The Protection of Client’s Interests, as Arising from the Right (Requirement) to Rely On Legal Professional Privilege in China, Compared to Polish Solutions – the Development of the System

Part IV. Chinese Model of Mutual Relationsbetween the Attorney and the Clientduring the Period of the People’s Republic of China

Keywords: Mao Zedong; persecution of Chinese lawyers; Cultural Revolution

Abstract

During the first decades that followed the establishment of the People’s Republic of China (1949) it was very difficult to pursue a legal profession. The communist authorities were reluctant and hatred against its representatives, especially towards the attorneys. The legal practitioners were constantly suspected of disloyalty and the propensity to conspire against the authorities. Therefore, the lawyers were subjected to mass persecution, leading to the extermination of the vast majority of this professional group, until the death of the creator of new political system - Mao Zedong. Only in the 1980’s, we can observe a gradual rebuilding of the justice structures, as well as the restoration of civilized relations between the attorneys and their clients. In recent years, it has increased the likelihood of a better protection for the client’s interests before Chinese courts.

References

Agacka–Indecka, Joanna. 2005. “Tajemnica zawodowa adwokata – znaczące rozstrzygnięcia sądów.” Palestra 7–8:121–122.

Conner, Alison W. 2009. “China’s Lawyers and Their Training: Enduring Influences and Disconnects.” Legal Development in East Asia: China and Vietnam Compared, Forthcoming June 1. In https://ssrn.com/abstract=1433602 [accessed: 24.07.2018].

Dargas, Marta. 2012. “W jakim kierunku zmierza prawo Chińskiej Republiki Ludowej – ku systemowi common law czy ku kompleksowej kodyfikacji prawa?.” Gdańskie Studia Azji Wschodniej 1:59–68.

Jurzyk, Marek. 1998. “Tajemnica zawodowa adwokatów w systemie prawnym Stanów Zjednoczonych.” Palestra 4–5:162–180.

Kaftal, Alfred. 1970. “Procesowe zagadnienia tajemnicy adwokackiej.” Palestra 14(145), no. 1:31–50.

Lynch, Elizabeth M. 2011. “China’s Rule of Law Mirage: The Regression of the Legal Profession Since the Adoption of the 2007 Lawyers Law.” George Washington International Review 42:535–585.

Łągiewska, Magdalena. 2016. “Wykonywanie zawodów prawniczych w świetle ustawodawstwa chińskiego.” Gdańskie Studia Azji Wschodniej 9:105–122.

Marshall, John McClellan. 2013. “Ewolucja przywileju poufności adwokat-klient w sądownictwie angloamerykańskim.” In Etyka zawodów prawniczych w praktyce. Relacje na sali rozpraw, edited by Grzegorz Borkowski, 15–18. Lublin: Krajowa Szkoła Sądownictwa i Prokuratury.

Xu, Xi. 2009. “A Comparative Study of Lawyers’ Ethics in the US and PRC: Attorney – Client Privilege and Duty of Confidentiality.” Tsinghua China Law Review 1:46–61.

Published
2019-10-28
Section
Articles: Law