Benevolence or Mercy? The Problem with the First Premise of the Hiddenness Argument

Keywords: Hiddenness Argument, God’s love, attributes of God, models of Christian love, benevolent theism, merciful theism, J. L. Schellenberg

Abstract

The first premise of J. L. Schellenberg’s Hiddenness Argument equates God’s love with a positive relationship to human beings. To illustrate this relationship, the human model of parental love is used, based on the standards of the modern American liberal world, not on the biblical standard. As a result, we attribute to God a narrowly understood horizontal relationship towards people, which is completely alien to the understanding of love developed in the Christian tradition. When we refer to the classical theism that recognized love as the central attribute of God, we will see that it should be understood in a vertical model, consisting in the offering of good and mercy. This understanding undermines the benevolent theism and replaces it with the merciful theism or theism of mercy. Ultimately, this makes the first premise of the Hiddenness Argument very questionable and the whole argument calls for a significant revision.

References

Aquinas, Thomas. Summa Theologica. Translated by the English Dominican Fathers. Vol. 1, 1a QQ. 1–119. Notre Dame, IN: Ave Maria Press, 2000.

Aristotle. Nicomachean Ethics. Translation and historical introduction by Christopher Rowe, philosophical introduction and commentary by Sarah Broadie. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.

Bernard. On Loving God. Cistercian Fathers Series 13B. Analytical commentary by Emero Stiegman. Kalamazoo, MI: Cistercian Publications, 1995.

Brummer, Vincent. The Model of Love: A Study in Philosophical Theology. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993.

Green, Adam, and Eleonore Stump, eds. Hiddenness Divinity and Religious Belief. New Perspectives. Cambridge University Press, 2015.

Howard-Snyder, Daniel, and Paul K. Moser, eds. Divine Hiddenness: New Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.

John Paul II. Dives et Misericordia. In Pope John Paul II. Encyclicals. Trivandrum, India: Carmel International Publishing House, 2005.

Kavanaugh, Kieran, ed. John of the Cross: Doctor of Light and Love. New York: Crossroad Publishing, 1999.

Kowalska, Faustina Maria. Diary. Divine Mercy in My Soul. 3rd ed. Stockbridge, MA: Marian Press, 2003.

Moser, Paul K. “Divine Hiddenness and Self-Sacrifice.” In Green and Stump, Hiddenness Divinity and Religious Belief, 71–88.

Nygren, Anders. Agape and Eros. Translated by Philip S. Watson. London: S.P.C.K., 1957.

Outka, Gene. Agape. An Ethical Analysis. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1972.

Rea, Michael C. “Hiddenness and Transcendence.” In Green and Stump, Hiddenness Divinity and Religious Belief, 210–25.

Rea, Michael C. The Hiddenness of God. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.

Rougemont de, Denis. L’Amour et l’Occident. Paris: Librairie Plon, 1956.

Schellenberg, J. L. Divine Hiddenness and Human Freedom. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1993.

Schellenberg, J. L. The Hiddenness Argument: Philosophy’s New Challenge to Belief in God. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.

Published
2021-09-24
Section
Articles