“Phase transition” between Confrontation and Dialogue in the Light of the Concept of the Unity Charism
Abstract
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/pepsi-2016-0015
In the twenties of the last century the process of building a new type of philosophical culture began, based on the sensitivity towards another person, the recognition of values and dignity of the person and the search for platforms of dialogue and compromise between people. However, it did not gain a broad social resonance. The 20th Century became the scene of the triumph of totalitarianisms, based on the idea of collectivism and marked by the contempt towards the individual, his rights and needs. In the post-war reality environments favouring the humanization of the culture of coexistence earned a voice, but they too did not manage to divert the tendency towards building a bureaucratic and technocratic order. In this kind of system, the person feels reduced to his instrumental functions, and the dialogue submerged in the world of humanistic values becomes a distant and unequalled dream. This text undertakes the problem of the conditions which must be met in order for the tendency towards dialogue and mutual respect to prevail over the hostile, confrontational approach, which characterizes many contemporary social environments. The author suggests that we refer to the analogy with the thermodynamics phenomenon, phase transition, and consider the notion of spiritual energy (the analogue of the physical term enthalpy) as an agent regulating the internal disposition of the individual to “freeze” or “thaw” relations with his fellow human beings. The key thesis is that the most important source of energy indispensable to move from confrontation to dialogue lies in the resources of religious experience- the openness to the grace flowing from the transcendental reality, and the guides on the path to discovering this source are the witnesses of faith- among them the spiritual heirs of Chiara Lubich’s charism.
References
Assmann, A. (2013). Wprowadzenie: o krytyce, popularności i adekwatności terminu „pamięć” (pp. 9-20). In eadem, Między historią a pamięcią. Antologia, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
Baran, B. (1987). Z historii „nowego myślenia” (pp. 3-30). In B. Baran, T. Gadacz, J. Tischner (Eds.), Rozum i Słowo. Eseje dialogiczne. Kraków: PAT Wydział Filozoficzny.
Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bielik-Robson, A. (1998). Inna nowoczesność. Pytania o współczesną formułę duchowości. Kraków: Universitas.
Buber, M. (1947). Between man and man. Transl. by R. G. Smith. London: Kegan Paul.
Buber, M. (1973). Elemente des Zwischenmenschlichen . In: Idem, Das dialogische Prinzip. Heidelberg: Lambert Schneider.
Buber, M. (1982). Das Problem des Menschen. Heidelberg: Lambert Schneider.
Buber, M. (1992). Ja i Ty. Wybór pism filozoficznych, ed. by J. Doktór, Warszawa: PAX.
Buber, M. (1994). Zwei Glaubensweisen. Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlagshaus.
Castells, M. (1996). The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell.
Chrostowski, W. (1999). O dialogu międzyreligijnym. In Kościół XX wieku. Rozmowy Ewy Czaczkowskiej. Katowice: Księgarnia św. Jacka.
Coda, P. (2001). Un carisma e un’ opera di Dio. In C. Lubich, La dottrina spirituale, a cura di Michele Vandeleene, Milano: Mondadori.
Czapliński, P. (2011). Resztki nowoczesności. Dwa studia o literaturze i życiu. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Literackie.
Ebner, F. (1921). Das Wort und die geistigen Realitäten. Pneumatologische Fragmente. Innsbruck: Brenner-Verlag [http://wfe.sbg.ac.at/exist/apps/ebner-online/index.html, accessed 22.02.2017].
Heidegger, M. (1993). Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Mohr.
Frossard, A. (1982). Nie lękajcie się! Rozmowy z Janem Pawłem II. Vaticanum: Libreria Editrice Vaticana.
Kehl, M. (1996). Wohin geht die Kirche? Eine Zeitdiagnose. Freiburg-Basel-Wien: Herder.
Levinas, E. (1961). Totalité et Infini. Essai sur l’extériorité. La Haye: M. Nijhoff.
Löwith, K. (2013). Das Individuum in der Rolle des Mitmenschen. Ein Beitrag zur anthropologischen Grundlegung der ethischen Probleme. Freiburg-München: K. Alber.
Lubich, Ch. (1991). L’Avventura dell’unità. Intervista di Franca Zambonini. Roma: Città Nuova.
Lubich, Ch. (1995). Pensieri. Roma: Città Nuova.
Mosès, S. (1982). Système et Révélation. La philosophie de Franz Rosenzweig. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
Ortega y Gasset, J. (1962). History as a System ans other essays toward a philosophy of history. Transl. H. Weyl. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.
Ortega y Gasset, J. (2010). Ideas y creencias. Biblioteca Virtual Omegalfa [http://www.omegalfa.es/ accessed 22.07.2016].
Ortega y Gasset, J. (1957). Man and People. Transl. W. R. Trask. New York NY, London: W. W. Norton & Co.
Patočka, J. (1981). La civilisation technique est-elle une civilisation de declin, et pourquoi? In Idem, Essais heretiques sur la philosophie de l’histoire. Trad. E. Abrams. Paris: Verdier.
Sartre, J.-P. (1984), Being and Nothingness. Transl. by H. E. Barnes. New York, London, Toronto, Sydney: Washington Square Press.
Scheler, M. (2014). Der Formalismus in der Ethik und die materiale Wertethik. Hrsg. Ch. Bermes, Hamburg: F. Meiner.
Scheler, M. (1926). Wesen und Formen der Sympathie. Bonn: F. Cohen.
Schnädelbach, H. (1984). German Philosophy 1831-1933. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, Ch. (1994). Sources of the Self. The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tischner, J. (1986). Filozofia człowieka. Od ontologii do metafizyki człowieka. Kraków: PAT Wydział Filozoficzny.
Tischner, J., Spór w królestwie metafor (pp. 57-68). In B. Baran, T. Gadacz, J. Tischner (Eds.), Rozum i Słowo. Eseje dialogiczne. Kraków: PAT Wydział Filozoficzny.
Volkelt, J. (1920). Das ästhetische Bewusstsein: Prinzipienfragen der Ästhetik. München: Beck.
Wilk, E. (2016). Na granicy nerwicy. Dwutygodnik „Polityka” 24 (3063), pp. 14-17.
Żakowski, J. (2002). Rewanż pamięci. Warszawa: Sic!