Nauka czy performance? Refleksja nad znaczeniem współczesnych badań jakościowych
References
Abstracts of papers presented at the 7th Advances in Qualitative Methods International Conference. Surfers Paradise, Queensland, Australia. 13-16 July 2006. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5 (3); http://www.ualberta.ca/~ijqm Anderson, J. (2006). Well-suited partners: Psychoanalytic research and grounded theory. Journal of Child Psychotherapy, 32, 3, 329-348.
Bagley, C. (2006). (Re)Telling the Qualitative Tale: Opportunities and challenges in the use of multi-media performance in the analysis and presentation of ethnographic research data. Abstracts of papers. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5, 3, 7.
Bagley, C. (2008). Exploring multimedia performance in educational research. W: Th. Hansson (red.), Handbook of research on digital international technologies: Innovations, method, and ethical issues (s. 14-26). New York: Hershey (IGI Global).
Buergelt, P. T., Morgan, M., Henderson, A., Julian, R., Cramer, M. (2006). Realising the potential of bricolage design: Consistency among the assumptions of the research components is crucial. Abstracts of papers. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5, 3, 9.
Caelli, K., Ray, L., Mill, J. (2003). ‘Clear as mud’: Toward greater clarity in generic qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2, 2, 1-20.
Carspecken, P. F. (2006). What lies beyond the narrative horizon? The spiritual dimension in critical qualitative research. Abstract of papers. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5,3, 1.
Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. W: N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln (red.), Handbook of qualitative research (s. 509-535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Colucci, E. (2006). “Focus group can be fun”: Use of activity-oriented questions. Abstracts of papers. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5, 3, 12.
Cox, C., Roine, K., Coutts, A. (2006). Looking to the future: Information upon which to plan future service initiatives that address the “human costs” of breast cancer amongst black minority non- English speaking women. Abstracts of papers. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5, 3, 14.
Delport, C. S. L., Motepe, M. M. (2006). Exploring the socio-emotional needs and problems of and life skills needed by early adolescent AIDS orphans: A qualitative study. Abstracts of papers. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5, 3, 17.
Denzin, N. K. (1989). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Eaves, Y. D. (2001). A synthesis technique for grounded theory data analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 35, 5, 654-663.
Giddens, A. (2006). Nowoczesność i tożsamość. „Ja” i społeczeństwo w epoce późnej nowoczesności. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Glaser, B. G (1978). Theoretical sensivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valey, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G (2002). Constructivist grounded theory? Qualitative Social Research, 3, 3, art. 12; http://www.qualitative-research.net/lqs/
Glaser, B. G. (2009). Jargonizing: The use of the grounded theory vocabulary. The Grounded Theory Review, 8, 1; http://www.groundedtheory.com/booksjournals.aspx
Glaser, B. G, Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine (wyd. polskie: Odkrywanie teorii ugruntowanej. Strategie badania jakościowego. Warszawa: Nomos 2009).
Greckhamer, T., Koro-Ljunberg, M. (2005). The erosion of a method: Examples from grounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 18, 6, 729-750.
Jost, W., Hyde, M. J. (red.) (1997). Rhetoric and hermeneutic in our time. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Furman, R., Letz, C., Langer, C. L. (2006). The research poem in international social work: Innovations in qualitative methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5, 3, 1-8.
Kelle, U. (2006). Combining qualitative and quantitative methods in research practice: Purposes and advantages. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 293-311.
Kulazińska, A. (2009). Sztuka vs. życie. Rozmowa z Mireią Sallares; www.obieg.pl (3.06).
Mills, J., Bonner, A., Francis, K. (2006). The development of constructivist grounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5, 1, 1-10.
McAdams, D., West, S. G (1997). Introduction: Personality psychology and the case study. Journal of Personality, 65, 4, 756-785.
Porter, S. (2007). Validity, trusthworthiness and rigour: Reasserting realism in qualitative research.
Journal of Advanced Nursing, 60, 1, 79-86.
Ritchie, L. (2006). The spaces in-between: Narratives surrounding quantitative data collection.
Abstracts of papers. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5, 3, 69.
Robles-Silva, L. (2006). Doing fieldwork with old people: Methodological challenges. Abstracts of papers. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5, 3, 69.
Rolfe, G (2006). Validity, trustwhorthiness and rigour: Quality and the idea of qualitative research.
Journal of Advanced Nursing, 53, 3, 304-310.
Sandelowski, M. (2000). Combining qualitative and quantitative sampling, data collection and analysis techniques in mixed-method studies. Research in Nursing & Health, 23, 3, 246-255. Sallares, M. (2009). To have & to lose [Mieć i stracić]. Wystawa w Gdańskim Centrum Sztuki Współczesnej Łaźnia, czerwiec.
Stern, P. A. (1994). Eroding grounded theory. W: J. Morse (red.), Critical issues in qualitative research methods. Thousand Oaks, Ca: Sage Publications.
Wilson, H. S., Hutchinson, S. A. (1996). Methodological mistakes in grounded theory. Nursing Research, 45, 122-124.
Bagley, C. (2006). (Re)Telling the Qualitative Tale: Opportunities and challenges in the use of multi-media performance in the analysis and presentation of ethnographic research data. Abstracts of papers. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5, 3, 7.
Bagley, C. (2008). Exploring multimedia performance in educational research. W: Th. Hansson (red.), Handbook of research on digital international technologies: Innovations, method, and ethical issues (s. 14-26). New York: Hershey (IGI Global).
Buergelt, P. T., Morgan, M., Henderson, A., Julian, R., Cramer, M. (2006). Realising the potential of bricolage design: Consistency among the assumptions of the research components is crucial. Abstracts of papers. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5, 3, 9.
Caelli, K., Ray, L., Mill, J. (2003). ‘Clear as mud’: Toward greater clarity in generic qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2, 2, 1-20.
Carspecken, P. F. (2006). What lies beyond the narrative horizon? The spiritual dimension in critical qualitative research. Abstract of papers. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5,3, 1.
Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. W: N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln (red.), Handbook of qualitative research (s. 509-535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Colucci, E. (2006). “Focus group can be fun”: Use of activity-oriented questions. Abstracts of papers. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5, 3, 12.
Cox, C., Roine, K., Coutts, A. (2006). Looking to the future: Information upon which to plan future service initiatives that address the “human costs” of breast cancer amongst black minority non- English speaking women. Abstracts of papers. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5, 3, 14.
Delport, C. S. L., Motepe, M. M. (2006). Exploring the socio-emotional needs and problems of and life skills needed by early adolescent AIDS orphans: A qualitative study. Abstracts of papers. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5, 3, 17.
Denzin, N. K. (1989). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Eaves, Y. D. (2001). A synthesis technique for grounded theory data analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 35, 5, 654-663.
Giddens, A. (2006). Nowoczesność i tożsamość. „Ja” i społeczeństwo w epoce późnej nowoczesności. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Glaser, B. G (1978). Theoretical sensivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valey, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G (2002). Constructivist grounded theory? Qualitative Social Research, 3, 3, art. 12; http://www.qualitative-research.net/lqs/
Glaser, B. G. (2009). Jargonizing: The use of the grounded theory vocabulary. The Grounded Theory Review, 8, 1; http://www.groundedtheory.com/booksjournals.aspx
Glaser, B. G, Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine (wyd. polskie: Odkrywanie teorii ugruntowanej. Strategie badania jakościowego. Warszawa: Nomos 2009).
Greckhamer, T., Koro-Ljunberg, M. (2005). The erosion of a method: Examples from grounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 18, 6, 729-750.
Jost, W., Hyde, M. J. (red.) (1997). Rhetoric and hermeneutic in our time. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Furman, R., Letz, C., Langer, C. L. (2006). The research poem in international social work: Innovations in qualitative methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5, 3, 1-8.
Kelle, U. (2006). Combining qualitative and quantitative methods in research practice: Purposes and advantages. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 293-311.
Kulazińska, A. (2009). Sztuka vs. życie. Rozmowa z Mireią Sallares; www.obieg.pl (3.06).
Mills, J., Bonner, A., Francis, K. (2006). The development of constructivist grounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5, 1, 1-10.
McAdams, D., West, S. G (1997). Introduction: Personality psychology and the case study. Journal of Personality, 65, 4, 756-785.
Porter, S. (2007). Validity, trusthworthiness and rigour: Reasserting realism in qualitative research.
Journal of Advanced Nursing, 60, 1, 79-86.
Ritchie, L. (2006). The spaces in-between: Narratives surrounding quantitative data collection.
Abstracts of papers. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5, 3, 69.
Robles-Silva, L. (2006). Doing fieldwork with old people: Methodological challenges. Abstracts of papers. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5, 3, 69.
Rolfe, G (2006). Validity, trustwhorthiness and rigour: Quality and the idea of qualitative research.
Journal of Advanced Nursing, 53, 3, 304-310.
Sandelowski, M. (2000). Combining qualitative and quantitative sampling, data collection and analysis techniques in mixed-method studies. Research in Nursing & Health, 23, 3, 246-255. Sallares, M. (2009). To have & to lose [Mieć i stracić]. Wystawa w Gdańskim Centrum Sztuki Współczesnej Łaźnia, czerwiec.
Stern, P. A. (1994). Eroding grounded theory. W: J. Morse (red.), Critical issues in qualitative research methods. Thousand Oaks, Ca: Sage Publications.
Wilson, H. S., Hutchinson, S. A. (1996). Methodological mistakes in grounded theory. Nursing Research, 45, 122-124.
Published
2019-03-29
Issue
Section
Discussion
Copyright (c) 2010 Roczniki Psychologiczne
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
