Reimagining Imagia. Neurocognitive Theory of Image Revisited With the Consciousness Studies Perspective
Abstract
Imagia. Towards a neurocognitive theory of image (Francuz, 2013) defines art perception as a synthesis between acts of perception and visual imagination limited by attentional constraints. The majority of empirical evidence the author referred to in the book focuses on visual processing, attention, and aesthetic judgements. Nevertheless, other mechanisms involved in the subjective experience formation undoubtedly also plays a role in the perception of art. Thus, it seems worth complementing the fundaments of the neurocognitive theory of image with consciousness literature. The research in this domain often reminds us that we see much more than is presented. Our conscious perception is modified, extended, and enriched due to multiple mechanisms, such as prediction, integration, or learning. Here, I review selected examples of work from the consciousness literature to illustrate this claim. Furthermore, I discuss this work in the context of art perception. Finally, I reconstruct the model proposed by Francuz and offer its extension that accounts for the aspects covered by the original work and those addressed in this paper.
References
Anzulewicz, A., Hobot, J., Siedlecka, M., & Wierzchoń, M. (2019). Bringing action into the picture. How action influences visual awareness. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 81(7), 2171–2176. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01781-w
Aru, J., Rutiku, R., Wibral, M., Singer, W., & Melloni, L. (2016). Early effects of previous experience on conscious perception. Neuroscience of Consciousness, 2016(1), niw004. https://doi.org/10.1093/nc/niw004
Aru, J., Tulver, K., & Bachmann, T. (2018). It’s all in your head: Expectations create illusory perception in a dual-task setup. Consciousness and Cognition, 65, 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2018.09.001
Block, N. (2011). Perceptual consciousness overflows cognitive access. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(12), 567–575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.11.001
Block, N. (2015). The puzzle of perceptual precision. In T. Metzinger & J. M. Windt (Eds.), Open MIND: 5(T) (pp. 1–52). MIND Group.
Brieber, D., Nadal, M., Leder, H., & Rosenberg, R. (2014). Art in time and space: Context modulates the relation between art experience and viewing time. PloS One, 9(6), e99019. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099019
Cleeremans, A., Achoui, D., Beauny, A., Keuninckx, L., Martin, J. R., Muñoz-Moldes, S., ..., & De Heering, A. (2020). Learning to be conscious. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(2), 112–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.11.011
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity. Current psychological perspectives (pp. 325–339). Cambridge University Press.
Del Pin, S. H., Skóra, Z., Sandberg, K., Overgaard, M., & Wierzchoń, M. (2021). Comparing theories of consciousness: Why it matters and how to do it. Neuroscience of Consciousness, 2021(2), niab019. https://doi.org/10.1093/nc/niab019
Dijkstra, N., Bosch, S., & van Gerven, M. A. (2017). Vividness of visual imagery depends on the neural overlap with perception in visual areas. Journal of Neuroscience, 37(5), 1367–1373. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3022-16.2016
Dijkstra, N., Mazor, M., Kok., P., & Fleming, S. (2021). Mistaking imagination for reality: Congruent mental imagery leads to more liberal perceptual detection. Cognition, 212, 104719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104719
Eco, U. (2004). On beauty: A history of a western idea. Vintage UK.
Francuz, P. (2013/2021). Imagia. Towards a neurocognitive theory of image. Wydawnictwo KUL. https://afterimagia.pl/en
Francuz, P., Zaniewski, I., Augustynowicz, P., Kopiś, N., & Jankowski, T. (2018). Eye movement correlates of expertise in visual arts. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12, 87. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00087
Frigg, R., & Hartmann, S. (2020). Models in science. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2020). Metaphysics Research Lab: Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/models-science
Fudali-Czyż, A., Francuz, P., & Augustynowicz, P. (2018). The effect of art expertise on eye fixation-related potentials during aesthetic judgment task in focal and ambient modes. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1972. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01972
Gombrich, E. H. (1995). The story of art. Phaidon Press.
Hekkert, P., & Van Wieringen, P. C. (1996). Beauty in the eye of expert and non-expert beholders: A study in the appraisal of art. The American Journal of Psychology, 109(3), 389–407. https://doi.org/10.2307/1423013
Hohwy, J. (2013). The predictive mind. Oxford University Press.
Ishizu, T., & Zeki, S. (2011). Toward a brain-based theory of beauty. PloS One, 6(7), e21852. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021852
Jankowski, T., Francuz, P., Oleś, P., & Chmielnicka-Kuter, E. (2020). The effect of temperament, expertise in art, and formal elements of paintings on their aesthetic appraisal. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 14(2), 209–223. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000211
Jankowski, T., Francuz, P., Oleś, P., Chmielnicka-Kuter, E., & Augustynowicz, P. (2020). The effect of painting beauty on eye movements. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 16(3), 213–227. https://doi.org/10.5709/acp-0298-4
Jaśkiewicz, M., Francuz, P., Zabielska-Mendyk, E., Zapała, D., & Augustynowicz, P. (2016). Effects of harmonics on aesthetic judgments of music: An ERP study involving laypersons and experts. Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis, 76(2), 142–151. https://doi.org/10.21307/ane-2017-013
Kawabata, H., & Zeki, S. (2004). Neural correlates of beauty. Journal of Neurophysiology, 91(4), 1699–1705. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00696.2003
Lau, H., & Rosenthal, D. (2011). Empirical support for higher-order theories of conscious awareness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(8), 365–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.05.009
Lischetzke, T., Angelova, R., & Eid, M. (2011). Validating an indirect measure of the clarity of feelings: Evidence from laboratory and naturalistic settings. Psychological Assessment, 23(2), 447–455. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022211
Łukowska, M., Sznajder, M., & Wierzchoń, M. (2018). Error-related cardiac response as information for visibility judgements. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 1131. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19144-0
Nęcka, E. (2012). Psychologia twórczości. Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.
Oleś, P., Chmielnicka-Kuter, E., Jankowski, T., Francuz, P., Augustynowicz, P., & Łysiak, M. (2021). Personal meanings inspired by the beauty of paintings. Art & Perception, 9(1), 90–111. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134913-bja10023
O’Regan, J. K., Myin, E., & Noë, A. (2005). Skill, corporality and alerting capacity in an account of sensory consciousness. Progress in Brain Research, 150, 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(05)50005-0
Rees, G., Kreiman, G., & Koch, C. (2002). Neural correlates of consciousness in humans. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3(4), 261–270. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn783
Shapiro, L., & Spaulding, S. (2021). Embodied cognition. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2021). Metaphysics Research Lab: Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/embodied-cognition
Siedlecka, M., Skóra, Z., Paulewicz, B., Fijałkowska, S., Timmermans, B., & Wierzchoń, M. (2019). Responses improve the accuracy of confidence judgements in memory tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45(4), 712–723. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000608
Van de Cruys, S. & Wagemans, J. (2011). Putting reward in art: A tentative prediction error account of visual art. i-Perception, 2(9), 1035–1062. https://doi.org/10.1068/i0466aap
Weisberg, R. W. (2015). On the usefulness of “value” in the definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 27(2), 111–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2015.1030320
Copyright (c) 2021 Annals of Psychology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
