The Systems of the Supreme Courts in the Nordic States. The Outline of the Problem
Abstract
The paper aims at conducting comparative analysis of the role and tasks performed by the Supreme Courts in the Nordic legal and political systems. The subject of the work is particularly concentrated on deliberations referring to the functions of the Supreme Courts in the Scandinavian states, as well as the principles of organization and functioning, on which the Supreme Courts systems are based in this European region. An essential part of the analysis covers determining of the common features and differences possible to be observed while comparing the states belonging to the Eastern and Western Nordic legal culture circles.
References
Bårdsen Arnfinn: The Nordic Supreme Courts as Constitutional Courts: Main Features as Seen from the Norwegian Perspective, Joint Seminar between the Constitutional Court of Austria and the Supreme Court of Norway, Vienna the 29-30th of October 2015, [w:] https://www.domstol.no/globalassets/upload/hret/artikler-og-foredrag/nordic-constitutional-courts---vienna-29102015.pdf [dostęp: 18.01.2018].
Bruzelius Karin M.: The Nordic Constitutions and Judicial Review, [w:] http://www.constcourt.md/public/files/file/conferinta_20ani/programul_conferintei/Karin_Bruzelius_2.pdf [dostęp: 18.01.2018].
Follesdal Andreas, Wind Marlene: Introduction – Nordic Reluctance towards Judicial Review under Siege, Nordisk Tidsskrift for Menneskerettigheter 27 (2009), nr 2, s. 131-141.
Garlicki Leszek: Constitutional Courts versus Supreme Courts, International Journal of Constitutional Law 5 (2007), nr 1, s. 44-68.
Helgadóttir Ragnhildur: Nonproblematic Judicial review: A case study, International Journal of Constitutional Law 9 (2011), nr 2, s. 532-547.
Hirsch Günter: Appointing of Supreme Court Judges. Examination of Situation in Individual Countries, [w:] http://network-presidents.eu/sites/default/files/Report_Hirsch_eng%5B1%5D.pdf [dostęp: 18.01.2018].
Hirschl Ran: The Nordic Counternarrative: Democracy, Human Development and Judicial Review, International Journal of Constitutional Law 9 (2011), nr 2, s. 449-469.
Iceland’s Judicial System, Scandinavian Studies in Law 51 (2007), s. 606-607.
Iuul Stig: The Danish Supreme Court Through 300 Years, Scandinavian Studies in Law 6 (1962), s. 163-183.
Lavapuro Juha, Ojanen Tuomas, Scheinin Martin: Rights-Based constitutionalism in Finland and the Development of Pluralist Constitutional Review, International Journal of Constitutional Law 9 (2011), nr 2, s. 505-531.
Lindblom Per H.: Studier i processrätt, Stockholm: Fritzes 1993.
Lindblom Per H.: The Role of the Supreme Courts in Scandinavia, Scandinavian Studies in Law 39 (2000), s. 325-366.
Modeen Tore: The Founding of the Supreme Administrative Court in Finland set Against its Historical Background in Sweden and Finland, Scandinavian Studies in Law 21 (1977), s. 209-240.
Nergelius Joakim: Om grundlagstolkning, grundlagsvänlig lagtolkning och åsidosättande av grundlagsstridig lag, Svensk Juristtidning 81 (1996), s. 835-871.
Nouisiainen Jaakko: The Role of the Finnish Supreme Court in the Legislative Process, Scandinavian Studies in Law 23 (1979), s. 131-148.
Organy i korporacje ochrony prawa, red. V. Serzhanova, S. Sagan, Warszawa: LexisNexis 2014.
Sarvilinna Sami: Court Administration in Finland, Scandinavian Studies in Law 51 (2007), s. 591-605.
Serzhanova Viktoria, Sagan Stanisław: Nauka o państwie współczesnym, Warszawa: LexisNexis 2013.
Serzhanova Viktoria: Sądy w państwach nordyckich, [w:] Sądownictwo w Europie w XIX i XX wieku, red. E. Leniart, R. Świrgoń–Skok, W.P. Wlaźlak, Kraków: Bikstudio Krzysztof M. Szwaczka 2016, s. 147-167.
Smith Eivind: Høesterett og folkestyret. Prøvningsretten overfor lover, Oslo: Universitetsforlaget 1993.
Smolej Mirka, Johnsen Jon T.: Time Management of Justice Systems: a Northern Europe Study, [w:] https://www.coe.int/t/dghl/cooperation/cepej/Delais/GestionTemps_en.pdf [dostęp: 18.01.2018].
Strömberg Håkan: Ett HD-fall om prövning av en förordnings grundslagsenlighet, Juridisk Tidskrift 2 (1996-97), s. 450-452.
Strömholm Stig: Goal-Steering and Judicial Review, Scandinavian Studies in Law 40 (2000), s. 189-197.
Tamm Ditlev: Nordic Supreme Courts – Differences and Similarities, [w:] Rule of Law – Development and Judicial Reform: Comparison between China and Finland, Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press China 2016, s. 112-120.
Tamm Ditley: Nordic Unity and Nordic Supreme Courts: Differences and Similarities, [w:] Unity and Plurality in the Legal History of the Baltic Sea Area, red. M. Luts–Sootak, S. Osipova, F.L. Schäfer, Frankfurt am Main–Bern–Bruxelles–New York–Oxford–Wien: Peter Lang, Internationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften 2012, s. 287-294.
The Danish Courts – an Organisation in Development, Scandinavian Studies in Law 51 (2007), s. 581-590.
The Supreme Court of Norway. Separation of Powers and Independence of Constitutional Courts and Equivalent Bodies, the 2nd Congress of the World Conference on Constitutional Justice, [w:] http://www.venice.coe.int/WCCJ/Rio/Papers/NOR_Supreme_Court.pdf [dostęp: 18.01.2018].
The Swedish National Courts Administration, Scandinavian Studies in Law 51 (2007), s. 629-650.
Tryggvadóttir Rán, Ingadóttir Thordis: Researching Icelandic Law, [w:] http://www.nyulawglobal.org/globalex/Iceland.html [dostęp: 18.01.2018].
von Eyben W.E.: The Attitude towards Judicial Precedent in Danish and Norwegian Courts, Scandinavian Studies in Law 3 (1959), s. 53-86.
Westerberg Ole: Judicial Review of Administrative Decisions, Scandinavian Studies in Law 16 (1972), s. 307-326.
Zahle Henrik: Judicial Opinion Writing in the Danish Supreme Court (Højesteret), Scandinavian Studies in Law 51 (2007), s. 559-580.
Copyright (c) 2018 Roczniki Nauk Prawnych
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
