Signs of God’s Presence: Charles S. Evans’ Theory of Theistic Natural Signs — An Interpretation and a Critique
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to interpret and criticize the theory of theistic natural signs (TNS), formulated by Charles S. Evans. TNS are characteristic experiences or features of the world which cause the person who encounters them to form certain basic beliefs about the existence and nature of God. I propose two interpretations of how TNS work, using the categories of perception and indirect perceptual recognition. I also present two arguments against the theory of TNS. First, I point out that the theory does not explain adequately why TNS are ambiguous, i.e., can be read in different ways. Second, I observe that certain experiences may be taken to be „atheistic natural signs”. Their existence gives one a reason to suspect that God is a deceiver.
References
Adams, Sarah, i Jon Robson. 2016. „Does absence make atheistic belief grow stronger?” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 79: 49–68. DOI: 10.1007/s11153-015-9532-3.
Dostojewski, Fiodor. 1913. Bracia Karamazow. Przełożyła Barbara Beaupré. Warszawa: Biblioteka Dzieł Wyborowych.
Evans, Charles S. 2010. Natural Signs and Knowledge of God. A New Look at Theistic Arguments. New York: Oxford University Press.
Evans, C[harles] S. 2011. „Religious Experience and the Question of Whether Belief in God Requires Evidence”. W: Evidence and Religious Belief. Red. Kelly James Clark i Raymond J. VanArragon, 37–51. New York: Oxford University Press.
Galewicz, Włodzimierz. 1996. „Williama Jamesa spór z agnostycyzmem”. W: William James. Prawo do wiary. Przełożył Adam Grobler, 7–33. Kraków: Znak.
Gellman, Jerome. 1992. „A New Look at the Problem of Evil”. Faith and Philosophy 9, 2: 210–216.
Kartezjusz. 2006 [1647]. Medytacje o filozofii pierwszej. Przełożył Jan Hartman. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Zielona Sowa.
Plantinga, Alvin. 2000. Warranted Christian Belief. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ruczaj, Stanisław. 2017. „Doświadczenie zła jako racja dla ateizmu (analiza koncepcji Jerome’a I. Gellmana)”. Racjonalia 7: 7–20. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15633/r.2441.
Schellenberg, John. 2015. The Hiddenness Argument: Philosophy’s New Challenge to Belief in God. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
West, Ryan, i Adam C. Pelser. 2015. „Perceiving God through Natural Beauty”. Faith and Philosophy 32, 3: 293–312. DOI: 10.5840/faithphil20157743.
Copyright (c) 2020 Roczniki Filozoficzne
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
