The impact of retinal size on mental transformations in imagery: Rotation, synthesis, combination

Ewelina Pękalska

Ewelina Pękalska Faculty Of Pedagogy And Psychology, University Of Economics And Innovation in Lublin

Keywords: imagination; mental rotation; mental synthesis; simultaneous operations; retinal size; object size vs. mental operations

Abstract

The following paper is an answer to a research question regarding the impact of retinal size (understood as the tangent of the object’s physical size and its distance from the subject) on mental transformations. A total of 182 people took part in three designed experiments, which included three types of operations: 1) synthesis as an operation changing the structure of the object; 2) rotation as an operation preserving the structure of the object; and 3) a combination of the two. The impact of retinal size on the course of rotation was confirmed. Furthermore, it turned out that this impact significantly influenced the effectiveness of all three mental operations. A tendency regarding the impact of physical size on synthesis was demonstrated (participants performed mental transformations in the most optimal way on 15 cm (5.9 in) objects – such that can be held in a hand in the real world). It was noticeable that the optimal distance to the object, preferred by participants, was 30 cm (11.8 in). In the real world, such a distance enables them to transform objects freely within arm’s reach. The obtained results support the analogousness of the mental world to the world in which we live.

References

Biedermann, I. (1987). Recognition by components. A theory of human imagery understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115-147.
Bundesen, C., & Larsen, A. (1975). Visual transformation of size. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 3, 214-220.
Cooper, L. A., & Shepard, R. N. (1973). Chronometric studies of the rotation of mental images. In W. Chase (Ed.), Visual information processing (pp. 175-176). New York: Academic Press.
Cooper, L. (1975). Mental rotation of random two-dimensional shapes. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 20-43.
Falconer, C., & Mast, F. W. (2012). Balancing the mind: Vestibular induced facilitation of egocentric mental transformations. Experimental Psychology, 59(6), 332-339.
Finke, R. A. (1990). Creative imagery: Discoveries and inventions in visualization. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Finke, R., A. (1985). Theories relating mental imagery to perception. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 236-259.
Francuz, P. (2007). Teoria wyobraźni Stephana Kosslyna. Próba reinterpretacji. In P. Francuz (Ed.), Obrazy w umyśle (pp. 149-185). Warsaw: Scholar.
Francuz, P. Oleś, M., & Chumak, M. (2008). Umysłowa rotacja obiektów semantycznych i asemantycznych umieszczonych w naturalnym kontekście. Przegląd Psychologiczny, 51(2), 235-260.
Glover, S., & Dixon, P. (2013). Context and vision effects on real and imagined actions: Support for the common representation hypothesis of motor imagery. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, doi: 10.1037/a0031276.
Glushko R. J., & Cooper, L. A. (1978). Spatial comprehension and comparison processes in verification tasks. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 391-421.
Hadamard, J. (1964). Psychologia odkryć matematycznych. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Janczyk, M., Pfister, R., Crognale, M., & Kunde, W. (2012). Effective rotations: Action effects determine the interplay of mental and manual rotations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 141(3), 489-501.
Janowski, J. (2007). Przedstawienia wyobrażonej przestrzeni na obrazach. In P. Francuz (Ed.), Obrazy w umyśle (pp. 63-109). Warsaw: Scholar.
Kosslyn S. M. (1980). Image and mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kosslyn, S., & Rosenberg, R. (2006). Mózg – człowiek – świat. Cracow: Wydawnictwo Znak.
Kosslyn, S. M. (1995). Mental imagery. In S. M. Kosslyn, & D. N Osherson (Eds.), Visual cognition, 2nd edition (pp. 267-297). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kosslyn, S. M. (2005). Mental images and the brain. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22(3/4), 333-347.
Króliczak, G 2005.). Czy iluzje zwodzą jedynie „oko”, ale już nie rękę? Retrieved from http://www.kognitywistyka.net
Króliczak G., Heard, P., Goodale, M., & Gregory, L. (2006). Dissociation of perception and action unmasked by the follow-face illusion. Brain Research, 1080, 9-16.
Króliczak, G. (1999). Dwa mózgi wzrokowe: percepcja a wzrokowa kontrola działania. Kogniwistyka i Media w Edukacji, 2, 199-224.
Kubovy, M., & Podgorny, P. (1981) Does pattern matching require the normalization of size and orientation? Perception & Psychophysics, 30, 24-28.
Lawson, R. (2009). A comparison of the effects of depths rotation on visual and haptic three-dimensional object recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 911-930.
Lubart, T. I., & Sternberg R. J. (1995). An investment approach to creativity: Theory and data. In S. M. Smith, T. B. Ward, & R. A. Finke (Eds.), The creative cognition approach (pp. 269-302). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Maruszewski, T. (1992). Model zależności umysł-zadanie w procesach twórczych. In Cz. Nosal, (Ed.), Twórcze przetwarzanie informacji (pp. 26-42). Wrocław: DELTA.
Milner, A. D., & Goodale, M. A. (1995). The visual brain in action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Milner, A. D., & Goodale, M. A. (2006). One brain – two visual systems. The Psychologist, 19(11), 360-363.
Mostowski, A. (1974) Elementy algebry wyższej. 7th edition. Warsaw: PWN.
Nakata, Y., & Suzuki, K. (1988). Does the size of figures affect the rate of mental rotation? Perception & Psychophys, 44(1), 76-80.
Nęcka, E. (2001). Psychologia twórczości. Gdańsk: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.
Nęcka. E., & Sowa, J. (2005). Człowiek – umysł – maszyna. Rozmowy o twórczości i inteligencji. Cracow: Znak.
Nowak, A. (1986). Wyobrażeniowe przetwarzanie informacji. Przegląd badań i teorii. Przegląd Psychologiczny, 29(3), 673-703.
Nowak, A. (1991). Wyobrażeniowe mechanizmy przetwarzania informacji: Myślenie przestrzenne. Wrocław: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich, Wydawnictwo PAN.
Paivio, A. (1978). The relationship between verbal an perceptual codes. In E. C Carette, & M. P Fiedman (Eds.), Handbook of perception. Perceptual coding (Chapter 8). New York: Academic Press.
Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1979). The rate of mental rotation of images: A test of a holistic analogue hypothesis. Memory and Cognition, 7, 19-28.
Reber, A. (2002). Słownik psychologii. Warsaw: Scholar.
Sadoski, M., & Paivio, A. (2001). Imagery and text. A dual coding theory of reading and writing. New Jersey, London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotations of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701-703.
Sheperd, R. N., & Cooper, L. A. (1982). Mental images and their transformations. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Sternberg, R. J. (2001). Psychologia poznawcza. Warsaw: Wydawnictwa Szkolne i Pedagogiczne.
Stone, J. V. (1999). Object recognition: View-specificity and motion-specificity. Vision Research, 39, 4032-4044.
Suzuki, K., & Nakata, Y. (1988). Does the size of figures affect the rate of mental rotation? Perception & Psychophysics, 44(1), 76-80.
Taosheng, L., & Cooper, L. A. (2003). Explicit and implicit memory for rotating objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology / Learning, Memory & Cognition, 29(4), 554-562.
Tomaszewski, T. (1992). Psychologia ogólna. Warsaw: PWN.
Tużnik, P., & Francuz, P. (2012). Wpływ złożoności i wymiarowości obiektów na efektywność wykonania rotacji umysłowej. Polski Przegląd Medycyny i Psychologii Lotniczej, 2(18), 87-108.