A Phenomenon of Visual Turn and Visual Studies in Contemporary Culture
Abstract
With references to such well known scholars of visual culture as T. Mittchel, M. Jay and V. Flusser, the author examines the phenomenon of visual turn—shows how and why twentieth century philosophers and scholars are interested in visual culture and how visuality conquered various socio-cultural spaces. Interfaces between pictorial turn and privileging of vision over the other senses (ocularcentrism) and new technologies are analyzed. The author argues that visual turn should not be understood as a mechanical copying of reality or an act without creativity, therefore it is different from ancient theory of mimesis. Thus this paper disclose concept of visual, which represents not a return to traditional theory of adequacy, but rather it represents a re-discovered post-linguistic image created by interaction of imagination, conceptual creative process and visible reality. Interfaces among popular visual studies and various social sciences and humanities are analyzed; their testing problems and methods are highlighted. Conclude that scholar’s attention focused toward visual studies and rousing of new visual studies programs at various universities and high schools is connected with domination of visual aspect in contemporary culture and rapidly growing need for specialists who could work in various fields of visual culture. The author argues that visual studies are interdisciplinary phenomenon, but they could be treated as a separate discipline, even if having rather studio than scientific nature. The aim of visual studies is to create and present theories to help understand how images function in the wider cultural sphere. By analyzing development of visual studies in contemporary Lithuania the author conclude that it is very dynamic and popular field.
References
Arystoteles. Poetyka. Wrocław: Ossolineum 1989.
Bal Mieke: Visual essentialism and the object of visual culture. „Journal of Visual Culture” 2(1):2003 s. 5-32.
Barevičiūtė Jovilė: Klasikinė panoptikumo samprata: vizualinis-komunikacinis aspektas. „Filosofija. Sociologija” 21(1):2010 s. 37-44.
Baudrillard Jean: Symulakry i symulacja. Tł. S. Królak. Warszawa: Wyd. Sic! 2005.
Bredekamp Horst: Theorie des Bildakts, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag 2010.
Flusser Vilém. Writings. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press 2002.
Foss Sonja, Kanengieter Maria: Visual Communication in the Basic Course. „Communication Education” 41:1992 s. 314-326.
Vision and Visuality. Ed. H. Foster. Seattle: Bay Press 1988.
Godefroy Frédéric: Dictionnaire de l’ancienne langue française et de tous ses dialectes du ixe au xve siècle. Édition de Paris 1881.
Howells Richard: Visual Culture. Cambridge: Polity Press 2008.
Jameson Friedrich: The Cultural Turn. London–Brooklyn, NY:Verso 1999.
Jay Martin: Scopic Regimes of Modernity. W: Vision and Visuality. Ed. H. Foster. Seattle: Bay Press 1988 s. 3-23.
Jay Martin: Downcast Eyes: The Denigration of Thought in Twentieth-Century French Thought. Berkley–Los Angeles–London: University of California Press 1994.
Jay Martin: Nowoczesne władze wzroku. W: Przestrzeń, filozofia i architektura. Osiem rozmów o poznawaniu, produkowaniu i konsumowaniu przestrzeni. Red. E. Rewers. Poznań: Wyd. Fundacji Humaniora 1999.
Juzefovič Agnieška: „Vaizdo vaidmuo siejant komunikacines strategijas filosofijoje ir sociologijoje. „Filosofija. Sociologija” 24 (3):2013 s. 131-139.
Kirtiklis Kęstas: Kai vizualinis posūkis suka atgal: V. Flusserio medijų istoriosofija. „Filosofija. Sociologija” 21(1):2010.
Medijų kultūros balsai. Teorijos ir praktikos. Ed. Vytautas Michelkevičius). Vilnius: Mene 2009.
Mirzoeff Nicholas: An Introduction to Visual Culture. London: Routledge 1999.
Mitchell Thomas W.J.: Picture Theory: Essays on Verbal and Visual Representation. Chicago–London: The University of Chicago Press 1995.
Mitchell Thomas W.J.: Showing seeing: a critique of visual culture. „Journal of Visual Culture” 1 (2):2002.
Orwell George: Nineteen Eighty-four. London: Secker and Warburg 1949.
Platon: Państwo. Przeł. W. Witwicki. Kęty: Antyk 2003.
Reimeris Ramojus: Vizualumo studijos Lietuvoje. „Filosofija. Sociologija” 22(1):2011 s. 3-11.
Žilinskaitė Viktorija: Vaizdo link: okuliarcentrizmas ir jo tyrimo metodologija. „Filosofija. Sociologija” 21(1):2010 s. 3-10.