What (or Maybe Who?) Is a Deceased Person and the Need to Legally Regulate the Legal Status of Deceased Persons – a Proposal for de lege ferenda Regulation

Keywords: deceased person, legal status, personal law, ontology

Abstract

The legal status of deceased people is not regulated in virtually any of the democratic countries on any of the inhabited continents. There are still disputes in the doctrine about whether human corpse is a thing, as well as about the admissibility of defamation of deceased persons. Moreover, in legal circulation there is no legal definition of a deceased person, but only human corpses and human remains. The Polish criminal law criminalizes insulting the corpse, ashes, the grave or other resting place of the deceased, as well as looting it, however, no punitive libel (defamation) of the deceased person is allowed, which, however, does not result from the interpretation of the provisions of art. 212 of the Criminal Code, but adopted in the jurisprudence of the case-law line advocating the teleological interpretation of a given regulation. The lack of regulation creates numerous interpretation problems in the doctrine, including to determine the subject of protection of the crime of looting a corpse or a grave. In law, and in particular in criminal law, it is unacceptable to justify the criminalization of certain behaviors by tradition or their universal condemnation without legislative specification of the elements of the structure of the offense. Therefore, the need to regulate the legal status of deceased persons should be considered necessary under the current legal status The article has interdisciplinary character on the border between philosophy and law. It consists of three parts. In the first one, the concepts of apprehending the deceased were analyzed. The second part is a review of the literature dealing with the possibility of assigning (subjective) rights to deceased persons. The last part of the article is the author’s proposal de lege ferenda regarding the way of regulating the legal situation of a deceased person in the Polish legal system.

References

Armstrong Walter: Nothing but Good of the Dead, „ABA Journal” 18 (1932), nr 4, s. 230-231.

Belliotti Raymond: Do Dead Human Beings Have Rights?, „Personalist” 60 (1979), s. 201.

Binder William: Publicity Rights and Defamation of the Deceased: Resurrection or R.I.P.?, [w:] „DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law” 12 (2012), z. 2, s. 297-332.

Birnhack Michael: The Rights of the Dead, the Freedom of the Living, „Tel Aviv Law Review” 31 (2008), nr 1, s. 57-114.

Broome John: Weighing Lives, New York: Oxford University Press 2004.

Byrne Peter: The Many Worlds of Hugh Everett III: Multiple Universes, Mutual Assured Destruction, and the Meltdown of a Nuclear Family, London: Oxford University Press 2010.

Callahan John: On Harming the Dead, „Ethics” 97 (1987), nr 2, s. 341-352.

Cameron Franklin: Defamation survivability and the demise of the antique „actio personalis” doctrine, „Columbia Law Review” 88 (1983), s. 1833-1851.

Complak Krystian (red.): Godność człowieka jako kategoria prawna, Wrocław: Centrum Handlu i Poligrafii 2001.

Dadańska Katarzyna, Tomczyk Adriana: Kontrowersje wokół prawa do grobu, [w:] Non omnis moriar. Osobiste i majątkowe aspekty prawne śmierci człowieka. Zagadnienia wybrane, red. J. Gołaczyński, J. Mazurkiewicz, J. Turłukowski, D. Karkut, Wrocław: Oficyna prawnicza 2015, s. 150-173.

Davisson Zack: Yūrei. Niesamowite duchy w kulturze japońskiej, Kraków: Wydawnictwo UJ 2018.

Eldredge Lawrence: The Law of Defamation. Tom 2, Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill 1978.

Fassbender Ursula: Reinkarnacja, Wrocław: Astrum 2015.

Feinberg Joel: Harm and Self-Interest, „Rights, justice, and the bounds of liberty: essays in social philosophy” 45 (1980), s. 45-68.

Feinberg Joel: Harm to Others, New York: Oxford University Press 1984.

Feinberg Joel: The Moral Limits of Criminal Law: Harm to Others, New York: Oxford University Press 1984.

Feldman Fred: Confrontations with the Reaper – A Philosophical Study of the Nature and Value of Death, New York: Oxford University Press 1992.

Feldman Fred: The Termination Thesis, „Midwest Studies in Philosophy” 98 (2000), s. 98-115.

Góral Roman: Kodeks karny. Praktyczny komentarz, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Zrzeszenia Prawników Polskich 2002.

Gruszecka Dagmara: Komentarz do art. 262 Kodeksu karnego, [w:] Kodeks karny. Część szczególna. Komentarz, red. J. Giezek, D. Gruszecka, N. Kłączyńska, G. Łabuda, A. Muszyńska, T. Razowski, Warszawa: LEX 2014, nr 168423.

Hacker Daphna: The rights of the dead through the prism of Israeli succession disputes, „International Journal of Law in Context” 2015, nr 1, s. 40-58.

Hryniewicz Elżbieta: Przestępstwa abstrakcyjnego i konkretnego zagrożenia dóbr prawnych, Warszawa: C.H. Beck 2012.

Ishiguro Hidé, Skorupski John: Possibility, „Aristotelian Society Supplementary” 54 (1980), s. 73-104.

Lewis Clive, Hooper Walter: Of Other Worlds. Essays and Stories, New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich 1975.

Madoff Ray: Immortality and the Law: The Rising Power of the American Dead, New Haven: Yale University Press 2010.

Mazurkiewicz Jacek: Non omnis moriar: ochrona dóbr osobistych zmarłego w prawie polskim, Wrocław: Wydawnictwo UWr 2010.

Meyer Michael: Dignity, Death and Modern Virtue, „American Philosophical Quarterly” 32 (1995), nr 1, s. 45-55.

Montgomery Jacob: Godność ludzka w momencie śmierci i narodzin, [w:] Godność człowieka jako kategoria prawna, red. K. Complak, Wrocław: Centrum Handlu i Poligrafii 2001, s. 55-75.

Nagel Thomas: Mortal Questions, Mortal Questions, New York: Cambridge University Press 1979.

Nowak Paweł: O skutkowości przestępstw formalnych, „Zeszyty Prawnicze UJ” 14 (2014), nr 1, s. 159-175.

Partridge Ernest: Posthumous Interests and Posthumous Respect, „Ethics” 91 (1981), nr 2, s. 243-264.

Peiper Leon: Komentarz do kodeksu karnego, Kraków: Leon Frommer 1936.

Piechowiak Marek: Tomasza z Akwinu koncepcja godności osoby ludzkiej jako podstawy prawa. Komentarz do rozdziałów 111-113 księgi III Tomasza z Akwinu. Summa contra gentiles, „Poznańskie studia teologiczne” 14 (2013), s. 219-242.

Pitcher George: The Misfortunes of the Dead, „American Philosophical Quarterly” 21 (1984), nr 2, s. 183-188.

Platt Wes: Other space. Down to Earth Chronicle, Durham: Jointhesaga 2012.

Pływaczewski Emil: Komentarz do art. 262 KK, [w:] Kodeks karny. Komentarz, tom II, red. A. Wąsek, Warszawa: C.H. Beck 2004, s. 366-380.

Rybak Agnieszka: Prawnokarna ochrona godności zwłok człowieka, „Palestra. Pismo Adwokatury Polskiej” 1-2 (2014), s. 99-105.

Silverstein Harry: The Evil of Death, „Journal of Philosophy” 77 (1980), nr 7, s. 401-424.

Smet Stijn: Freedom of Expression and the Right to Reputation: Human Rights in Conflict, „American University International Law Review” 26 (2011), nr 1, s. 183-236.

Smolensky Kirsten: Rights of the dead, [w:] „Hofstra Law Rewiew”, s. 763-804.

Sperling Daniel, Posthumous Interests. Legal and Ethical Perspectives, New York: Cambridge University Press 2008.

Stefański Ryszard: Przestępstwo znieważenia zwłok, prochów ludzkich lub grobu, „ Prokuratura i Prawo” 10 (2004), s. 19-28.

Szpunar Adam: O ochronie pamięci osoby zmarłej, „Palestra” 28 (1984), nr 7-8, s. 1-10.

Taylor James: Death, Posthumous Harm, and Bioethics, New York: Routledge 2012.

Taylor James, The Myth of Posthumous Harm, „American Philosophical Quarterly” 42 (2005), nr 4, s. 311-322.

Tworkowska Anna: Implikacje prawne i społeczno-kulturowe śmierci człowieka, ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem problematyki ochrony dóbr osobistych (rozprawa doktorska), Białystok: Uniwersytet w Białymstoku 2013.

Wilkinson Martin: Daniel Sperling, Posthumous Interests: Legal and Ethical Perspectives, „Journal of Value Inquiry” 43 (2009), s. 531–535.

Winter Stephen: Against Posthumous Rights, „Journal of Applied Philosophy” 27 (2010), nr 2, s. 186-199.

Zgoliński Igor: Zniesławienie w polskim prawie karnym. Zagadnienia teorii i praktyki, Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer 2013.

Published
2021-06-17
Section
Articles: Law