Panentheism: In reference to the Views of Józef Życiński, Charles Hartshorne, and Other Representatives of “the Panentheistic Turn”

  • Jacek Wojtysiak The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Faculty of Philosophy
Keywords: panentheism; classical theism; pantheism; Hartshorne; Życiński; natural (philosophical) theology

Abstract

In this paper I try to present some main origins, varieties, motives and ideas of the philosophical and theological movement called “the panentheistic turn”. Particular attention is paid to the Ch. Hartshorne’s combinatorial analyses (based on “the law of polarity”) and to the J. Życiński’s conception of “the field of rationality”. I distinguish five forms or domains of the contemporary panentheism. The first of them—the linguistic one—uses the preposition in or spatial metaphors to express the relation between God and the world. The second—the (inter)cultural panentheism—is the result of searching for a common theology to many different religions. The third type—the Christian panentheism – interprets some main dogmas of Christian faith in the spirit of kenotic theology. At an end the ontological panentheism can be defined as the metaphysics (of God and world) emerged from the German idealism and the process philosophy. Its newest kind is the scientific panentheism based on the idea of emergence. After these distinctions I compare the ontological panentheism with the classical theism. In my opinion there are some irremovable differences between both options. I also defend the thesis that the main arguments given by the panentheists against the classical theism do not constitute the sufficient reasons to prefer their position.

References

Dembowski B., ks. (1989): O filozofii chrześcijańskiej w Ameryce Północnej, Warszawa: Akademia Teologii Katolickiej.

Dombrowski D. (2009): Charles Hartshomc, [w:] E.N. Z a 11 a (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2009 Edition), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2009/entries/hartshorne/.

Ford L.S. (2004): Contrasting Conceptions of Pancnthcism, „The Modern Schoolman” 81, nr 3, s. 226-231.

Gawęcki B.J. (1967): Filozofia rozwoju. Zarys stanowiska filozoficznego, Warszawa: IW Pax.

G ut P. (2011): Spinoza o naturze ludzkiej, Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.

Gutowski P. (1995): Filozofia procesu i jej metafilozofia. Studium metafizyki Ch. Hartshornc’a, Lublin: RW KUL.

Hartshorne Ch., Re es c W.L. (1953): Philosophers Speak of God, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Hartshorne Ch.E. (1976): Aquinas to Whitehead. Seven Centuries of Metaphysics of Religion. The Aquinas Lecture, Milwaukee: Marquette University Publications.

Hartshorne Ch. (1984): Omnipotence and Other Theological Mistakes, New York: State University of New York Press.

Hartshorne Ch. (2005): Pantheism and Panenthcism, [w:] L. Jones (ed.), Encyclopedia of Religion, vol. 10, Detroit: Macmillan Reference, s. 6960-6965.

Haskcr W. (1983): Metaphysics. Constructing a World View, Downers Grove: Inter Varsity Press.

Herbut J. (2008): Filozofia procesualna Alfreda N. Whiteheada, [w:] tenże, Artykuły i szkice. Z metodologii i teorii metafizyki, filozoficznej analizy języka religii oraz etyki i metaetyki,

Opole: Redakcja Wydawnictw Wydziału Teologicznego Uniwersytetu Opolskiego, s. 149-159.

Bracken J.A., SJ (2004): Pancnthcism: A Field Oriented Approach, w:] In Whom We Live and Move and Have Our Being. Panentheistic Reflections on God’s Presence in a Scientific World, Ph. Clayton, A. Peacocke (cds.), Grand Rapids, MI - Cambridge, U.K.: William B. Ecrdmans Publishing Company 2004, s. 211-221.

Brierley M.W. (2004): Naming a Quiet Revolution: The Pancntheistic Turn in Modern Theology, s. 1-15.

Clayton Ph. (2004a): Panentheism in Metaphysical and Scientific Perspective, w:] In Whom We Live and Move and Have Our Being. Panentheistic Reflections on God’s Presence in a Scientific World, Ph. Clayton, A. Peacocke (cds.), Grand Rapids, MI - Cambridge, U.K.: William B. Ecrdmans Publishing Company 2004, s. 73-91.

Clayton Ph. (2004b): Pancnthcism Today: a Constructive Systematic Evaluation, w:] In Whom We Live and Move and Have Our Being. Panentheistic Reflections on God’s Presence in a Scientific World, Ph. Clayton, A. Peacocke (cds.), Grand Rapids, MI - Cambridge, U.K.: William B. Ecrdmans Publishing Company 2004, s. 249-264.

Gregersen N.H. (2004): Three Varictcs of Pancnthcism, w:] In Whom We Live and Move and Have Our Being. Panentheistic Reflections on God’s Presence in a Scientific World, Ph. Clayton, A. Peacocke (cds.), Grand Rapids, MI - Cambridge, U.K.: William B. Ecrdmans Publishing Company 2004, s. 19-35

Nesteruk A.V. (2004): The Universe as Hypostatic Inherence in the Logos of God: Panenthcism in the Eastern Ortodox Perspective, w:] In Whom We Live and Move and Have Our Being. Panentheistic Reflections on God’s Presence in a Scientific World, Ph. Clayton, A. Peacocke (cds.), Grand Rapids, MI - Cambridge, U.K.: William B. Ecrdmans Publishing Company 2004, s. 169-183.

Peacocke A. (2004): Articulating God’s Presence in and to the World Unveiled by the Science, w:] In Whom We Live and Move and Have Our Being. Panentheistic Reflections on God’s Presence in a Scientific World, Ph. Clayton, A. Peacocke (cds.), Grand Rapids, MI - Cambridge, U.K.: William B. Ecrdmans Publishing Company 2004, s. 137-154.

Ward K. (2004): The World as the Body of God: A Pancntheistic Metaphor, w:] In Whom We Live and Move and Have Our Being. Panentheistic Reflections on God’s Presence in a Scientific World, Ph. Clayton, A. Peacocke (cds.), Grand Rapids, MI - Cambridge, U.K.: William B. Ecrdmans Publishing Company 2004, s. 62-72.

Ware K. (2004): God Immanent yet Transcendent: The Divine Energies according to Saint Gregory Palamas, w:] In Whom We Live and Move and Have Our Being. Panentheistic Reflections on God’s Presence in a Scientific World, Ph. Clayton, A. Peacocke (cds.), Grand Rapids, MI - Cambridge, U.K.: William B. Ecrdmans Publishing Company 2004, s. 157-168.

Levine M. (2010): Non-Thcistic Conceptions of God, [w:] Ch. Meister, P. Copan (cds.), The Routledgc Companion to Philosophy of Religion, London-New York: Routlcdgc, s. 237-248.

Moltmann J. (1995): Bóg w stworzeniu, przeł. Z. Danielewicz, Kraków: Znak 1995. (Pierwotne wydanie oryginału - 1985).

Morris T.V. (1991): Metaphysical Dependence, Independence, and Perfection, [w:] S. McDonald (ed.), Being and Goodness. The Concept of the Good in the Metaphysics and Philosophical Theology, Ithaca-London: Cornell University Press 1991, s. 278-297.

Niziński R.S., OCD (2002): Między teizmem a pantcizmem: Charlcsa Hartshornc’a procesualna filozofia Boga, Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.

Peacocke A. (1991): Teologia i nauki przyrodnicze, przel. L.M. Sokołowski, Kraków: Znak 1991. (Pierwotne wydanie oryginału - 1971).

Peters E.H. (1970): Hartshorne and Neoclassical Metaphysics. An Interpretation, Lincoln: University of Nebrasca Press.

Piwowarczyk M. (2008): Bóg i stawanie się. Problem relacji świat-Bóg w filozofii Alfreda Northa Whiteheada, Lublin: TN KUL.

Sia S. (1985): God in Process Thought. A Study in Charles Hartshornc’s Concept of God, Dordrecht: MartinusNijhoff Publishers.

Sokołowski R. (1982): The God of Faith and Reason. Fundations of Christian Theology, Notre Dame-London: University of Notre Dame Press.

Wainwright W.J. (1987): God’s Body, [w:] T.V. Morris (ed.), The Concept of God, Oxford: Oxford University Press, s. 72-87.

Woj tysiak J. (2008): „Dlaczego istnieje raczej coś niż nic?” Analiza problemu w kontekście dyskusji we współczesnej filozofii analitycznej, Lublin: TN KUL.

Wojtysiak J. (2012): Spór o istnienie Boga. Analityczno-intuicyjny argument na rzecz teizmu, Poznań-Kraków: W drodze - Kolegium Filozoficzno-Teologiczne 00. Dominikanów.

Życiński J. (1983): Metafizyka o smaku przygody, [w:] tenże, M. Heller, Drogi myślących, Kraków: Polskie Towarzystwo Teologiczne, s. 25-35.

Życiński J. (1986): Teizm i filozofia analityczna, t. II, Kraków: Znak.

Życiński J. (1992): Bóg Abrahama i Whiteheada, Tarnów: Biblos.

Życiński J. (2002): Bóg i ewolucja. Podstawowe pytania ewolucjonizmu chrześcijańskiego, Lublin: TN KUL.

Życiński J. (2009): Wszechświat emergentny. Bóg w ewolucji przyrody, Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.

Życiński J. (2011): Świat matematyki i jej materialnych cieni. Elementy platonizmu w podstawach matematyki, Kraków: Copernicus Center Press.

Published
2020-06-10
Section
Articles