Spinoza’s Geometry of Affective Relations, the Body Politic, and the Social Grammar of Intolerance: A Minimalist Theory of Toleration
Abstract
In this paper, we set out to show that the relationships between individuals, including the intersubjectivity inherent to the body politic, are also affective relationships, so as to reconstruct Spinoza’s minimalist theory of tolerance. According to Spinoza’s concept of affectivity and bodily life, affection refers to a state of the affected body and implies the presence of the affecting body, while affect refers to the transition from one state to another, taking into account the correlative variation of affective bodies, that is, the affect is always a passage or variation in the intensity of our power to exist and act — the increase or decrease, the favoring or the restraint of our power to exist and act. We argue that Spinoza’s geometry of affective relations decisively contributes to a political theory of democracy, insofar as it anticipates modern, liberal conceptions of tolerance.
References
Ayalon, Noa Lahav. 2021. “Love and Essence in Spinoza’s Ethics.” Manuscrito 44 (3): 1–41.
Bejczy, Istvan. 1997. “Tolerantia: A Medieval Concept.” Journal of the History of Ideas 58: 365–84.
Brown, Wendy, and Rainer Forst. 2014. The Power of Tolerance. A Debate. New York: Columbia University Press.
Chauí, Marilena. 1999. A nervura do real: imanência e liberdade em Espinosa. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras.
Chauí, Marilena. 2003. Política em Espinosa. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras.
Chauí, Marilena. 2011. Desejo, paixão e ação na Ética de Espinosa. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras.
Costa da Silva, Elainy. 2020. Afetividade e Reflexividade: A possibilidade de realização das relações de tolerância a partir de uma leitura da filosofia de Benedictus de Spinoza. Porto Alegre: Editora Fênix.
Damasio, Antonio. 2003. Looking for Spinoza: Joy, Sorrow, and the Feeling Brain. New York: Harcourt.
De Oliveira, Nythamar. 2016. Tractatus politico-theologicus. Porto Alegre: Editora Fi.
De Oliveira, Nythamar. 2002. “Justice globale et démocratisation selon John Rawls.” In Civilisation et Barbarie, edited by Jean-François Mattéi et Denis Rosenfield, 211–29. Paris: PUF.
Deleuze, Gilles. 2003. Spinoza philosophie pratique. Paris: Minuit.
Deleuze, Gilles. 1968. Spinoza et le problème de l’expression. Paris: Minuit.
Dobbs-Weinstein, Idit. 2015. Spinoza’s Critique of Religion and Its Heirs: Marx, Benjamin, Adorno. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Forst, Rainer. 2003. Toleranz im Konflikt. Geschichte, Gehalt und Gegenwart eines umstrittenen Begriffs. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Forst, Rainer. 2017. “Toleration.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2017), edited by Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2017/entries/toleration.
Harvey, Warren Zev. 2014. “‘Ishqh, esheq, and amor Dei intellectualis.” In Spinoza and Medieval Jewish Philosophy, edited by Steven Nadler. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Israel, Jonathan. 2019. “Spinoza’s Formulation of the Radical Enlightenment’s Two Foundational Concepts: How Much Did He Owe to the Dutch Golden Age Political-Theological Context?” In Spinoza in Twenty-First-Century American and French Philosophy, edited by Jack Stetter and Charles Ramond. New York: Bloomsbury.
Kantorowitz, Ernst. 2016. The King’s Two Bodies: A Study in Mediaeval Political Theology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Lordon, Frédéric. 2013. La société des affects. Pour un structuralisme des passions. Paris: Seuil.
Macherey, Pierre. 1992. Avec Spinoza : Études sur la doctrine et l’histoire du spinozisme. Paris: PUF.
Macherey, Pierre. 1998. Introduction à l’Éthique de Spinoza: La première partie: La nature des choses. Paris: PUF.
Macherey, Pierre. 1997. La deuxième partie: La réalité mentale. Paris: PUF.
Macherey, Pierre. 1995. La troisième partie: La vie affective. Paris: PUF.
Macherey, Pierre. 1997. La quatrième partie: La condition humaine. Paris: PUF.
Macherey, Pierre. 1994. La cinquième partie: Les voies de la libération. Paris: PUF.
Melamed, Yitzhak Y., ed. 2015. The Young Spinoza: A Metaphysician in the Making. Oxford University Press.
Melamed, Yitzhak. 2004. “Salomon Maimon and the Rise of Spinozism in German Idealism.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 42 (1): 67–96.
Melamed, Yitzhak, and Michael Rosenthal, eds. 2010. Spinoza’s Theological-Political Treatise. A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mendus, Susan, ed. 1999. Politics of Toleration: Tolerance and Intolerance in Modern Life. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Misrahi, Robert. 1972. Le Désir et la réflexion dans la philosophie de Spinoza. Paris: Gramma, Gordon and Breach.
Nadler, Steven. 2006. Spinoza’s Ethics: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nederman, Cary J., and John C. Laursen, eds. 1996. Difference and Dissent: Theories of Toleration in Medieval and Early Modern Europe. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Nussbaum, Martha. Political emotions: Why love matters for justice. Harvard University Press, 2013.
Popper, Karl. 1945. The Open Society and Its Enemies. 2 vols. London: Routledge.
Prinz, Jesse. 2004. Gut Reactions: A Perceptual Theory of Emotion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ramond, Charles. 2016. Spinoza Contemporain: Philosophie, Éthique, Politique. Paris, L’Harmattan.
Ramond, Charles. 2007. Dictionnaire Spinoza. Paris: Ellipsis.
Ramond, Charles. 1998. Spinoza et la pensée moderne. Constitutions de l’objectivité. Paris: L’Harmattan.
Ramond, Charles. 2021. “Spinoza dans la modernité: Du règne de la quantité à la refondation immanente de la démocratie.” Veritas 66:1–13.
Ramond, Charles. 2019. “A Response: Spinoza’s Paradoxical Radicalism.” In Spinoza in Twenty-First-Century American and French Philosophy, edited by Stetter Jack and Charles Ramond, 349–60. New York: Bloomsbury.
Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rawls, John. 1996. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press, 1996.
Rosenthal, Michael A. 2001. “Tolerance as a Virtue in Spinoza’s Ethics.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 39(4): 535–57.
Rovere, Maxime. 2017. Le clan Spinoza: Amsterdam, 1677. L’invention de la liberté. Paris: Flammarion.
Rovere, Maxime. 2019. “Spinoza et les langues. Une approche pragmatique.” In Spinoza, philosophe grammairien, edited by Jean Baumgarten, Irène Rosier-Catach, and Pina Totaro. Paris: CNRS Editions.
Saar, Martin. 2002. “Genealogy and Subjectivity.” European Journal of Philosophy 10(2): 231–45.
Saar, Martin. 2013. Die Immanenz der Macht: Politische Theorie nach Spinoza. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
Saar, Martin. 2014. “The Immanence of Power: From Spinoza to ‘Radical Democracy’.” Mededelingen vanwege het Spinozahuis 106. Voorschooten: Uitgeverij Spinozahuis.
Sévérac, Pascal. 1998. “Passivité et désir d’activité chez Spinoza.” In Spinoza et les affects, Travaux et Decuments 7, by Fabienne Bergère, Pierre-François Moreau, and Groupe de Recherches Spinozistes. Paris: Presses de l’Université de Paris-Sorbonne.
Spinoza, Benedictus de. 1988. Correspondências completas. Translated by Juan Domingo Sánchez Estop. Madrid: Hipérión, 1988.
Spinoza, Benedictus de. 1995. Spinoza: The Letters. Translated by Samuel Shirley. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
Spinoza, Benedictus de. 1972. Spinoza Opera. Edited by Carl Gebhardt. 5 vols. Heidelberg: Carl Winters.
Spinoza, Benedictus de. 2005. Éthique. Translated and edited by Robert Misrahi. Paris: Editions de L’Éclat.
Spinoza, Benedictus de. The Collected Works of Spinoza. Translated and edited by Edwin Curley. 2 vols. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Vol. 1, 1984. Vol. 2, 2005.
Stetter, Jack, and Charles Ramond, eds. 2019. Spinoza in Twenty-First-Century American and French Philosophy. New York: Bloomsbury.
Wolfson, Harry A. 1962. The Philosophy of Spinoza. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Yakira, Elhanan. 2015. Spinoza and the Case for Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yovel, Yirmyahu. 1989. Spinoza and Other Heretics. Vol. 1, The Marrano of Reason. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1989.
Zac, Sylvain. 1979. Philosophie, théologie, politique dans l’oeuvre de Spinoza. Paris: Vrin.
Zac, Sylvain. 1965. Spinoza et l’interprétation de l’écriture. Paris: PUF.
Copyright (c) 2022 Roczniki Filozoficzne
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
