Becoming a Person of Dialogue

  • Stacy A. S. Williams NCSP, Marist College, Poughkeepsie, New York
  • Nancy O’Donnell MSN, Marist College, Poughkeepsie, New York
Keywords: dialogue, reciprocity, social justice, racial, gender

Abstract

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/pepsi-2016-0014

It is imperative that Social Sciences examine in depth the underlying issues in human relations that have contributed to divisions among persons, within families, institutions, between nations and religions. If we accept that dialogue is the main currency of statecraft, diplomacy, negotiation, mediation and peacebuilding (Rieker and Turn 2015), then we need to ask ourselves, what are the characteristics of a person capable of engaging in dialogue? Are they characteristics that can be taught? Are they characteristics that make us human? In his book “Relational Being” Gergen (2009) warns of the dire consequences we face if we continue on the pathway of “rugged individualism”. He explains how our relationships have become instruments for our own satisfaction. From Freud to Skinner, psychology has described human relationships as being primarily about seeking the greatest pleasure from others. But, the so-called “freedom” that we achieve gives us a satisfaction that is transitory at best. “Freedom contains an emptiness that only relationship can fill” (Gergen, 2009, p. 20). It is essential that we find the path to discovering the true meaning of relationship and more importantly cross-racial/ethnic relationships.

Jean Baker Miller described what she termed “growth-fostering relationships” (Miller, 1986), and Chodorow (2001) has developed a theory regarding development suggesting that women develop along a relational pathway whereas men follow the developmental phases that move them toward autonomy. These theorists, and others, view the relational trait to be particularly characteristic of women. A more comprehensive understanding of the nature of the human person can be attained only by taking into consideration both autonomy and relational ability as equally important.

Capacity for dialogue, therefore, is an important contribution that women bring to the world stage. Women from traditionally marginalized groups offer an essential and unique perspective to this topic due to their understanding of the role of power in the dynamics of relationships. To foster cross-cultural dialogue it is important to examine the power dynamics of what it means to be honest, empathetic and collaborative across cultures.

In this discussion, the authors draw upon the fields of technology, child development, feminism, and the social justice literature in an attempt to articulate the benefits of dialogue. It is far from exhaustive and provides a cursory purview of this challenging topic. It is an example of how integration among different theories can help move our literature forward in understanding a challenging topic as dialogue. It also offers a perspective on how men and women can grow in their relationship building ability, and therefore ability to dialogue, by embracing characteristics like being vulnerable, cooperative, selfless, and nurturing, relating this to the teachings of Chiara Lubich.

References

Adams, M., Bell, L. A., & Griffin, P. (Eds.) (2007). Teaching for diversity and social justice. Routledge.
Administrator (July 14, 2016). Racial trauma is real: The impact of police shootings on African Americans. Retrieved from https://psychologybenefits.org/2016/07/14/racial-trauma-police-shootings-on-african americans/
Anders, G. (1980). The obsolescence of man, Vol. II. Berlin, Germany.
Anderson, C. (2016). White rage: The unspoken truth of our racial divide. New York, NY: Bloomsbury.
Bryant-Davis, T., & Ocampo, C. (2006). A therapeutic approach to the treatment of racist-incident-based trauma. Journal of Emotional Abuse, 6(4), 1-22.
Chodorow, N. (2001). Family structure and feminine personality. In: D. E. Juschka, Feminism in the study of religion (pp. 43-66). New York: Continuum.
Comas-Díaz, L. (2016). Racial trauma recovery: A race-informed therapeutic approach to racial wounds. In A. Alvarez, C. Liang, & H. Neville (Eds.), The cost of racism for people of color: Contextualizing experiences of discrimination.
Cultural, racial, and ethnic psychology book series (pp. 249-272). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association.
Fischer, L. (Ed.). (2002) (Ed). The Essential Gandhi: An Anthology of His Writings on His Life, Work, and Ideas. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
Gergen, K. J. (2009). Relational being. New York: Oxford University Press. Gerzema, J. (2013). The athena doctrine. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Irving, D. (2014). Waking up white and finding myself in the story of race. Cambridge, MA: Elephant Roo.
Lubich, C. (2001). Health today: An achievable balance. Rome, Italy: Movimento Umanità Nuova.
Lubich, C. (2004). What future for a multicultural, multiethnic, multifaith society? Westminster Central Hall, London, England.
Milem, J., Chang, M., & Lising, A. (2005). Making diversity work on campus: A research-based perspective. Washington, DC: AAC&U.
Miller, J. B. (1986). Toward a new psychology of women, 2nd ed. Boston: Beacon Press. Molinari, E., & Cavalieri, P. (2015). Il dono nel tempo della crisi. Milano: Raffaello Cortina Editore (own translation).
Shriberg, D., Song, S. Y., Miranda, A. H., Radliff, K. M. (Eds.). (2013). School psychology and social justice: Conceptual foundations and tools for practice. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group.
Singleton, G. E., & Hays, C. (2005). Beginning courageous conversations about race. In G.E. Singleton & C. Linton. (Eds.), Courageous Conversations About Race: A Field Guide for Achieving Equity in Schools (pp. 18 - 22). Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin.
Stern, D. (1977). The first relationship. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Sue, D. W. (2015). Race talk and the conspiracy of silence: Understanding and facilitating difficult dialogues on race. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley.
Wall, V. A. (2016). Creating a classroom and university culture committed to social justice and equity. Paper presented at the Annual Faculty Retreat at Marist College April 2016, NY.
Williams, S., & Conyers, A. (2016). Race pedagogy: Faculty preparation matters. Administrative Theory & Practice, 38(4), 234 - 250. doi:10.1080/10841806.2016.1239396.
Wise, T. (2012). Dear white America: Letter to a new minority. San Francisco, CA: City Lights Publishers.
Wise, T. (2011). White like me. Berkeley, CA: Soft Skull Press.
Published
2019-04-09
Section
Articles