Teleological Explanation of Irreducible Complexity of the Biochemical Systems

  • Dariusz Sagan University of Zielona Góra
Keywords: intelligent design theory, evolution, irreducible complexity, design inference, Neo-Darwinism

Abstract

The main purpose of this article is a presentation of one of the subtheories included in the so‑called intelligent design theory – a concept of irreducible complexity of the biochemical systems. The concept says that some features of different biochemical structures indicate that they are designed. It is an alternative concept to naturalistic theories of evolution, and especially to the Neo-Darwinian theory of the development of the life forms that is currently the dominating theory in biology. I shortly discuss the logical and empirical point of the concept of irreducible complexity, whereas I give special attention to the most interesting, from the methodological point of view, part of the concept, namely the explanatory point. The explanatory point is concerned with the issue of design detection in natural sciences. I present also a response of the concept’s of irreducible complexity critics, in the form of a variety of proposals of the evolutionary scenarios of the irreducibly complex systems origins. Although some of these scenarios describe material processes that, theoretically, are capable of producing the irreducible complexity, I agree with a criticism of intelligent design theory proponents that a high degree of speculativity of the evolutionary explanations presently does not allow for examination if these explanations correspond to the real history of irreducibly complex systems origins. Because, so far, both the evolutionists and design theorists are developing only general approaches to the issue of irreducible complexity that need further detailed analyses, I recognize that the problem of irreducible complexity of the biochemical systems remains unsolved in the advantage of one of the proposed theories.

Author Biography

Dariusz Sagan, University of Zielona Góra

M.A. Dariusz Sagan – Department of Logic and Methodology of Sciences, Institute of Philosophy, University of Zielona Góra

References

Abbey T.: Michael Behe Promotes Intelligent Design, „Stanford Review”, May 13, 2005, http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=view&id=2576

Alberts B.: The Cell as a Collection of Protein Machines: Preparing the Next Generation of Molecular Biologists, „Cell” 1998, vol. 92, s. 291 (cyt. za: W. A. Dembski, Irreducible Complexity Revisited, „Progress in Complexity, Information, and Design” November 2004, vol. 3.1.4, s. 1).

Arnhart L., Behe M. J., and Dembski W. A.: Conservatives, Darwin & Design: An Exchange, „First Things”, November 2000, no. 107, s. 23-31.

Behe M. J.: A Catholic Scientist Looks at Darwinism, [w:] Uncommon Dissent: Intellectuals Who Find Darwinism Unconvincing, ed. W. A. Dembski, ISI Books, Wilmington, Delaware 2004, s. 133-151.

Behe M. J.: Blind Evolution or Intelligent Design?: Address to the American Museum of Natural History, „American Museum of Natural History”, April 23, 2002, http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=view&id=1205

Behe M. J.: Darwin Under the Microscope, Watchmaker, January/February/March 1997, no. 1, vol. 4, s. 27 [26-28] (tłum. pol: M. J. Behe, Darwin pod mikroskopem, „Na Początku…” 1997, nr 1 (82), s. 3-7, http://creationism.org.pl/artykuly/MJBehe).

Behe M. J.: Darwin’s Black Box, [w:] Faith, Freedom, and the Future: Religion in American Political Culture, ed. Ch. W. Dunn, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., Lanham–Boulder–New York–Oxford 2003, s. 87-100.

Behe M. J.: Darwin’s Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution, The Free Press, New York 1996.

Behe M. J.: Darwinism and Design, „Trends in Ecology and Evolution”, June 6, 1997, vol. 12, no. 6, s. 229.

Behe M. J.: Design for Living: The Basis for Design Theory of Origins, „The New York Times”, February 7, 2005, http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=view&id=2415

Behe M. J.: Evidence for Design at the Foundation of Life, [w:] Science and Evidence for Design in the Universe, ed. M. J. Behe, W. A. Dembski and S. C. Meyer, Ignatius Press, San Francisco 2000, s. 113-129, http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command =view&id=1782

Behe M. J.: Faith and the Structure of Life, [w:] Science and Faith, ed. G. V. Bradley, J. D. and D. De Marco, St. Augustine’s Press, South Bend, Ind. 2001, s. 13-34.

Behe M. J.: Filozoficzne zarzuty stawiane hipotezie inteligentnego projektu: odpowiedź na krytykę, przeł. D. Sagan, „Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy” 2004, t. 1, s. 115-139, http://www.nauka-a-religia.uz.zgora.pl/index.php?action=tekst&id=28

Behe M. J.: Intelligent Design Theory as a Tool for Analyzing Biochemical Structures, [w:] Mere Creation: Science, Faith & Intelligent Design, ed. W. A. Dembski, InterVarsity Press, Downers Grove, Ill. 1998, s. 177-194.

Behe M. J.: Irreducible Complexity: Obstacle to Darwinian Evolution, [w:] Debating Design: From Darwin to DNA, ed. M. Ruse and W. A. Dembski, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2004, s. 352-370.

Behe M. J.: Precyzyjny projekt: powstawanie biologicznych mechanizmów molekularnych, przeł. D. Sagan, „Na Początku…” 2004, nr 5-6 (181-182), s. 163-183, http://www.nauka-a-religia.uz. zgora.pl/index.php?action=tekst&id=25.

Behe M. J.: Randomness or Design in Evolution?, „Ethics & Medics”, June 1998, vol. 23, no. 6, s. 3-4.

Coyne J. A.: God in the Details, „Nature”, September 19, 1996, vol. 383, s. 227-228, http://pondside.uchicago.edu/ceb/Behe_review.pdf

Crick F.: What Mad Pursuit, Basic Books, New York 1988, s. 138 (cyt. za: W. A. Dembski, Powrót projektu do nauk przyrodniczych, przeł. D. Sagan, „Na Początku…” 12 (2004), nr 9-10 (185-186), s. 323-342, http://www.nauka-a-religia.uz.zgora.pl/index.php?action= tekst&id= 44).

Dawkins R.: Ślepy zegarmistrz czyli, jak ewolucja dowodzi, że świat nie został zaplanowany, przeł. A. Hoffman, Biblioteka Myśli Współczesnej, Państwowy Instytut Wydawniczy, Warszawa 1994.

Dembski W. A.: Irreducible Complexity Revisited, „Progress in Complexity, Information, and Design” November 2004, vol. 3.1.4, s. 1-47, http://www.iscid.org/papers/Dembski_ IrreducibleComplexityRevisited_011404.pdf

Dembski W. A.: Evolution’s Logic of Credulity: An Unfettered Response to Allen Orr, http://www.designinference.com/documents/2002.12.Unfettered_Resp_to_Orr.htm

Dembski W. A.: No Free Lunch: Why Specified Complexity Cannot Be Purchased without Intelligence, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., Lanham–Boulder–New York–Oxford 2002.

Dembski W. A.: The Design Revolution: Answering the Toughest Questions about Intelligent Design, InterVarsity Press, Downers Grove, Il. 2003.

DeRosier D. J.: The turn of the screw: The bacterial flagellar motor, „Cell” 1998, vol. 93, s. 17-20 (cyt. za: M. J. Behe, Współczesna hipoteza inteligentnego projektu. Łamanie reguł, przeł. D. Sagan, „Na Początku…” 12 (2004), nr 7-8 (183-184), s. 244-266, http://www.nauka-a-religia.uz.zgora.pl /index.php?action=tekst&id=40).

Doolittle R. F.: Subtelna równowaga, przeł. D. Sagan, „Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy” 2004, t. 1, s. 55-64, http://www.nauka-a-religia.uz.zgora.pl/index.php?action=tekst&id=52

Futuyma D. J.: Cuda a molekuły, przeł. D. Sagan, „Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy 2004, t. 1, s. 65-69, http://www.nauka-a-religia.uz.zgora.pl/index.php?action=tekst&id=36

Gene M.: Irreducible Complexity and Darwinian Pathways: Guest Response to Article by R.H. Thornhill and D.W. Ussery, „ARN Forum”, June 16, 2000, http://www.arn.org/docs/ behe/mb_mg1darwinian pathways.htm

Glanz J.: Evolutionists Battle New Theory on Creation, „The New York Times” 2001, April 8, vol. CL, no. 51,717, http://www.nytimes.com/2001/04/08/science/08DESI.html?ex=1117598400 &en=e591d273ff325022&ei=5070

Harsh R.: Irreducible Complexity? The Challenge!, http://www.geocities.com/Cape Canaveral/ Lab/7896/icprt1.html

Matzke N. J.: Evolution in (Brownian) Space: A Model for the Origin of the Bacterial Flagellum, November 10, 2003, http://www.talkdesign.org/faqs/flagellum. html

Miller K. R.: Answering the Biochemical Argument from Design, [w:] God and Design: The Teleological Argument and Modern Science, ed. N. A. Manson, Routledge, London 2003, s. 292-307.

Miller K. R.: The Flagellum Unspun: The Collapse of «Irreducible Complexity», [w:] Debating Design: From Darwin to DNA, ed. M. Ruse and W. A. Dembski, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2004, s. 81-97.

Orr H. A.: Ponownie darwinizm kontra inteligentny projekt, przeł. D. Sagan, „Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy” 2004, t. 1, s. 33-48, http://www.nauka-a-religia.uz.zgora.pl/index.php? action=tekst&id= 46

Pennock R. T.: Creationism and Intelligent Design, „Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics” 2003, vol. 4, s. 143-163.

Sagan D.: Michaela Behe’ego koncepcja nieredukowalnej złożoności, „Na Początku…” 11 (2003), nr 11-12A (174-175), s. 402-417, http://www.nauka-a-religia.uz.zgora.pl/index.php? action=tekst&id=22

Sagan D.: Spór o naukowość współczesnej teorii inteligentnego projektu na przykładzie Michaela Behe’ego koncepcji nieredukowalnej złożoności, „Przegląd Filozoficzny – Nowa Seria” 2004, R. 13, Nr 3 (51), s. 39 [37-54], http://www.nauka-a-religia.uz.zgora.pl/index.php? action=tekst&id=8

Schneider Th. D.: Evolution of Biological Information, „Nucleic Acids Research” 2000, vol. 28, no. 14, s. 2794-2799, http://nar.oupjournals.org/cgi/content/full/28/ 14/2794

Shanks N. and Joplin K. H.: Redundant Complexity: A Critical Analysis of Intelligent Design in Biochemistry, „Philosophy of Science”, June 1999, vol. 66, s. 268-282, http://www.etsu.edu/philos/faculty/niall/complexi.htm

Weber B. H.: Biochemical Complexity: Emergence or Design?, [w:] Darwinism, Design and Public Education, ed. J. A. Campbell and S. C. Meyer, Michigan State University Press, East Lansing 2003, s. 455-462.

Weber B. H.: Irreducible Complexity and The Problem of the Biochemical Emergence, „Biology and Philosophy” 1999, vol. 14, s. 593-605, http://nsmserver2.fullerton.edu/departments/chemistry/ Evolution_creation/Web/Behe.doc

Wilkins A.: A Special Issue on Molecular Machines, „BioEssays” 2003, vol. 25 (12), s. 1146 (cyt. za: W. A. Dembski, Irreducible Complexity Revisited, „Progress in Complexity, Information, and Design” November 2004, vol. 3.1.4, s. 2).

Wolf J.: Two Kinds of Causality: Philosophical Reflections on “Darwin’s Black Box”, „Progress in Complexity, Information, and Design”, October-December 2002, vol. 1.4, s. 1-18, http://www.iscid.org/papers/Wolf_TwoKinds_110802.pdf

Published
2020-10-13
Section
Articles