Personal Resilience: Empirical Typology and Method of Measurement

  • Zenon Uchnast

Abstract

Ego-resilience (ER), defined and operationalized by J. Block, has been made more precise as regards A. Maslow's conception of the motivational factors of security (Security Feeling Syndrome – SFS) and psychological health, as a characterological determinant of whether an individual functions adequately in the changing and often stressful circumstances. In order to measure ER and SFS J. Block's ER-89 scale was employed and the author's factor version of A. Maslow's Security-Insecurity Inventory.

144 men and 144 women, aged 18-23, took part in the research. A statistically significant co-variability has been found between ER and the factors of security (SFS). Moreover, having used the multiple regression model, ego-resilience between ER and SFS factors was operationalized in terms of personal resilience – PR, as a continuous variable. This variable may form a basic ground for empirical typology in the sense of a characterologically interpreted PR.

The subjects with a high PR index are characterized by a high level of the sense of intimacy, confidence and openness in relation to their closest surrounding. They trust their own competence and ability to employ their personal and accessible means to behave as adequate as possible. They reveal a tendency to obtain rather lower scores as regards the factor of stability, a fact that should be interpreted as their readiness to accept the risk of losing acquired routine and self-confidence when committing himself to new, often surprising, situations, and undertaking respective tasks.

The persons of a low personal resilience have the highest scores in the factor of stability and the factor of self-confidence, and the lowest level as regards the sense of intimacy and openness to their surrounding. They are concentrated on themselves, on safeguarding and supporting the actual status quo.

The types of personality that have thus been distinguished express two different orientations in life. They should not be simplified in terms of two polar traits of personality, ways of beha­viour, or even in terms of the existential dilemma: security-growth, as described by Maslow.

References

Beardslee W. R. (1989). The role of self-understanding in resilient individuals: The development of a perspective. Journal of American Orthopsychiatric Ass., 59(2), 266-278.

Block J. (1965). The challenge of response sets. Unconfounding meaning, acquiescence, and social desirability in the MMPI. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

Block J. (1971). Lives through time. Berkeley, CA: Bancroff.

Block J. (1991). Prototypes for the California Adult Q-Set. Berkeley: Department of Psy¬chology, University of California.

Block J., Kremen A. M. (1996). IQ and Ego-Resiliency: Conceptual and empirical connections and separateness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(2), 349-361.

Brody N. (19922). Intelligence. San Diego: Academic Press.

Garmezy N., Masten A. S. (1986). Stress, competence, and resilience: Common frontiers for therapist and psychopathologist. Behavior Therapy, 17, 500-521.

Gibson J.J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

Goleman D. (1997). Inteligencja emocjonalna. Poznań: Media Rodzina of Poznań.

Klohnen E. C. (1996). Conceptual analysis and measurement of the construct of ego-resiliency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(5), 1067-1079.

Kolton M. S., Dwarshuis L. (1973). A clinical factor analytic method for inferring construct meaning. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 33, 653-661.

Kosmitzki C., John O. P. (1993). The implicit use of explicit conceptions of social intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, (15), 11-23.

Lifton R. J. (1993). The protean self: Human resilience in an age of fragmentation. New York: BasicBooks.

Maslow A. (1986). W stronę psychologii istnienia. Warszawa: IW Pax (Toward a Psychology of Being – I wyd. Princeton NJ 1962, D. Van Nostrand).

Maslow A. (1971). The farther reaches of human nature. New York: The Viking Press.

Maslow A. (1990). Motywacja i osobowość. Warszawa: IW Pa (Motivation and Personality – I wyd. 1954, II – 1970).

Maslow A. (1977). Politics 3. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 17(4), 5-20.

Maslow A., Birch, E., Honigmann I., McGrath F., Plason A., Stein M. (1952). Manual for the Security-Insecurity Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc.

Robins R. W., Oliver J. P., Caspi A., Moffitt T. F., Stouthamer-Loeber M. (1996). Resilient, overcontrolled, and undercontrolled boys: Three replicable personality types. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(1), 157-171.

Sternberg, R. J., Smith, C. (1985). Social intelligence and decoding skills in nonverbal communication. Social Cognition, (3), 168-192.

Uchnast Z. (1990). Metoda pomiaru poczucia bezpieczeństwa. W: A. Januszewski, Z. Uchnast, T. Witkowski (red.), Wykłady z psychologii w KUL. Lublin: RW KUL, t. 5, s. 95-108.

Uchnast Z. (1995). Zdarzenia życiowe osoby ludzkiej: Podejście ekologiczne. Roczniki Filozoficzne, 43(4), 5-23.

Walker R. E., Foley J. M. (1973). Social intelligence: Its history and measurement. Psychological Reports, 33, 839-864.

Published
2020-11-16
Section
Articles