New Zealand: A dimensionality, bias, and criterion validity evaluation. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 34, 86-96.
Hendriks, A. A. J., Hofstee, W. K. B. i de Raad, B. (1999). The Five-Factor Personality Inventory (FFPI). Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 307-325.
Hofstee, W. K. B., de Raad, B. i Goldberg, L. R. (1992). Integration of the Big Five and circumplex approaches to trait structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(1), 146-163.
Hu, L. i Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cut – off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55.
Jarmuż, S. (1994). Metodologiczne problemy związane z weryfikacją modelu „Wielkiej Piątki”. Przegląd Psychologiczny, 37(1-2), 195-203.
John, O. P. i Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. W: L. A. Pervin, O. P. John (red.), Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research (s. 102-138). New York: Guilford Press.
Little, T., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., i Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 151-173.
Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T. i Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cut-off values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11(3), 320-341.
McCrae, R. R. i Costa, P. T. (2005). Osobowość człowieka dorosłego. Kraków: Wydawnictwo WAM.
McCrae, R. R. i John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the Five-Factor Model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 175-215.
Saucier, G. (1994). Mini-markers: A brief version of Goldberg’s unipolar Big-Five markers. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63, 506-516.
Saucier, G. i Goldberg, L. R. (2002). Assessing the big five: Applications of 10 psychometric criteria to the development of marker scales. W: B. de Raad i M. Perugini (red.), Big Five assessment (s. 30-54). Ashland, OH: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.
Siuta, J. (2006). Inwentarz Osobowości NEO-PI-R Paula T. Costy Jr i Roberta R. McCrae. Adaptacja polska. Podręcznik. Warszawa: PTP.
Siuta, J. (red.) (2009). Diagnoza osobowości. Inwentarz NEO-PI-R w teorii i praktyce. Warszawa: PTP.
Strus, W. i Cieciuch, J. (2014). Poza Wielką Piatkę – nowe modele struktury osobowości. Polskie Forum Psychologiczne (w druku).
Strus, W., Cieciuch, J., Davidov, E., Vecchione, M., Rowiński, T., Gasiul, H., Stillwell i D., Kosiński, M. (2013). Factorial structure of personality as measured by the IPIP-100 in 33 countries. Referat wygłoszony na 12th European Conference on Psychological Assessment, San Sebastian, Hiszpania.
Strus, W., Cieciuch, J. i Rowiński, T. (2014). Circumplex structure of personality traits measured by the IPIP-45AB5C questionnaire in Poland. Personality and Individual Differences, 71, 77-82.
Szarota, P. (1995). Polska Lista Przymiotnikowa (PLP): narzędzie do diagnozy pięciu wielkich czynników osobowości. Studia Psychologiczne, 33, 227-255.
Vandenberg, R. J. i Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4-70.
Zawadzki, B., Strelau, J., Szczepaniak, P. i Śliwińska, M. (1998). Inwentarz Osobowości NEO-FFI Costy i McCrae. Adaptacja polska. Podręcznik. Warszawa: PTP.
Zheng, L., Goldberg, L. R., Zheng, Y., Zhao, Y., Tang, Y. i Liu, L. (2008). Reliability and concurrent validation of the IPIP Big-Five factor markers in China: Consistencies in factor structure between Internet-obtained heterosexual and homosexual samples. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 649-654.
Published
2019-04-04
Issue
Section
Articles
Copyright (c) 2014 Roczniki Psychologiczne
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
